首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic
admin
2015-08-29
67
问题
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic recovery it is easy to vow that next time lenders’ losses will be pushed onto their creditors, not onto taxpayers.
But cast your mind back to late 2008. Then, the share prices of the world’s biggest banks could halve in minutes. Reasonable people thought that many firms were hiding severe losses. Anyone exposed to them, from speculators to churchgoing custodians of widows’ pensions, tried to yank their cash out, causing a run that threatened another Great Depression. Now, imagine being sat not in the observer’s armchair but in the regulator’s hot seat and faced with such a crisis again. Can anyone honestly say that they would let a big bank go down?
And yet, somehow, that choice is what the people redesigning the rules of finance must try to make possible. The final rules are due in November and will probably call for banks in normal times to carry core capital of at least 10% of risk-adjusted assets. This would be enough to absorb the losses most banks made during 2007-2009 with a decent margin for error.
But that still leaves the outlier banks that in the last crisis, as in most others, lost two to three times more than the average firm. Worse, the crisis has shown that if they are not rescued they can topple the entire system. That is why swaggering talk of letting them burn next time is empty. Instead, a way needs to be found to impose losses on their creditors without causing a wider panic the financial equivalent of squaring a circle.
America has created a resolution authority that will take over failing banks and force losses on unsecured creditors if necessary. That is a decent start, but may be too indiscriminate. The biggest banks each have hundreds of billions of dollars of such debt, including overnight loans from other banks, short-term paper sold to money-market funds and bonds held by pension funds. Such counterparties are likely to run from any bank facing a risk of being put in resolution which, as the recent crisis showed, could mean most banks. Indeed, the unsecured Adebt market is so important that far from destabilising it, regulators might feel obliged to underwrite it, as in 2008.
A better alternative is to give regulators draconian power but over a smaller part of banks’ balance-sheets, so that the panic is contained. The idea is practical since it means amending banks’ debt structures, not reinventing them, although banks would need roughly to double the amount of this debt that they hold. It also avoids too-clever-by-half trigger mechanisms and the opposite pitfall of a laborious legal process. Indeed, it is conceivable that a bank could be recapitalised over a weekend.
The banks worry there are no natural buyers for such securities, making them expensive to issue. In fact they resemble a bog-standard insurance arrangement in which a premium is received and there is a small chance of perhaps one in 50 each year of severe losses. Regulators would, though, have to ensure that banks didn’t buy each other’s securities and that they didn’t all end up in the hands of one investor. Last time round American International Group became the dumping ground for Wall Street’s risk and had to be bailed out too.
Would it work? The one thing certain about the next crisis is that it will feature the same crushing panic, pleas from banks and huge political pressure to stabilise the system, whatever the cost. The hope is that regulators might have a means to impose losses on the private sector in a controlled way, and not just face a binary choice between bail-out or oblivion.
In 2008, the following occurrences happened EXCEPT
选项
A、banks’ capital shrank dramatically.
B、firms pretended to profit.
C、another Great Depression followed.
D、organizations tried to take money back.
答案
C
解析
细节题。由题干定位至第二段。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0ZOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Nooneknowswhostartedit,butthemythofcollegefreshmengaining15poundsormorehasbeenthoroughlydebunkedthroughsci
EffectiveAssignmentsUsingLibraryandInternetResourcesAwell-designedassignmentcanteachstudentsvaluableresearchskill
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisnottrueaboutJefferson?
Contrasttoresearchers’expectations,dysfunctionalfamilyrelationshipsandpoor【M1】______.communicationstylesappearto
FiveCommonMistakesinConversationsandTheirSolutionsⅠ.NotlisteningA.Problem:mostpeopledon’tlisten—waiteager
FiveCommonMistakesinConversationsandTheirSolutionsⅠ.NotlisteningA.Problem:mostpeopledon’tlisten—waiteager
Themeaningsof"science"and"technology"havechangedsignificantlyfromonegenerationtoanother.Moresimilaritiesthandif
Speakingtwolanguagesratherthanjustonehasobviouspracticalbenefitsinanincreasinglyglobalizedworld.Butinrecentye
IntheBlackForest,theacidrainissaidtoattackallEXCEPT
随机试题
血源性肺脓肿最常见的致病菌为
银行或非银行金融机构在国家政策允许的范围内办理与房地产有关的资金筹集、融通和结算等信用活动称为()。
关于派驻监理人员的专业满足程度的说法,正确的是()。
项目后评价主要内容包括()。
我国发展理财服务的基础在于( )。Ⅰ.所有制变迁Ⅱ.居民多元理财渠道拓展Ⅲ.居民金融资产结构多样化Ⅳ.各类市场准入Ⅴ.寻租衍生性收益
下列各项中,不属于应计入损益的利得的是()。
根据下面材料,回答问题。虽然国产大豆与进口大豆的用途存在一定差异,但是二者之间仍然存在较大的替代性。2009年以来,我国国内大豆销售价格几乎都高于进口价格,且大豆没有关税配额限制,在四大粮食作物中,大豆进口量最大在所难免。一方面,大豆国际价格下降和人
到过巴黎的人,都会经过那条塞纳河,它犹如一条长长的玉带,将左岸埃菲尔铁塔,右岸的卢浮宫,以及被塞纳河怀抱的巴黎圣母院等法兰西的文化瑰宝串联在一起。曾经,其污染状况和我国的太湖、巢湖、滇池等淡水湖泊污染状况非常相似,湖水明显变臭,湖泊的富营养化加剧,水功能退
面向对象的程序设计语言是一种()。
A、Muscleschangemost.B、Fatpeoplechangeobviously.C、Fitterpeoplesuffermore.D、Peoplegetsickmoreeasily.C在Dr.Pino的文章中指
最新回复
(
0
)