首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic
admin
2015-08-29
49
问题
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic recovery it is easy to vow that next time lenders’ losses will be pushed onto their creditors, not onto taxpayers.
But cast your mind back to late 2008. Then, the share prices of the world’s biggest banks could halve in minutes. Reasonable people thought that many firms were hiding severe losses. Anyone exposed to them, from speculators to churchgoing custodians of widows’ pensions, tried to yank their cash out, causing a run that threatened another Great Depression. Now, imagine being sat not in the observer’s armchair but in the regulator’s hot seat and faced with such a crisis again. Can anyone honestly say that they would let a big bank go down?
And yet, somehow, that choice is what the people redesigning the rules of finance must try to make possible. The final rules are due in November and will probably call for banks in normal times to carry core capital of at least 10% of risk-adjusted assets. This would be enough to absorb the losses most banks made during 2007-2009 with a decent margin for error.
But that still leaves the outlier banks that in the last crisis, as in most others, lost two to three times more than the average firm. Worse, the crisis has shown that if they are not rescued they can topple the entire system. That is why swaggering talk of letting them burn next time is empty. Instead, a way needs to be found to impose losses on their creditors without causing a wider panic the financial equivalent of squaring a circle.
America has created a resolution authority that will take over failing banks and force losses on unsecured creditors if necessary. That is a decent start, but may be too indiscriminate. The biggest banks each have hundreds of billions of dollars of such debt, including overnight loans from other banks, short-term paper sold to money-market funds and bonds held by pension funds. Such counterparties are likely to run from any bank facing a risk of being put in resolution which, as the recent crisis showed, could mean most banks. Indeed, the unsecured Adebt market is so important that far from destabilising it, regulators might feel obliged to underwrite it, as in 2008.
A better alternative is to give regulators draconian power but over a smaller part of banks’ balance-sheets, so that the panic is contained. The idea is practical since it means amending banks’ debt structures, not reinventing them, although banks would need roughly to double the amount of this debt that they hold. It also avoids too-clever-by-half trigger mechanisms and the opposite pitfall of a laborious legal process. Indeed, it is conceivable that a bank could be recapitalised over a weekend.
The banks worry there are no natural buyers for such securities, making them expensive to issue. In fact they resemble a bog-standard insurance arrangement in which a premium is received and there is a small chance of perhaps one in 50 each year of severe losses. Regulators would, though, have to ensure that banks didn’t buy each other’s securities and that they didn’t all end up in the hands of one investor. Last time round American International Group became the dumping ground for Wall Street’s risk and had to be bailed out too.
Would it work? The one thing certain about the next crisis is that it will feature the same crushing panic, pleas from banks and huge political pressure to stabilise the system, whatever the cost. The hope is that regulators might have a means to impose losses on the private sector in a controlled way, and not just face a binary choice between bail-out or oblivion.
In 2008, the following occurrences happened EXCEPT
选项
A、banks’ capital shrank dramatically.
B、firms pretended to profit.
C、another Great Depression followed.
D、organizations tried to take money back.
答案
C
解析
细节题。由题干定位至第二段。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0ZOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
EffectiveAssignmentsUsingLibraryandInternetResourcesAwell-designedassignmentcanteachstudentsvaluableresearchskill
OnMay13,1940,WinstonChurchill,thenewlyappointedBritishPrimeMinister,gavehisfirstspeechtoParliament.Hewasprep
ThereisnowrittenconstitutioninUK.ItismadeupofthefollowingEXCEPT
ThroughouttheU.S.studentsaregettingouttheirNo.2pencils,readyendureastress-packedfourhoursofbubblinginanswer
______isthelargestriverinSouthIsland.
FiveCommonMistakesinConversationsandTheirSolutionsⅠ.NotlisteningA.Problem:mostpeopledon’tlisten—waiteager
Allofuswillworkinourjobswithdifferentkindsofpeopleandwehavetopossesscertaincharacteristicstokeepongoodte
Themeaningsof"science"and"technology"havechangedsignificantlyfromonegenerationtoanother.Moresimilaritiesthandif
A、sportsmanB、publicservantC、mayorD、policemanB
A、Thepersonwholikestotravelaround.B、Thepersonwholikestoborrowmoney.C、Thepersonwhoisalwaysaskedtolendmoney.
随机试题
下列属于战术营销的有()
急性化脓性牙髓炎有特点的症状是
A、抗精神病作用B、镇吐作用C、体温调节失灵D、帕金森综合征E、巨人症阻断结节-漏斗系统的D2受体可试用于
下列关于债券发行主体的说法中,错误的是()。
阅读下列有关材料,按要求完成任务。材料一《普通高中化学课程标准(实验)》的内容标准举例说明化学能与电能的转化关未及其应用。认识提高燃料的燃烧效率、开发高能清洁燃料和研制新型电池的重要性。材料二某版本教科书《化学2》(必修)的知识结构体系第一章物质结
已知产品某项指标X服从拉普拉斯分布,其密度为f(x)=e-|x-μ|,一∞<x<+∞,其中μ为未知参数.现从该产品中随机抽取3个,测得其该项指标值为1028,968,1007.(1)试用矩估计法求μ的估计;(2)试用最大似然估计法求μ的估计.
执行以下程序段后,(AX)=( )。 MOV AX,0 MOV BX,1 MOV CX,100 A:ADD AX,BX INC BX LOOP A HLT
使用PowerDesigner的DataArchitect可以对数据库生成物理数据模型(PDM),这种功能通常称为【】。
Theboy______blackisLiLei.
A、ItsfieldsofstudiesarethebestamongalltheuniversitiesinCanada.B、Ithaseducatedmanyfamouspeopleinvariousfield
最新回复
(
0
)