首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic
admin
2015-08-29
33
问题
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic recovery it is easy to vow that next time lenders’ losses will be pushed onto their creditors, not onto taxpayers.
But cast your mind back to late 2008. Then, the share prices of the world’s biggest banks could halve in minutes. Reasonable people thought that many firms were hiding severe losses. Anyone exposed to them, from speculators to churchgoing custodians of widows’ pensions, tried to yank their cash out, causing a run that threatened another Great Depression. Now, imagine being sat not in the observer’s armchair but in the regulator’s hot seat and faced with such a crisis again. Can anyone honestly say that they would let a big bank go down?
And yet, somehow, that choice is what the people redesigning the rules of finance must try to make possible. The final rules are due in November and will probably call for banks in normal times to carry core capital of at least 10% of risk-adjusted assets. This would be enough to absorb the losses most banks made during 2007-2009 with a decent margin for error.
But that still leaves the outlier banks that in the last crisis, as in most others, lost two to three times more than the average firm. Worse, the crisis has shown that if they are not rescued they can topple the entire system. That is why swaggering talk of letting them burn next time is empty. Instead, a way needs to be found to impose losses on their creditors without causing a wider panic the financial equivalent of squaring a circle.
America has created a resolution authority that will take over failing banks and force losses on unsecured creditors if necessary. That is a decent start, but may be too indiscriminate. The biggest banks each have hundreds of billions of dollars of such debt, including overnight loans from other banks, short-term paper sold to money-market funds and bonds held by pension funds. Such counterparties are likely to run from any bank facing a risk of being put in resolution which, as the recent crisis showed, could mean most banks. Indeed, the unsecured Adebt market is so important that far from destabilising it, regulators might feel obliged to underwrite it, as in 2008.
A better alternative is to give regulators draconian power but over a smaller part of banks’ balance-sheets, so that the panic is contained. The idea is practical since it means amending banks’ debt structures, not reinventing them, although banks would need roughly to double the amount of this debt that they hold. It also avoids too-clever-by-half trigger mechanisms and the opposite pitfall of a laborious legal process. Indeed, it is conceivable that a bank could be recapitalised over a weekend.
The banks worry there are no natural buyers for such securities, making them expensive to issue. In fact they resemble a bog-standard insurance arrangement in which a premium is received and there is a small chance of perhaps one in 50 each year of severe losses. Regulators would, though, have to ensure that banks didn’t buy each other’s securities and that they didn’t all end up in the hands of one investor. Last time round American International Group became the dumping ground for Wall Street’s risk and had to be bailed out too.
Would it work? The one thing certain about the next crisis is that it will feature the same crushing panic, pleas from banks and huge political pressure to stabilise the system, whatever the cost. The hope is that regulators might have a means to impose losses on the private sector in a controlled way, and not just face a binary choice between bail-out or oblivion.
In 2008, the following occurrences happened EXCEPT
选项
A、banks’ capital shrank dramatically.
B、firms pretended to profit.
C、another Great Depression followed.
D、organizations tried to take money back.
答案
C
解析
细节题。由题干定位至第二段。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0ZOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Toitsfullsense,theBritishparliamentconsistsof______.
AmericanLiteratureAliteratureistherecordofhumanexperienceandpeoplehavealwaysbeenimpelledtowritedowntheirimpr
SomeProblemsFacingLearnersofEnglishAlthoughmanyEnglishlearnershavegothighscoresinanEnglishtestsuchasIELTSor
Thechangesinlanguagewillcontinueforever,butnooneknowssure【M1】______whodoesthechanging.Onepossibilityi
Speakingtwolanguagesratherthanjustonehasobviouspracticalbenefitsinanincreasinglyglobalizedworld.Butinrecentye
WhatdidtheresearchersdiscoverinnorthernKenya?
Punditswhowanttosoundjudiciousarefondofwarningagainstgeneralizing.Eachcountryisdifferent,theysay,andnoonest
WiththeexplosionofexcitementabouttheInternet,thereseemstobeanothertypeofaddictionthathasinvadedthehumanpsyc
除了读书之外,同知心的朋友通信,有时也教我感到一点兴奋。因为写信时可以上天下地的无所不谈,谈的话虽然都不关重要,而且大都是杂乱无章,然而不必像对社会说话时要打起什么腔调。也不必像做学术论文时必须严密地构思。有什么话便说什么,想到那里,笔便写到那里,正是个性
随机试题
共产党早期组织领导的第一个产业工会是()
幂级数的收敛半径为________。
吗啡的药理作用有
患者52岁,已绝经,近月来白带多,黄色,偶有点滴出血,外阴灼热感,检查阴道粘膜皱襞消失,有小出血点,宫颈光滑,宫体稍小,附件(一),该病人最大可能是:
月亮公司在得知环球公司申请仲裁后,能否申请参加太阳公司与环球公司正在进行的仲裁程序?为什么?对仲裁裁决中已经认定的事实,太阳公司在诉讼中能否免除举证责任?为什么?
根据《关于做好住房建设规划与住房建设年度计划制定工作的指导意见》中的规定,下列关于在编制住房建设时应突出重点,落实保障性住房建设标准及要求的表述,不正确的是()
在一些地方,猎杀鸟类以牟取利益的现象时有发生。江南某乡村一方面积不大的池塘,聚集了数百只过冬的天鹅。村民们认为鸟儿也有性命,具有灵性,伤害它不吉利。他们拒绝了市场的诱惑,轮流在塘边值班,义务充当天鹅的“保护神”。时而栖息、时而飞翔的天鹅吸引了大量游客,构成
Mr.MatthewPalmerElevitCommunityCollegePOBox114Brandeis,WA4December2010DearMr.Palmer,I’mwritinginregardt
PleasemakeallcheckspayabletoTheGlassHouse.Toreportanyproblem,contactthesalesrepresentativewhotookyourorderb
ItisoftenrealizedthatwomenheldahighplaceinsouthernEuropeansocietiesinthe10thand11thcenturies.Asawife,the
最新回复
(
0
)