2. 外语
  3. Usually, companies would like to employ experienced applicants. For many college students, they lay their emphasis on study, and

Usually, companies would like to employ experienced applicants. For many college students, they lay their emphasis on study, and

admin2011-01-08  3
问题    Usually, companies would like to employ experienced applicants. For many college students, they lay their emphasis on study, and the experience gained in internship is far from enough. Do you think that companies should exclude potential applicants just because they do not have enough experience? Write an essay of about 400 words on the following topic:
         Should Companies Only Focus on Experience?
选项
答案 Should Companies Only Focus on Experience? As one researcher observed, "At present many companies do not trust new graduates, who may have learned mountains of theories but lack practical abilities. " For many companies, they would like to rank working experience as top requirement in their recruitment programs. But, as a matter of fact, college students have spent years in taking compulsory courses and selective courses, how can they accumulate required experience in college? They can not help wondering whether companies should lay their emphasis on experience when recruiting college graduates. As for me, companies’ focus on experience is short-sighted, and hence companies should not only lay stress on experience. Firstly, what lies behind their focus on experience is the motivation to cut expenditure in employee training. Another consideration is that experienced employees can produce immediate profits. For those employers, they are more interested in making money in the present than cultivating talents for the long-term benefits. They seem to lack long-term strategies of company development. Generally speaking, prestigious companies that have lasted for a dozen years, even hundreds of years, always have a systematic plan for talents training. They would like to bear the burden of new employee training expenditure for the long-term benefits. How can we expect those companies that are apathetic to recruit college graduate to reap profits in the future without enough supply of talented employees? Secondly, while the recruitment of experienced employees can produce short-term profits, it is hard for those experienced employees to identify with the new companies’ culture, and therefore, companies have to suffer from high employee attrition rates. Companies’ cultural identities have been considered increasingly important to maximize productivity by holding both employees and employers together. Loyal employees are willing to stand by their companies in times of ups and downs. When employees frequently come and go, companies have to bear new hiring costs, costs of lost productivity, cost of knowledge, skills and contacts that the person who is leaving is taking with them out of the previous companies. Obviously, the total expenditure of recruitment of experienced employees in the long term is likely to transcend the expenditure of training loyal employees in the beginning. In sum, companies’ focus on experience is indicative of the motivation of producing immediate profits by cutting expenditure in training inexperienced college students. In the long run, companies are likely to bear more cost of high attrition rates. Therefore, companies should not only emphasize on experience and should give opportunities to college graduates so that they can reap long-term profits.
解析 该话题可以有两种不同的观点，采用不同的立意：其一，赞同公司招聘注重经验，指出此举能使公司削减人才培养的开支，有利于公司获得更多利润；其二，反对只注重经验，指出这样不利于公司的长远发展，比如无法使员工认同企业文化，也有可能承受人员不断流动带来的损失。但无论采用哪种立意，都应该恰当运用因果分析、例证和对比等方法，针对不同观点作出合理论证。  
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0jeO777K
0

专业英语八级

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)