首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the United States, there is some disagreement (to say the least) over the risks and benefits .of nuclear power. There can be
In the United States, there is some disagreement (to say the least) over the risks and benefits .of nuclear power. There can be
admin
2011-02-11
68
问题
In the United States, there is some disagreement (to say the least) over the risks and benefits .of nuclear power. There can be no question that with our electrical power needs increasing rapidly, we cannot rely indefinitely on the earth’s remaining fossil fuel supply. The question is, can we safely shift our reliance to nuclear fission power plants—considering the present state of our knowledge and technology? The American public has, in the past few years, developed a rather strong consensus regarding this question. Nuclear power has fallen into disfavor. The risks seem too great, the reward too small—at least for the immediate future.
It is not likely that an explosion of the type produced by atomic bombs can occur in the kinds of nuclear reactors being used today. However, we still don’t know how close we came to a major tragedy at Three Mile Island. A far greater tragedy occurred at a nuclear plant at Chernobyl, in the Soviet Union’s Ukraine in 1986. The risks associated with nuclear power, however, are not always so spectacular. Some are of a far subtler nature. For example, radioactivity could be released into the environment from activities related to mining and processing nuclear fuel, from the transportation and recycling of the fuel and from storage of the radioactive wastes. We frequently hear of steam or gas leaks from the reactors themselves. ;And even the safest reactors normally leak small amounts of radiation into their immediate environment. (The problem with this is that there are no "safe" levels of radioactivity--only "acceptable" levels. )
We could probably greatly reduce the risks associated with nuclear power by simply exercising more care and common sense. There are numerous published accounts that attest to our carelessness, however. For example, it has been revealed that the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant in California was built on an earthquake fault line. At the WNP-2 plant in Washington State, the concrete contained air bubbles and pockets of water as well as shields that had been incorrectly welded. In 1981, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspected forty-three plants that were under construction and rated seven "below average" and thirty-six "average". None were rated even "above average".
Completely apart from the possibility of accidents, there is the unsolved problem of what to do with the radioactive wastes generated in the course of normal nuclear plant reactions. The problem is a tough one since such wastes can only be rendered safe by the passage of time. The waste radioactivity is .generated in the fuel system of the reactors because only a part of the fuel is fissionable and, for technical reasons, not all of the fissionable elements are spent. Much of the spent fuel materials removed from the reactor can be reused. However, some of the radioactive fuel in the spent elements cannot be removed, and this material adds to the radioactive waste.
We have already generated over 10,000 tons of nuclear waste, with another 47,000 tons expected by 19951 Most of the waste is in the form of fuel rods which are, for now, stored in baths filled with a solution of neutron-absorbing boric acid. The problem is that these are only temporary repositories and,’ unless new space is found, existing plants must begin closing for lack of space. The rods can be reprocessed, but the technology could lead to the fuel for nuclear weapons.
The reprocessing also leaves "high-level liquid waste" that must be stored. The prevailing idea at the moment is to dry the liquid and mix it with molten glass that, when it hardens, can be stored in tanks. Suggestions range from burying it in the Antarctic to sending it into space.
Most plants under construction inspected by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission were rated
选项
A、defective
B、below average
C、average
D、above average
答案
C
解析
此题和上题一样,只要阅读够仔细,一定注意到了这句话:In 1981,the Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspected forty-three plants that were under construction and rated seven“below average”and thirty-six“average”.None were rated even“above average”.由此得出结论并不难
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0sYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheStatusofWomeninAncientSocietyInlargepartasaconsequenceofthefeministmovement,historianshavefocusedagre
ClocksthroughTimeIttookhumanbeingalongtimetoinventdiversewaysfortellingtime.About3000yearsagopeoplefir
OncefoundalmostentirelyinthewesternUnitedStatesandinAsia,dinosaurfossilsarenowbeingdiscoveredonallsevencont
OncefoundalmostentirelyinthewesternUnitedStatesandinAsia,dinosaurfossilsarenowbeingdiscoveredonallsevencont
HumanitiesDisciplinesInmanypeople’seyes,thehumanitiesdisciplinesseemtobedyingout.However,actually,students
A、providedbyterroristsB、stolenfromthemilitaryC、madeaccordingtothemethodsshowninInternetD、madeinhislabC
A、TocallthecommunitytodonatemoremoneyafteremergencytakesplaceB、Toprovidefinancialhelpaftertheemergencytakesp
ThefoundersoftheRepublicviewedtheirrevolutionprimarilyinpoliticalratherthaneconomicorsocialterms.Andtheytalke
SymptomsSymptomsoftenappearafterthechildreachestheageofsixmonths.Oneofthefirstsignsispainfulswellingoft
Foradmissionsofficers,reviewingapplicationsislikefinal-examweekforstudentsexceptitlastsformonths.Greatapplicati
随机试题
邓小平强调:毛泽东思想的出发点和根本点是()
单模光纤主模的特点是它的()最低。
__________是主攻某个特殊的细分市场或某一种特殊的产品。
观察营养性缺铁性贫血患儿铁剂疗效,早期最可靠的指标是
泥质防水层施工,应在操作过程中确保掺加膨润土数量准确,拌合均匀,机拌不能少于()遍,含水量最大偏差不宜超过2%,振动压路机碾压控制在4~6遍,碾压密实。
A公司为取得一项用于制造新产品的专利技术进行研究开发活动,月末结转费用化支出的金额。假定每年生产的该新产品在年末全部实现对外销售。各年发生业务如下:(1)2013年1月,研究阶段发生相关人员差旅费15万元,以现金支付。(2)2013年3月,研究
甲、乙、丙和丁有限责任公司(以下简称“丁公司”)共同决定投资设立一普通合伙企业,在商讨合伙协议时,甲、乙、丙和丁公司分别提出自己的观点。 甲提出:以自有的房屋使用权出资,但不办理过户手续。 乙提出:以自有的机器设备出资,作价金额由全体合伙人确定,无须评
某幼儿教师在幼儿园的操场上吸烟。该教师的做法()
行政诉讼中,人民法院审理行政案件,可以参照()。
HowlongdidthefirstThanksgivingDaylast?
最新回复
(
0
)