首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the United States, there is some disagreement (to say the least) over the risks and benefits .of nuclear power. There can be
In the United States, there is some disagreement (to say the least) over the risks and benefits .of nuclear power. There can be
admin
2011-02-11
62
问题
In the United States, there is some disagreement (to say the least) over the risks and benefits .of nuclear power. There can be no question that with our electrical power needs increasing rapidly, we cannot rely indefinitely on the earth’s remaining fossil fuel supply. The question is, can we safely shift our reliance to nuclear fission power plants—considering the present state of our knowledge and technology? The American public has, in the past few years, developed a rather strong consensus regarding this question. Nuclear power has fallen into disfavor. The risks seem too great, the reward too small—at least for the immediate future.
It is not likely that an explosion of the type produced by atomic bombs can occur in the kinds of nuclear reactors being used today. However, we still don’t know how close we came to a major tragedy at Three Mile Island. A far greater tragedy occurred at a nuclear plant at Chernobyl, in the Soviet Union’s Ukraine in 1986. The risks associated with nuclear power, however, are not always so spectacular. Some are of a far subtler nature. For example, radioactivity could be released into the environment from activities related to mining and processing nuclear fuel, from the transportation and recycling of the fuel and from storage of the radioactive wastes. We frequently hear of steam or gas leaks from the reactors themselves. ;And even the safest reactors normally leak small amounts of radiation into their immediate environment. (The problem with this is that there are no "safe" levels of radioactivity--only "acceptable" levels. )
We could probably greatly reduce the risks associated with nuclear power by simply exercising more care and common sense. There are numerous published accounts that attest to our carelessness, however. For example, it has been revealed that the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant in California was built on an earthquake fault line. At the WNP-2 plant in Washington State, the concrete contained air bubbles and pockets of water as well as shields that had been incorrectly welded. In 1981, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspected forty-three plants that were under construction and rated seven "below average" and thirty-six "average". None were rated even "above average".
Completely apart from the possibility of accidents, there is the unsolved problem of what to do with the radioactive wastes generated in the course of normal nuclear plant reactions. The problem is a tough one since such wastes can only be rendered safe by the passage of time. The waste radioactivity is .generated in the fuel system of the reactors because only a part of the fuel is fissionable and, for technical reasons, not all of the fissionable elements are spent. Much of the spent fuel materials removed from the reactor can be reused. However, some of the radioactive fuel in the spent elements cannot be removed, and this material adds to the radioactive waste.
We have already generated over 10,000 tons of nuclear waste, with another 47,000 tons expected by 19951 Most of the waste is in the form of fuel rods which are, for now, stored in baths filled with a solution of neutron-absorbing boric acid. The problem is that these are only temporary repositories and,’ unless new space is found, existing plants must begin closing for lack of space. The rods can be reprocessed, but the technology could lead to the fuel for nuclear weapons.
The reprocessing also leaves "high-level liquid waste" that must be stored. The prevailing idea at the moment is to dry the liquid and mix it with molten glass that, when it hardens, can be stored in tanks. Suggestions range from burying it in the Antarctic to sending it into space.
Most plants under construction inspected by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission were rated
选项
A、defective
B、below average
C、average
D、above average
答案
C
解析
此题和上题一样,只要阅读够仔细,一定注意到了这句话:In 1981,the Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspected forty-three plants that were under construction and rated seven“below average”and thirty-six“average”.None were rated even“above average”.由此得出结论并不难
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0sYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheStatusofWomeninAncientSocietyInlargepartasaconsequenceofthefeministmovement,historianshavefocusedagre
A、TosavemoneyonfoodB、Tobuyfoodwithoutadditives.C、Todoallhisshoppinginoneplace.D、Tomeetotherhealth-conscio
A、Makingadplans.B、Sellingproductssuccessfully.C、Developingnewmarkets.D、Makinganewproduct.C采访的记者专门询问广告人这个问题,所以应该很明显:
Besides"American"characteristics—individualism,self-reliance,informality,punctualityanddirectness,therearealsosome"
Crimehasitsowncycles,amagazinere-portedsomeyearsbefore.Policerecordsthat【M1】______.werestudiedforfiveyearso
FoodandFitness:theAmericanObsessionAmericansseemtobealwaysinahurry,whichhasbecomeone【1】【1】__________
DawnaWalterisoneoftheauthorsleadingthewayinBritainwithherbookthatattemptstohowevenatidy【M1】______sockd
Countriesatalllevelsofeconomicdevelopmentfaceasimilarchallenge:tomaketheirindustriescompetitiveinanincreasingl
ThefounderofBehaviorismis______.
______wasoneofthefoundersofmodernlinguisticsandmadeadistinctionbetweenlangueandparole.
随机试题
损伤初期一般指伤后
确定混凝土配合比的水灰比,必须从混凝土的()考虑。
诊断Χ线机房的副防护应有的铅当量是
关于三羧酸循环的酶,叙述正确的是
(共用备选答案)A.颅内高压与青光眼B.妊娠高血压C.急性皮炎D.经尿道行前列腺切除术E.慢性胆囊炎硫酸镁注射液静脉滴注用于
为新药申报临床研究与申报生产提供必要资料为制剂生产工艺、包装、贮存条件提供科学依据
上市公司募集资金必须存放于公司股东大会决定的专项账户。()
根据下列材料回答问题。2013年1—10月,全国汽车商品累计进出口总额为1307.15亿美元,同比增长2.16%,同比年内首次呈现增长。其中:进口金额664.72亿美元,同比增长0.18%.结束了9月下降趋势;出口金额642.43亿美元,同比增
计算二重积分,其中积分区域D由y轴与曲线围成。
Amtrak—thelargestrailwaycompanyintheU.S.—wasexperiencingadownswinginridership.【C1】______majorconcernstoAmtrakan
最新回复
(
0
)