首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
As the Senate prepares to vote on legislation to empower the Food and Drug Administration to regulate tobacco products, its memb
As the Senate prepares to vote on legislation to empower the Food and Drug Administration to regulate tobacco products, its memb
admin
2021-04-06
38
问题
As the Senate prepares to vote on legislation to empower the Food and Drug Administration to regulate tobacco products, its members would be wise to consult a recent appeals court decision. The decision makes it clear that the tobacco companies have engaged in deceitful and harmful behavior for many decades and cannot be trusted to reform on their own. Regulatory oversight is the best chance to rein them in.
The unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld major elements of a 2006 lower court decision that found big tobacco companies guilty of racketeering and fraud as part of a prolonged campaign to deceive and addict the public. That 1,742-page opinion, rendered by Judge Gladys Kessler, laid out in painstaking detail how the tobacco companies made false statements and suppressed evidence to deny or play down the addictive qualities and the adverse health effects of smoking.
Judge Kessler found that the companies manipulated the design of cigarettes to deliver addictive doses of nicotine, falsely denied that secondhand smoke caused disease and falsely represented that light and low-tar cigarettes presented fewer health risks.
The appeals court not only upheld her decision as legally sound, it seemed deeply impressed by the "volumes of evidence" and "countless examples of deliberately false statements" underlying many of Judge Kessler’s findings. It also upheld some but not all of the marketing restrictions and other requirements she imposed to prevent the companies from making future false claims and engaging in additional fraudulent activities.
The companies protested that they should not be subjected to such requirements because they had already agreed to numerous remedies under a settlement agreement with 46 states and the District of Columbia. The appeals panel was rightly unimpressed. It upheld the district court’s findings that after the settlement went into effect in 1998, the companies almost immediately began to evade and violate various prohibitions against joint activities and false statements.
The House has already voted to give the F.D.A. power to regulate tobacco. Senators, who are getting ready to vote on similar legislation, now have fair warning, if they needed any more, that this is a dishonest industry. It can’t be trusted to behave responsibly or even adhere to agreements it has signed. It is time to grant the F.D.A. the power to regulate the content and marketing of tobacco products.
Why would it be wise for the senators to consult a recent appeals court decision before voting?
选项
A、It reveals to senators tobacco companies’ incompetence in self-discipline.
B、It makes the senators learn how profitable the tobacco industry is.
C、It helps the senators realize the necessity of regulatory oversight.
D、It points out that tobacco companies have been liars for many decades.
答案
C
解析
考查因果细节。根据wise定位到第一段,其中最后一句明确说明对烟草公司进行监管是必要的,可见之所以说这样做是“明智的”,是由于这项裁决能让参观员认识到对烟草行业进行监管的必要性,并促使他们投上赞成票,故C项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/101Z777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Today,some30%ofsmallbusinessownersdon’thaveaWebpresenceatall,whilethevastmajoritywhodoarewatchingtheirsit
It’slongbeenknown,butlittlediscussedinpolitehigh-techcircles,thatinformation-agetechnologyisnotthecleanindustr
SupposeyouwanttosendyourfriendMurphyagifttothankhimforhelpingyouwithyourstudy.Writehimaletterto1)in
美国的知识分子——2006年英译汉及详解IsittruethattheAmericanintellectualisrejectedandconsideredofnoaccountinhissociety?Iamgo
ItisacherishedBrusselsmaximthattheEuropeanUniontakesitsgreatestleapsforwardsinacrisis—andthenonlyafterseve
BernardBailynhasrecentlyreinterpretedtheearlyhistoryoftheUnitedStatesbyapplyingnewsocialresearchfindingsonthe
By1830theformerSpanishandPortuguesecolonieshadbecomeindependentnations.Theroughly20million【C1】______ofthesenati
PresidentBarackObamaclaimedprogressWednesdayinhissecond-termdrivetocombatclimatechangebutsaidmoremustbedonet
Oneofthemisconceptionsaboutelitesportisthatgreatathleteshavenothingincommonwithnormalhumanbeings.【C1】______the
随机试题
邓某经所在区工商局批准开了一家书店,一日当地一工商所人员丁某来到邓某的店里说:"有人举报称你经营淫秽书刊,现要对你罚款"。邓某再三解释也于事无补,无奈之下,当场交了1000元罚款,亦未收到罚单。事后,邓某向有关机关申请复议,丁某得知复议人员是自己的好友匡某
二氧化碳测定仪是以()为基础设计的,可检测出瓶装啤酒中瓶颈空气及二氧化碳含量。
失血性休克补充血容量是为了()。
某育肥猪群,部分猪出现消瘦、咳嗽、打喷嚏、腹式呼吸等症状,X线检查见肺部有云絮状阴影,剖检病死猪见肺心叶、尖叶上胰样病灶。治疗该病应选用的药物是
某被告不服一审法院驳回管辖异议的裁定提起上诉,在此期间,一审原告向一审法院提出撤诉申请。根据民事诉讼法的规定,正确的作法是()。
ARROW评级体系中风险评估的内容主要包括可能影响银行的外部风险。()
洗钱者通过金融机构洗钱的技巧包括()
求助者的社会接纳程度也可以看作是()。
一般资料:求助者,女性,42岁,已婚,大学文化程度,某公司业务经理。案例介绍:求助者父母的家在郊区,自己结婚后在市内购房生活,平时与父母、哥哥、姐姐的关系很融洽。因城市改造,求助者父母的房子被拆迁了,得到了两套房子和大笔拆迁款。求助者的父母自己住
因甲市某区阳光小区进行旧城改造,区政府作出《关于做好阳光小区旧城改造房屋拆迁补偿安置工作的通知》,王某等人对该通知不服,向区政府申请行政复议,要求撤销该通知。区政府作出《行政复议告知书》,告知王某等人向甲市政府申请复议。甲市政府作出《行政复议决定书》,认为
最新回复
(
0
)