首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
32
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on ______. ( )
选项
A、how well they get along with the students
B、how well they give their lectures
C、how many papers and books they have published
D、how well they conduct their academic researches.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/15qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Johnpromisedtokeephismother______ofhowthingsweregoingonwhenhestudiedinEngland.
Everyonewantstobehealthyandhappy.【B1】,illnessoraccidentsmayoccurwithoutanywarning.Frequentlythepersonwhois
WhendidFather’sDayofficiallybegintohavenationalpopularity?WhatwasthefirstreactionoftheBritishpublictowardsF
WhendidFather’sDayofficiallybegintohavenationalpopularity?WhofirststartedtheideaofholdingtheFather’sDay?
Parentsshouldn’t______(favorable)oneoftheirchildrenmorethantheothers.
Accordingtotheauthor,feelingdepressedis______.Thephenomenonthattoday’schildrenseemadult-likeisattributedbythe
Choosethecorrectstatement.Whichhappenedlast?
Whatkindsofthingshaveactivistsdonetoprotectresearchanimals?Whatwillhappeniftheresearchersdon’tmeetthedemand
Youarerequiredtowriteacompositiononthefollowingtopicwithin30minutes:CompetitionandCooperationbasedontheoutli
Annprefershiking______thecinema.
随机试题
2008年7月,甲、乙两公司签订一份买卖合同。按照合同约定,双方已于2008年8月底前各自履行了合同义务的50%,并应于2008年年底将各自剩余的50%的合同义务履行完毕。2008年10月,人民法院受理了债务人甲公司的破产申请。2008年10月31日,甲公
《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》适用范围排除的国际性货物买卖包括【】
关于胎动不正确的是
关于CT最大密度投影(MIP)的概念,正确的为
我国目前会计工作的自律管理组织主要包括()。
根据以下资料回答下列问题。2008年全年居民消费价格总水平上涨5.6%,其中食品类上涨13.2%。工业品出厂价格上涨3.1%,其中生产资料上涨3.7%,生活资料上涨2.0%。原材料、燃料、动力购进价格上涨7.9%,其中燃料、动力类上涨15.1%,黑色金属
设文本框的PasswordChar属性被设置为“%”。程序运行时,在文本框中输入了“OK”,则产生的结果是()。
在考生文件夹下新建名为BOOT.TXT的新空文件。
Therearethreeseparatesourcesofhazard【1】totheuseofnuclearreactiontosupplyuswithenergy.Firstly,theradioactivem
Thevaseheboughtatthestreetmarketyesterdaywasa_______forgery.
最新回复
(
0
)