首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Imagine being able to travel from New York to Los Angeles without having to step on a plane, yet be able to do so in a fraction
Imagine being able to travel from New York to Los Angeles without having to step on a plane, yet be able to do so in a fraction
admin
2021-09-25
56
问题
Imagine being able to travel from New York to Los Angeles without having to step on a plane, yet be able to do so in a fraction of the time it would take to drive. Last month a new Japanese maglev train reached a top speed of close to 400 mph, breaking its own world record in the process. And the sight of futuristic looking trains whizzing past platforms at hundreds of miles per hour isn’t confined to Japan: China, France and Spain, to name a few, have their own high-speed rail networks. Indeed, while these bullet trains may look futuristic, they have been around for decades; they’re a tried and tested technology that the Japanese debuted over 50 years ago.
So surely it’s only a matter of time before large numbers of U. S. passengers are doing a daily commute to New York from Washington and Boston in about the time it would take them to drive to work in their own cities, right? Not anytime soon. While several countries have undertaken the tough work of raising the money to invest in bullet trains, it’s unlikely the United States will ever see the vast network of high-speed trains that blanket other countries. Indeed, passenger rail service in the United States lags behind much of the rest of the developed world.
Much of the United States is not exactly an ideal market for high-speed rail. Compared to places where rail really flourishes—Japan and Western Europe, for instance—-the United States is geographically vast. As a result, in much of the country, cities are far enough apart that air travel provides significant time savings, even compared to some of the fastest trains.
The layout of cities matters, too. When you arrive in Tokyo, Paris or Barcelona, it’s often convenient and even pleasant to walk to your final destination. When it’s not, a fast and frequent mass transportation system awaits to whisk you away. This is not the case in many American cities, where arriving by train typically means jumping into a cab or renting a car for the last leg of your journey. Simply put, in many sprawling U. S. cities, getting to your destination by train can still mean you’ve got quite a way yet to get home. We could change that. And we probably should. But we’re not there yet.
The Northeast Corridor (Boston-New York-Washington) comes in at the top of just about every list of potential candidates for high-speed rail, with the distances involved being considered within the "Goldilocks" zone for fast trains. For example, at just over 200 miles from New York to both Boston and Washington, fast trains could compete with even faster airplanes by offering centrally located stations and providing an alternative to the hassle of airport security lines. These cities are dense, have strong downtowns, and extensive mass transit systems once you arrive.
However, the biggest barrier to improved rail service in the United States is simply the lack of political will. At the federal level, support for passenger rail service has languished and Washington has devolved decision-making (and increasingly, funding) to the states. With the nation’s transportation trust fund nearly broke and no permanent solution in sight, it seems unlikely the federal government will champion high-speed rail—a costly endeavor—in the near future.
All this points to how high-speed rail will likely progress in the United States; piecemeal. It is doubtful that we will have a nationwide system of fast trains soon. And this is not necessarily a bad thing; through a combination of private and public action, we should target markets where highspeed rail makes sense. That means looking for shorter corridors connecting dense places with existing mass transit infrastructure.
The author uses the example of Tokyo, Paris or Barcelona to show that ________.
选项
A、traffic congestion is a huge problem in many American cities
B、the last mile challenge for passengers hinders the development of bullet trains in the US
C、the horrible layout of American cities demands radical and urgent changes
D、the US should expand investment in urban mass transportation system
答案
D
解析
例证题。根据题干关键词Tokyo,Paris or Barcelona定位到第四段。第四段中主要对比了美国城市和东京、巴黎或巴塞罗那这些地方的城市布局,在东京、巴黎或巴塞罗那,从火车站步行到最终目的地通常很方便舒适,公共交通系统也很便利。对比的目的主要是突出在美国的许多大城市里,从火车站到达目的地要乘坐出租车或租车,“最后一英里”很难走,因此选[B],the last mile与文中的last leg of your journey是同义表达。[A][C][D]文中都没有提到。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/171Z777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Thehumannoseisanunderratedtool.Humansareoftenthoughttobeinsensitivesmellerscomparedwithanimals,【C1】______this
Thehumannoseisanunderratedtool.Humansareoftenthoughttobeinsensitivesmellerscomparedwithanimals,【C1】______this
Thehumannoseisanunderratedtool.Humansareoftenthoughttobeinsensitivesmellerscomparedwithanimals,【C1】______this
Researchonanimalintelligencealwaysmakesmewonderjusthowsmarthumansare.【C1】______thefruit-flyexperimentsdescribed
Thoughnotbiologicallyrelated,friendsareas"related"asfourthcousins,sharingabout1%ofgenes.Thatis【C1】______astudy
Thoughnotbiologicallyrelated,friendsareas"related"asfourthcousins,sharingabout1%ofgenes.Thatis【C1】______astudy
"MoneyMattersonCampus"isarecentlyreleasedstudyonfinancialliteracyamongyoungadults.Itsupportsprovidingstudents
Expressionismisanartisticstyleinwhichtheartistseekstodepictnotobjectiverealitybutratherthesubjectiveemotions
Hedidn’t______meforreturninghismoneythatIfound.
随机试题
A.发热B.咳嗽C.咯血D.肺部啰音E.痰液检查慢性支气管炎与肺结核的主要鉴别依据是
下列内容不属于药物化学研究的是()
下列关于刑事案件级别管辖的规定,说法错误的是:()
背景资料:某机电设备安装公司经邀请招标投标,获得某10000t/d水泥熟料生产线的机电设备安装工程的总承包资格,并与业主签订了施工合同。合同规定工程范围、工期、质量标准、安全环境要求。其中质量标准和要求按部颁标准执行,主要材料如钢材、电缆、管道阀
机关、团体、事业单位应当至少()进行一次防火检查。
仅在年金领取人生存期间定期给付的年金是()。
贯穿丰田生产方式的两大支柱是准时化和()。
下列项目免征企业所得税的是()。
现阶段,我国城乡之间在生产力水平、就业结构、收入水平等方面都存在着很大的差别,农村经济的现代化、社会化都还有一个漫长的过程。广大农村在近期尚不具备国家统一立法、强制实行社会保险制度的条件,不能照搬城乡企业的办法。广大农民仍应坚持家庭养老邻里互助等好的传统做
2017年5月14日,习近平在“一带一路”国际合作高峰论坛开幕式上发表演讲时指出,我们要将“一带一路”建成和平之路。我们要构建以合作共赢为核心的新型国际关系,打造对话不对抗、结伴不结盟的伙伴关系。各国应该尊重彼此主权、尊严、领土完整,尊重彼此发展道路和社会
最新回复
(
0
)