首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthroug
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthroug
admin
2013-11-30
103
问题
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthrough in science poses a new problem—whether it’ s safe for people to eat them. Experts say that much of the current angst over genetically modified foods is unnecessary. If research and development are allowed to continue, the products will be there for all to appreciate.
New varieties of rice and other crops, resistant to insects and diseases, will have replaced those cultivated today. Farmers will no longer lose substantial proportions of their harvests. The impact of these advances will be felt in the less developed countries. Health benefits will also come from plants genetically engineered to be more balanced nutritionally than those that have evolved through natural selection or been bred by traditional methods.
The potential medical spin-offs from plant biotechnology are considerable. A new generation of more potent vaccines, many against illness for which no vaccines have been available, will be grown in plants such as maize and bananas.
Malnutrition could be banished. Biotechnology can improve efficiency of food production and generate more nourishing crops.
Throughout the world, gardeners, vegetarians, and consumers will benefit from plant varieties resistant to spoilage, foods which reduce our dependence on animals, and cheaper and/or tastier products.
We should not, however, overlook potential hazards in altering our diets by genetic engineering. As with all other applications of science to human welfare, biotechnology is likely to have risks. Mistakes will probably be made.
Nevertheless, any analysis of the new techniques for ferrying genes between plants must surely conclude that they are being applied and controlled more stringently than any technology ever before.
Nearly 25 years ago, when scientists first learned to combine DNA from different sources, commentators warned of the iniquity of "opening Pandora’ s box". Among their horrific forecast were unstoppable epidemics and worldwide pestilence. None of these has come to pass, partly because genetic manipulation has not proved inherently dangerous.
In addition, regulatory committees have been set up to ensure that experiments are conducted in appropriately safe conditions.
The regulators’ task is not simply to allow research to go ahead unless potential hazards are obvious. It is to consider risks that could come to light later. Will a gene, introduced intorape to protect it against virus attack, also make the pollen grains more likely to cause hay fever? All proposals have to survive positive vetting of this sort before they are sanctioned.
Genetic engineering is far more precise—and thus predictable—than the gene movements which occur in nature. When plants fertilize and cross-fertilize in the wild, large numbers of genes are transferred in a haphazard fashion.
Biotechnology allows individual genes to be moved with precision from one plant to another. It is much easier to know how one gene will work in its new setting. The likelihood of unexpected consequences and the margin of error are correspondingly reduced. There is a chance, however remote, that a gene introduced into a particular plant at one time and location might have adverse consequences if it eventually gets into another plant distant in space and time.
Given the astronomical amount of random gene transfer which occurs through the biosphere such extreme caution is unwarranted. I believe most food producers—and eaters—would agree.
In his defense of genetic technology, the author shows us the benefits produced by genetic technology EXCEPT in______.
选项
A、high-tech
B、health
C、medicine
D、agrarian production
答案
A
解析
文章第二段提到New varieties of rice and other crops可以抵御昆虫和疾病以及基因作物营养更加均衡,体现了health benefits,排除B项。第三段提到medical spin-offs,通过植入一种更有效的疫苗,玉米、香蕉等可以against illness for which no vaccineshave been available,体现了C、D项。A项“高科技”文章并未提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/1CU3777K
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
有关非ST段抬高心肌梗死的治疗方案,以下哪项正确
Justbeforedawnwereceivedacallthatanunresponsiveinfantwasbeingbroughtbyemergencymedicalservicestoourhospital.
Imagineadiseasespreadingacrosstheglobe,killingmostlymiddle-agedpeopleorleavingthemchronicallydisabled.Thenoned
A、Peoplewerebetteroff.B、Thegovernmentfailedtopersuadepeoplefromdrinking.C、Thereappearedanewcheapdrink.D、Drinke
A、Buyapurse.B、BuytheAIDSpatientsmedicine.C、Makeadonation.D、Lendthemansomemoney.C男士讲自己正在为艾滋病人筹集款项,女士让他等一下,她去取钱包,这
Manyprofessorsencouragestudentstoquestionand______theirideas.
Twelvehoursaweekseemedagenerous______ofyourtimetothenursinghome.
A、Itfeelsasiftheroomisgoingaround.B、Itfeelslikeakindofunsteadiness.C、Itfeelsasifsheisfallingdown.D、Itfe
A、Shedoesn’thavesomuchmoney.B、Sheconsidersthepricereasonable.C、Shebuysverylittlechocolate.D、Sheagreeswiththe
Todaywemakeroomforaremarkablynarrowrangeofpersonalitystyles.We’retoldthattobegreatistobebold,tobehappyi
随机试题
将员工的绩效具体化为员工愿意接受的利益,并对不能实现企业知识管理目标的员工进行处罚的是()
()是指某种房地产在市场上的一般、平均水平价格,是该类房地产大量成交价格的抽象结果。
制造设备在深冷操作中可使用()。
甲公司为增值税一般纳税人,适用的增值税税率为17%,所得税税率为25%,假定销售商品,原材料和提供劳务均符合收入确认条件,其成本在确认收入时逐笔结转,商品、原材料售价中不含增值税。2014年甲公司发生如下交易或事项:(1)3月1日,向乙公司销售商品一批,
某国反对开发泥煤的人认为,这样做会改变富含泥煤的湿地地区的生态平衡,从而会使某国的大量的饮用水源受到污染。但这并不是真的。以爱尔兰为例,泥煤已被开采了数个世纪,水源并没有受到污染,所以某国也可以安全地开采。以下哪项如果为真,最强地支持了上文的论述?
体育竞技掺人越来越多的经济利益,会驱使一些人走向极端。虽然目前运动员的自然能力仍占主导,但是如果有一天科技手段足以超越自然赋予的力量,运动员在日常不需要严格洲练,而是通过仪器、手术来增强体质,这与驾驶着摩托车去参加百米竞赛是否还有本质区别?这不仅是抛给体育
近期网上流传一种观点,认为暴利的眼镜行业造就了99%的近视眼。一些网友称商家只会一味推销眼镜,其实近视后视力仍可恢复,但眼镜戴了就摘不下来了,因此能不戴眼镜尽量不要戴。这引发不少人对眼镜店唯利是图、赚取暴利的斥责,进而引起关于“越戴眼镜越近视”的讨论。然而
《论六家要旨》的作者是:_______。
普通合伙人的出资方式有()(2010年法学基础课多选第30题)
Closeness,forexample,indicatesintimacyorthreattomanyspeakerswhilstdistancemaydenoteformalityoralackofinteres
最新回复
(
0
)