首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthroug
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthroug
admin
2013-11-30
81
问题
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthrough in science poses a new problem—whether it’ s safe for people to eat them. Experts say that much of the current angst over genetically modified foods is unnecessary. If research and development are allowed to continue, the products will be there for all to appreciate.
New varieties of rice and other crops, resistant to insects and diseases, will have replaced those cultivated today. Farmers will no longer lose substantial proportions of their harvests. The impact of these advances will be felt in the less developed countries. Health benefits will also come from plants genetically engineered to be more balanced nutritionally than those that have evolved through natural selection or been bred by traditional methods.
The potential medical spin-offs from plant biotechnology are considerable. A new generation of more potent vaccines, many against illness for which no vaccines have been available, will be grown in plants such as maize and bananas.
Malnutrition could be banished. Biotechnology can improve efficiency of food production and generate more nourishing crops.
Throughout the world, gardeners, vegetarians, and consumers will benefit from plant varieties resistant to spoilage, foods which reduce our dependence on animals, and cheaper and/or tastier products.
We should not, however, overlook potential hazards in altering our diets by genetic engineering. As with all other applications of science to human welfare, biotechnology is likely to have risks. Mistakes will probably be made.
Nevertheless, any analysis of the new techniques for ferrying genes between plants must surely conclude that they are being applied and controlled more stringently than any technology ever before.
Nearly 25 years ago, when scientists first learned to combine DNA from different sources, commentators warned of the iniquity of "opening Pandora’ s box". Among their horrific forecast were unstoppable epidemics and worldwide pestilence. None of these has come to pass, partly because genetic manipulation has not proved inherently dangerous.
In addition, regulatory committees have been set up to ensure that experiments are conducted in appropriately safe conditions.
The regulators’ task is not simply to allow research to go ahead unless potential hazards are obvious. It is to consider risks that could come to light later. Will a gene, introduced intorape to protect it against virus attack, also make the pollen grains more likely to cause hay fever? All proposals have to survive positive vetting of this sort before they are sanctioned.
Genetic engineering is far more precise—and thus predictable—than the gene movements which occur in nature. When plants fertilize and cross-fertilize in the wild, large numbers of genes are transferred in a haphazard fashion.
Biotechnology allows individual genes to be moved with precision from one plant to another. It is much easier to know how one gene will work in its new setting. The likelihood of unexpected consequences and the margin of error are correspondingly reduced. There is a chance, however remote, that a gene introduced into a particular plant at one time and location might have adverse consequences if it eventually gets into another plant distant in space and time.
Given the astronomical amount of random gene transfer which occurs through the biosphere such extreme caution is unwarranted. I believe most food producers—and eaters—would agree.
In his defense of genetic technology, the author shows us the benefits produced by genetic technology EXCEPT in______.
选项
A、high-tech
B、health
C、medicine
D、agrarian production
答案
A
解析
文章第二段提到New varieties of rice and other crops可以抵御昆虫和疾病以及基因作物营养更加均衡,体现了health benefits,排除B项。第三段提到medical spin-offs,通过植入一种更有效的疫苗,玉米、香蕉等可以against illness for which no vaccineshave been available,体现了C、D项。A项“高科技”文章并未提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/1CU3777K
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
患者上腹被汽车撞伤3小时,面色苍白,四肢厥冷,血压50/35mmHg,脉搏:118次/分,全腹压痛及反跳痛。目前应考虑该患者最可能的诊断是
Ihadneverbeeninthepublicwardofahospitalbefore,anditwasmyfirstexperienceofdoctorswhohandleyouwithoutspeak
Confrontedwithpatientfacingdeath,physiciansmayfeelasenseofmedicalimpotenceandfailure.Yearsoftrainingandzealt
A、Heshouldgotothelibrary.B、Heshouldturntohisprofessorforhelpduringofficehours.C、Heshouldsetofficehoursfor
Biotechnologyisexpectedtobringimportantadvancesinmedicaldiagnosisandtherapy,insolvingfoodproblems,inenergysavi
Preventionisalwayspreferabletoacure,andwhilemuchofthedataarestillpreliminary,agrowingbodyofevidencesuggests
A、Bellevuewasahospital.B、Bellevuewasagovernment.C、Bellevuewasauniversity.D、Bellevuewasawomen’sprison.A从“Whenre
Todaywemakeroomforaremarkablynarrowrangeofpersonalitystyles.We’retoldthattobegreatistobebold,tobehappyi
The______wasthat,ifyouhadtoabandonshipandhadtimetoputonadrysuit,itwouldbeanexcellentaidtoself-preservati
随机试题
驾驶机动车在学校附近遇到这种情况要尽快加速通过。
长管的水力计算公式中,对于层流流态,系数β常数为()。
华北平原直接与长江中下游平原相连,这一平原可分为________、________、________。
患者,男性,24岁。溺水后胸闷、气促2小时来院。查体:神志清,呼吸急促,35次/分,双肺可闻及广泛湿啰音。鼻导管吸氧时动脉血气分析显示pH7.50,PaO248mmHg,PaCO228mmHg,考虑并发急性呼吸窘迫综合征。导致ARDS的主要病理改变
下列不符合正常骨髓象特征的是
凡是两种不同金属的接触面之间,除不锈钢外,都应加(),以防止产生双金属腐蚀。
评价幼儿绘画作品的主要标志是()
122,342,626,242,()。
TherearemanymethodsintheCPETT.OneofthemisthemethodthatrunsaKernelastheloadofacomputer.Sowecallit
AstudyconductedbyanAustralianscienceagencyhasdiscoveredsignsthatthecountry’sancientAboriginesmayhavebeenthew
最新回复
(
0
)