首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another case of experience changing the brain. From the senso
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another case of experience changing the brain. From the senso
admin
2012-04-23
35
问题
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another case of experience changing the brain. From the sensory information we absorb to the movements we make, our lives leave footprints on the bumps and fissures of our cortex, so much so that experiences can alter "hard-wired" brain structures. Through rehab, stroke patients can coax a region of the motor cortex on the opposite side of the damaged region to pinch-hit, restoring lost mobility; volunteers who are blindfolded for just five days can reprogram their visual cortex to process sound and touch.
Still, scientists have been surprised at how deeply culture—the language we speak, the values we absorb—shapes the brain, and are rethinking findings derived from studies of Westerners. To take one recent example, a region behind the forehead called the medial prefrontal cortex supposedly represents the self: it is active when we ("we" being the Americans in the study) think of our own identity and traits. But with Chinese volunteers, the results were strikingly different. The "me" circuit hummed not only when they thought whether a particular adjective described themselves, but also when they considered whether it described their mother. The Westerners showed no such overlap between self and mom. Depending whether one lives in a culture that views the self as autonomous and unique or as connected to and part of a larger whole, this neural circuit takes on quite different functions.
"Cultural neuroscience," as this new field is called, is about discovering such differences. Some of the findings, as with the "me/mom" circuit, buttress longstanding notions of cultural differences. For instance, it is a cultural cliché that Westerners focus on individual objects while East Asians pay attention to context and background (another manifestation of the individualism-collectivism split). Sure enough, when shown complex, busy scenes, Asian-Americans and non-Asian—Americans recruited different brain regions. The Asians showed more activity in areas that process figure-ground relations—holistic context—while the Americans showed more activity in regions that recognize objects.
Psychologist Nalini Ambady of Tufts found something similar when she and colleagues showed drawings of people in a submissive pose (head down, shoulders hunched) or a dominant one (arms crossed, face forward) to Japanese and Americans. The brain’s dopamine-fueled reward circuit became most active at the sight of the stance—dominant for Americans, submissive for Japanese—that each volunteer’s culture most values, they reported in 2009. This raises an obvious chicken-and-egg question.
Cultural neuroscience wouldn’t be making waves if it found neurobiological bases only for well-known cultural differences. It is also uncovering the unexpected. For instance, a 2006 study found that native Chinese speakers use a different region of the brain to do simple arithmetic (3+ 4) or decide which number is larger than native English speakers do, even though both use Arabic numerals. The Chinese use the circuits that process visual and spatial information and plan movements (the latter may be related to the use of the abacus). But English speakers use language circuits. It is as if the West Conceives numbers as just words, but the East imbues them with symbolic, spatial freight. "One would think that neural processes involving basic mathematical computations are universal," says Ambady, but they "seem to be culture-specific. "
Not to be the skunk at this party, but I think it’s important to ask whether neuroscience reveals anything more than we already know from, say, anthropology. For instance, it’s well known that East Asian cultures prize the collective over the individual, and that Americans do the opposite.
Ambady thinks cultural neuroscience does advance understanding. Take the me/mom finding, which, she argues, "attests to the strength of the overlap between self and people close to you in collectivistic cultures and the separation in individualistic cultures. It is important to push the analysis to the level of the brain. " Especially when it shows how fundamental cultural differences are—so fundamental, perhaps, that "universal" notions such as human rights, democracy, and the like may be no such thing.
What does "buttress" mean in the third paragraph?
选项
A、contradict
B、doubt
C、are unrelated to
D、support
答案
D
解析
原文第二段中the“me/mom”circuit的发现,表明文化背景和价值观会改变大脑结构。所以第三段中的“buttress”应该指“支持、强化”之意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/1GiO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Canada’sEducationSystemTheCanadiangovernmentprovides【1】publiceducationforallstudentsfromKindergartentoGrade12.
LanguageFamiliesAllofthelanguageswithinalanguagefamilyare【1】andallofthemhaveasimilarhistory.Let’stakeabr
InBritaintherealcenterofpoliticallifeisin______.
Normallyastudentmustattendacertainnumberofcoursesinordertograduate,andeachcoursewhichheattendsandgiveshim
WhichofthefollowingisNOTwrittenbyEdgarAllaPoe?
WhichofthefollowingisNOTwrittenbyEdgarAllaPoe?
Universitiesarenolongerrelativelyemptyinsummer.Asthestudentsmoveout,holiday-makersmove,eventothemostunl
推进产业结构优化升级,形成以高新技术产业为先导、基础产业和制造业为支撑、服务业全面发展的产业格局。优先发展信息产业,在经济和社会领域广泛应用信息技术。积极发展对经济增长有突破性重大带动作用的高新技术产业。用高新技术和先进适用技术改造传统产业,大力振兴装备制
Realizingthathehadn’tenoughmoneyandnotwantedtoborrowformhisfather,hedecidedtosellhiswatch.
随机试题
分析器乐合奏曲《喜洋洋》(片段)。要求:简要说明各声部之间的关系。
微分方程y"一4y=4的通解是()(C1,C2为任意常数)。
根据《行政诉讼法》及司法解释,下列行为中,不属于税务行政诉讼受案范围的是()。
甲、乙双方签订一份建造1万平方米商品房的合同,由此形成的经济法律关系客体就是乙方承建的该1万平方米商品房。( )
治安行政管理工作是公安机关运用国家赋予的(),依据法律、法规从事行政管理方面的各项业务工作。
若圆(x-3)2+(y+5)2=r2上有且只有两个点到直线4x-3y=2的距离等于1,则半径r取值范围是()。
下列叙述中正确的是
下列关于世界上第一台电子计算机ENIAC的叙述中,错误的是___________。
A、Yes,Itis.B、No,itisn’t.C、They’reourbooks.C
ThefollowingitemshavebeendestroyedEXCEPT?
最新回复
(
0
)