首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. A)A simple idea underli
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. A)A simple idea underli
admin
2014-12-12
12
问题
How science goes wrong
Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself.
A)A simple idea underlies science: "trust, but verify". Results should always be subject to challenge from experiment. That simple but powerful idea has generated a vast body of knowledge. Since its birth in the 17th century, modern science has changed the world beyond recognition, and overwhelmingly for the better. But success can breed extreme self-satisfaction. Modern scientists are doing too much trusting and not enough verifying, damaging the whole of science, and of humanity. B)Too many of the findings are the result of cheap experiments or poor analysis. A rule of thumb among biotechnology venture-capitalists is that half of published research cannot be replicated(复制). Even that may be optimistic. Last year researchers at one biotech firm, Amgen, found they could reproduce just six of 53 "milestone" studies in cancer research. Earlier, a group at Bayer, a drug company, managed to repeat just a quarter of 67 similarly important papers. A leading computer scientist worries that three-quarters of papers in his subfield are nonsense. In 2000-10, roughly 80,000 patients took part in clinical trials based on research that was later withdrawn because of mistakes or improperness.
What a load of rubbish
C)Even when flawed research does not put people’s lives at risk—and much of it is too far from the market to do so—it blows money and the efforts of some of the world’s best minds. The opportunity costs of hindered progress are hard to quantify, but they are likely to be vast. And they could be rising.
D)One reason is the competitiveness of science. In the 1950s, when modern academic research took shape after its successes in the Second World War, it was still a rarefied(小众的)pastime. The entire club of scientists numbered a few hundred thousand. As their ranks have swelled to 6m -7m active researchers on the latest account, scientists have lost their taste for self-policing and quality control. The obligation to "publish or perish(消亡)" has come to rule over academic life. Competition for jobs is cut-throat. Full professors in America earned on average $135,000 in 2012—more than judges did. Every year six freshly minted PhDs strive for every academic post. Nowadays verification(the replication of other people’s results)does little to advance a researcher’s career. And without verification, uncertain findings live on to mislead.
E)Careerism also encourages exaggeration and the choose-the-most-profitable of results. In order to safeguard their exclusivity, the leading journals impose high rejection rates: in excess of 90% of submitted manuscripts. The most striking findings have the greatest chance of making it onto the page. Little wonder that one in three researchers knows of a colleague who has polished a paper by, say, excluding inconvenient data from results based on his instinct, And as more research teams around the world work on a problem, it is more likely that at least one will fall prey to an honest confusion between the sweet signal of a genuine discovery and a nut of the statistical noise. Such lake correlations are often recorded in journals eager for startling papers. If they touch on drinking wine, or letting children play video games, they may well command the front pages of newspapers, too.
F)Conversely, failures to prove a hypothesis(假设)are rarely even offered for publication, let alone accepted. "Negative results" now account for only 14% of published papers, down from 30% in 1990. Yet knowing what is false is as important to science as knowing what is true. The failure to report failures means that researchers waste money and effort exploring blind alleys already investigated by other scientists.
G)The holy process of peer review is not all it is praised to be, either. When a prominent medical journal ran research past other experts in the field, it found that most of the reviewers failed to spot mistakes it had deliberately inserted into papers, even after being told they were being tested.
If it’s broke, fix it
H)All this makes a shaky foundation for an enterprise dedicated to discovering the truth about the world. What might be done to shore it up? One priority should be for all disciplines to follow the example of those that have done most to tighten standards. A start would be getting to grips with statistics, especially in the growing number of fields that screen through untold crowds of data looking for patterns. Geneticists have done this, and turned an early stream of deceptive results from genome sequencing(基因组测序)into a flow of truly significant ones.
I)Ideally, research protocols(草案)should be registered in advance and monitored in virtual notebooks. This would curb the temptation to manipulate the experiment’s design midstream so as to make the results look more substantial than they are.(It is already meant to happen in clinical trials of drugs.)
Where possible, trial data also should be open for other researchers to inspect and test.
J)The most enlightened journals are already showing less dislike of tedious papers. Some government funding agencies, including America’s National Institutes of Health, which give out $30 billion on research each year, are working out how best to encourage replication. And growing numbers of scientists, especially young ones, understand statistics. But these trends need to go much further. Journals should allocate space for "uninteresting" work, and grant-givers should set- aside money to pay for it. Peer review should be tightened—or perhaps dispensed with altogether, in favour of post-publication evaluation in the form of appended comments. That system has worked well in recent years in physics and mathematics. Lastly, policymakers should ensure that institutions using public money also respect the rules.
K)Science still commands enormous—if sometimes perplexed—respect. But its privileged status is founded on the capacity to be right most of the time and to correct its mistakes when it gets things wrong. And it is not as if the universe is short of genuine mysteries to keep generations of scientists hard at work. The false trails laid down by cheap research are an unforgivable barrier to understanding.
Registered and monitored research protocols would help to resist the temptation to manipulate the experiment’s design.
选项
答案
I
解析
本题涉及对于目前学术论文问题的解决办法,可知答案应在If it’s broke,fix it标题下的内容查找。由Registered and monitored research protocols,manipulate和experiment’s design可定位到I段。原文提到理想状态下采用注册(registered)及通过虚拟记录簿监控(monitored in virtual notebooks)来确保草案不被任意更改,这可抑制学术造假的诱惑(curb the temptation to manipulate the experiment’s design…),本题与I段第1句相符,故选I。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/1Iq7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、MeetThomas.B、FollowThomas.C、AnnoyThomas.D、CallThomas.D
ThefederalautomobileefficiencystandardsannouncedthisweekareanimportantsteponAmerica’spathtoalower-carbonandmo
Weallliketofeelneeded.Butnewresearchsuggestshavingasenseofpurposeisgoodforourhealth,too.Inastudyof7
Mostofuswouldshyawayfrommakingpurchasesinaforeigncountryifwedidn’tknowtheexchangerate.Yet,ifprivacyisthe
Whenyou’rethenewgirlatwork,youdoeverythinginyourpowertostayonyourbestbehavior.You【C1】______uptotheofficee
InastudypublishedWednesday,collegestudentswhowereaskedtocompleteanagrams(字谜)whileanearbyresearchertalkedonher
中国经济的高速发展,带来了消费文化的日益流行,同时也催生了一批具有高学历,充分享受资本主义消费模式的年轻人,他们习惯于当月工资当月花。因而被称为“月光族”(themoonlightgroup)。“月光族”一词出现于20世纪90年代后期,是用来讽刺那些出
A、Theyhavebecomepopular.B、Theyarelikelytobemade.C、Theyareinusenow.D、Theywillnotbemade.B男士说人们还没有用纸制造飞机和轿车,但假以
Learningtoplayamusicalinstrumentcanchangeyourbrain,withaUSreviewfindingmusictrainingcanleadtoimprovedspeech
UniversitiesBranchOutA)Asneverbeforeintheirlonghistory,universitieshavebecomeinstrumentsofnationalcompetitiona
随机试题
A.甘油B.3一磷酸甘油C.3一磷酸甘油醛D.1,3一二磷酸甘油酸属于脂肪组织中合成甘油三酯的原料是
Animalsaredividedintomanygroups.Somegroupsofanimalsincludethe,insects,fish,amphibians,reptiles,birdsandmammals
患者,男,56岁。缺失,松动Ⅰ度,无牙体疾患,无倾斜扭转,X线显示牙槽骨水平吸收,根分叉区未破坏。健康。行双端固定桥修复。正确的处理是
某项目借款2000万元,借款期限3年,年利率为6%。若每半年计复利一次,则实际年利率会高出名义利率()。
对于市场化动作的()等项目,通过经济分析来论证项目的经济价值,为制定财务方案提供依据。
教师对学生的表扬是一种激发学生学习的正诱因。()
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入括号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
“长征二号F”火箭的总设计师刘竹生为了实现我国“可上九天揽月”的强国梦,四十年如一日,夜以继日、勤奋工作,攻克了一个个技术难题,为我国火箭事业作出了突出的贡献,为其他科技工作者树立了榜样。刘竹生的人生实践证明了一个哲理,即()。
设f(x)在[1,+∞)上连续且可导,若曲线y=f(x),直线x=1,x=t(t>1)与x轴围成的平面区域绕x轴旋转一周所得的旋转体的体积为且f(2)=,求函数y=f(x)的表达式.
信息系统开发的结构化方法将信息系统开发的全过程划分为相互独立而又相互依存的阶段,信息系统的逻辑模型形成于
最新回复
(
0
)