首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On May 24, 1976, the British wine merchant Steven Spurrier organized a blind tasting of French and Californian wines. Spurrier w
On May 24, 1976, the British wine merchant Steven Spurrier organized a blind tasting of French and Californian wines. Spurrier w
admin
2011-08-28
44
问题
On May 24, 1976, the British wine merchant Steven Spurrier organized a blind tasting of French and Californian wines. Spurrier was a Francophile and, like most wine experts, didn’t expect the New World upstarts to compete with the premiers crus from Bordeaux. He assembled a panel of eleven wine experts and had them taste a variety of Cabernets blind, rating each bottle on a twenty-point scale.The results shocked the wine world. According to the judges, the best Cabernet at the tasting was a 1973 bottle from Stag’s Leap Wine Cellars in Napa Valley. When the tasting was repeated a few years later—some judges insisted that the French wines had been drunk too young—Stag’s Leap was once again declared the winner, followed by three other California Cabernets. These blind tastings helped to legitimate Napa vineyards.
But now, in an even more surprising turn of events, another American wine region has performed far better than expected in a blind tasting against the finest French chateaus. Ready for the punch line? The wines were from New Jersey.
The tasting was closely modelled on the 1976 event, featuring the same fancy Bordeaux vineyards, such as Chateau Mouton Rothschild and Chateau Haut-Brion. The Jersey entries included bottles from the Heritage Vineyards in Mullica Hill and Unionville Vineyards in Ringoes. The nine judges were French and American wine experts.
The Judgment of Princeton didn’t quite end with a Jersey victory—a French wine was on top in both the red and white categories—but, in terms of the reassurance for those with valuable wine collections, it might as well have. Clos des Mouches only narrowly beat out Unionville Single Vineyard and two other Jersey whites, while Chateau Mouton Rothschild and Haut-Brion topped Heritage’s BDX. The wines from New Jersey cost, on average, about five percent as much as their French counterparts. And then there’s the inconsistency of the judges: the scores for that Mouton Rothschild, for instance, ranged from 11 to 19.5. On the excellent blog Marginal Revolution, the economist Tyler Cowen highlights the analysis of the Princeton professor Richard Quand, who found that almost of all the wines were "statistically undistinguishable" from each other. This suggests that, if the blind tasting were held again, a Jersey wine might very well win.
What can we learn from these tests? First, that tasting wine is really hard, even for experts. Because the sensory differences between different bottles of rotten grape juice are so slight—and the differences get even more muddled after a few sips—there is often wide disagreement about which wines are best. For instance, both the winning red and white wines in the Princeton tasting were ranked by at least one of the judges as the worst.
The perceptual ambiguity of wine helps explain why contextual influences—say, the look of a label, or the price tag on the bottle—can profoundly influence expert judgment. This was nicely demonstrated in a mischievous 2001 experiment led by Frederic Brochet at the University of Bordeaux. In the first test, Brochet invited fifty-seven wine experts and asked them to give their impressions of what looked like two glasses of red and white wine. The wines were actually the same white wine, one of which had been tinted red with food coloring. But that didn’t stop the experts from describing the "red" wine in language typically used to describe red wines. One expert praised its "jamminess," while another enjoyed its "crushed red fruit."
The second test Brochet conducted was even more damning. He took a middling Bordeaux and served it in two different bottles. One bottle bore the label of a fancy grand cru, the other of an ordinary vin de table. Although they were being served the exact same wine, the experts gave the bottles nearly opposite descriptions. The grand cru was summarized as being "agreeable," "woody," "complex," "balanced," and "rounded," while the most popular adjectives for the vin de table included "weak," "short," "light," " flat," and "faulty."
The results are even more distressing for non-experts. In recent decades, the wine world has become an increasingly quantitative place, as dependent on scores and statistics as Billy Beane. But these ratings suggest a false sense of precision, as if it were possible to reliably identify the difference between an eighty-nine-point Merlot from Jersey and a ninety-one-point blend from Bordeaux—or even a greater spread. And so we linger amid the wine racks, paralyzed by the alcoholic arithmetic. How much are we willing to pay for a few extra points?
These calculations are almost certainly a waste of time. Last year, the psychologist Richard Wiseman bought a wide variety of bottles at the local supermarket, from a five-dollar Bordeaux to a fifty-dollar champagne, and asked people to say which wine was more expensive. (All of the taste tests were conducted double-blind, with neither the experimenter nor subject aware of the actual price.) According to Wiseman’s data, the five hundred and seventy-eight participants could only pick the more expensive wine fifty-three percent of the time, which is basically random chance. They actually performed below chance when it came to picking red wines. Bordeaux fared the worst, with a significant majority—sixty-one percent—picking the cheap plonk as the more expensive selection.
From The New Yorker, June 13, 2012
In paragraph 7, what’s the indicative meaning of "perceptual ambiguity"?
选项
A、This ambiguity will last forever and there’s no way to make it definitive.
B、The nuance of different wines while being tasted by experts is very hard to discover.
C、The diversity of wines in theory.
D、None of the above.
答案
B
解析
本题为推断题。要推断的词义出现在文章第七段的第一句,如果不知道perceptual(知觉的)的意思,我们根据上文至少可以推断,这个“模糊性”指的是品酒的感觉方面的,品酒师多喝几口就更难分辨了。因此选项B正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/1eYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
EconomicconditionshaveimprovedduringthepastdecadeinmanyNorthAmericanandEuropeanCBDs,primarilybecauseofanunp
A、thedaybeforeyesterdayB、attwoo’clockyesterdaymorningC、around2:00p.m.yesterdayD、attwentypastfiveyesterdaymorn
Somepeoplebelievethatinternationalsportcreatesgoodwillbetweenthenationsandthatifcountriesplaygamestogetherthey
AdamSmith,theScottishprofessorofmoralphilosophy,wasthrilledbyhisrecognitionoforderintheeconomicsystem.Hisboo
Whyrosesareredandvioletsareblue?Didyoueverwonderwhyyouseethecolorsyoudoorifotheranimalsseethesameco
FashionWiththeprogressionofthehumansociety,peopleareincreasinglydemandingtheirclothestobebeautifulaswellas
A、thestore’stoydepartmentB、foodcourtareaC、theparkinggarageD、electronicappliancesareaB
SpeechacttheorywasoriginatedwiththeBritishphilosopher______inthelate1950s.
ReligioninAmericanLifeDiversityisthechieffeatureofreligionintheUnitedStates.AlthoughChristianityhasalways
ReligioninAmericanLifeDiversityisthechieffeatureofreligionintheUnitedStates.AlthoughChristianityhasalways
随机试题
哪项症状不符合肝经湿热下注的临床表现()(1999年第24题)
(2005年04月)__________就是企业按照人口变量(包括年龄、性别、收入、职业、教育水平、家庭规模、家庭生命周期阶段、宗教、种族、国籍等)来细分消费者市场。
A.咽喉肿痛B.跌打损伤C.骨质增生D.高血压E.癫痫麝香和冰片均能治疗的疾病是
下列各项中,属于影响未分配利润金额的有()。
高老病逝,生有二子高大、高二,领养一子高三,高老的妻子尚在。他留有保险金额24万元的人寿保险一份,其在填写投保单几寸,在受益人一栏填写的是“法定”。同时,高老的哥哥由于从小患有精神病,一直跟随高老生活,现在健在。根据上而资料,问答下列问题:下
能力的结构大体上分为三种理论模型,其中不包括()。
我国现行的《中小学教师职业道德规范》颁布于()
人工智能是指由人工制造出来的系统所表现出来的智能。人工智能的核心问题包括推理、知识、规划、学习、交流、感知、移动和操作物体的能力等。下列论述中所描述的各项技术突破,无关人工智能的是()。
以下行为属于意思表示的是()。
Readthefollowingtextanddecidewhichanswerbestfitseachspace.Forquestions26~45,markoneletterA,B,CorDony
最新回复
(
0
)