首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animal. T
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animal. T
admin
2023-01-17
53
问题
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animal. The practice, they argue, threatens human health by turning farms into breeding grounds of drug-resistant bacteria. Farmers responded that restricting antibiotics in livestock would devastate the industry and significantly raise costs to consumers. We have empirical data that should resolve this debate. Since 1995, Denmark has enforced progressively tighter rules on the use of antibiotics in raising pigs, poultry and other livestock. In the process, it has shown that it’s possible to protect human health without hurting farmers.
Farmers in many countries use antibiotics in two key ways: (1) at full strength to treat sick animals and (2) in low doses to fatten meat-producing livestock or to prevent veterinary illnesses. Although even the proper use of antibiotics can inadvertently lead to the spread of drug-resistant bacteria, the habit of using a low or "sub-therapeutic" dose is a formula for disaster: the treatment provides just enough antibiotic to kill some but not all bacteria. The germs that survive are typically those that happen to bear genetic mutations for resisting the antibiotic. They then reproduce and exchange genes with other microbial resisters. Because bacteria are found literally everywhere, resistant strains produced in animals eventually find their way into people as well. You could hardly design a better system for guaranteeing the spread of antibiotic resistance.
The data from multiple studies over the years support the conclusion that low doses of antibiotics in animals increase the number of drug-resistant microbes in both animals and people. As Joshua M. Scharfstein, a principal deputy commissioner at the Food and Drug Administration, put it, "You actually can trace the specific bacteria around and… find that the resistant strains in humans match the resistant strains in the animals." And this science is what led Denmark to stop sub-therapeutic dosing of chickens, pigs and other farm animals. Although the transition unfolded smoothly in the poultry industry, the average weight of pigs fell in the first year. But after Danish farmers started leaving piglets together with their mothers a few weeks longer to bolster their immune systems naturally, the animals’ weights jumped back up, and the number of pigs per litter increased as well. The lesson is that improving animal husbandry—making sure that stalls and cages are properly cleaned and giving animals more room or time to mature—
offsets
the initial negative impact of limiting antibiotic use. Today Danish industry reports that productivity is higher than before. Meanwhile, reports of antibiotic resistance in Danish people are mixed, which shows—as if we needed reminding—that there are no quick fixes.
Of course, the way veterinary antibiotics are used is not the only cause of human drug-resistant infections. Careless use of the drugs in people also contributes to the problem. But agricultural use is still a major contributing factor. Every day brings new evidence that we are in danger of losing effective antibiotic protection against many of the most dangerous bacteria that cause human illness. The technical issues are solvable. Denmark’s example proves that it is possible to cut antibiotic use on farms without triggering financial disaster. In fact, it might provide a competitive advantage. Stronger measures to deprive drug-resistant bacteria of their agricultural breeding grounds simply make scientific, economic and common sense.
What does the word "offset" underlined in Paragraph 4 mean?
选项
A、To serve as a beginning of.
B、To render ineffectively.
C、To set a limit on.
D、To compensate for.
答案
D
解析
offset意为“抵消,补偿”,故D项compel sate“补偿”为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/1jcD777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Scientistssentpatternsofelectricitycoursingacrosspeople’sbrains,coaxingtheirbrainstoseelettersthatweren’tthere.
A.HelptodetectasuspectB.DiscoverthepotentialhealthproblemsearlierC.RevealtheunknownsofthefamilyD
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
随机试题
Ifyoutravelinaforeigncountry,atour______maysaveyoualotoftrouble.
急性肾衰竭少尿期一般持续天数
A、生物碱B、黄酮C、挥发油D、二蒽酮苷E、靛玉红黄芩药材主要化学成分含
29岁妇女,因腹痛伴肛门坠胀10小时入院。末次月经9月3日,9月10日开始腹痛,以下腹部为主,呈持续性加重。体温38℃,脉搏110次/分,阴道内少量血性分泌物,宫颈中度糜烂,举痛明显,子宫前位,大小正常,活动欠佳,后穹窿饱满。此诊断首先考虑为()
根据《中华人民共和国民法通则》,法人应具备的条件包括()。
商业银行财务报告中的财务状况变动表是反映商业银行()。
甲公司和乙公司均为增值税一般纳税企业,增值税税率17%。2003年1月18日甲公司和乙公司经研究决定进行资产置换。2003年3月1日甲公司收到乙公司的补价18万元,2003年4月1日甲公司和乙公司办理完毕资产所有权划转手续。甲公司以其产品换入乙公司的机器设
决定的正文部分由制发决定的根据、执行要求和结尾三大部分组成。()
法院的领导在工作例会上公布了一个工作方案。你认为实施成本和费用都很高。你怎么办?
Therearestillmanyproblemsaheadofus,butbythistimenextyearwecanseelightattheendofthe______.
最新回复
(
0
)