首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animal. T
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animal. T
admin
2023-01-17
28
问题
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animal. The practice, they argue, threatens human health by turning farms into breeding grounds of drug-resistant bacteria. Farmers responded that restricting antibiotics in livestock would devastate the industry and significantly raise costs to consumers. We have empirical data that should resolve this debate. Since 1995, Denmark has enforced progressively tighter rules on the use of antibiotics in raising pigs, poultry and other livestock. In the process, it has shown that it’s possible to protect human health without hurting farmers.
Farmers in many countries use antibiotics in two key ways: (1) at full strength to treat sick animals and (2) in low doses to fatten meat-producing livestock or to prevent veterinary illnesses. Although even the proper use of antibiotics can inadvertently lead to the spread of drug-resistant bacteria, the habit of using a low or "sub-therapeutic" dose is a formula for disaster: the treatment provides just enough antibiotic to kill some but not all bacteria. The germs that survive are typically those that happen to bear genetic mutations for resisting the antibiotic. They then reproduce and exchange genes with other microbial resisters. Because bacteria are found literally everywhere, resistant strains produced in animals eventually find their way into people as well. You could hardly design a better system for guaranteeing the spread of antibiotic resistance.
The data from multiple studies over the years support the conclusion that low doses of antibiotics in animals increase the number of drug-resistant microbes in both animals and people. As Joshua M. Scharfstein, a principal deputy commissioner at the Food and Drug Administration, put it, "You actually can trace the specific bacteria around and… find that the resistant strains in humans match the resistant strains in the animals." And this science is what led Denmark to stop sub-therapeutic dosing of chickens, pigs and other farm animals. Although the transition unfolded smoothly in the poultry industry, the average weight of pigs fell in the first year. But after Danish farmers started leaving piglets together with their mothers a few weeks longer to bolster their immune systems naturally, the animals’ weights jumped back up, and the number of pigs per litter increased as well. The lesson is that improving animal husbandry—making sure that stalls and cages are properly cleaned and giving animals more room or time to mature—
offsets
the initial negative impact of limiting antibiotic use. Today Danish industry reports that productivity is higher than before. Meanwhile, reports of antibiotic resistance in Danish people are mixed, which shows—as if we needed reminding—that there are no quick fixes.
Of course, the way veterinary antibiotics are used is not the only cause of human drug-resistant infections. Careless use of the drugs in people also contributes to the problem. But agricultural use is still a major contributing factor. Every day brings new evidence that we are in danger of losing effective antibiotic protection against many of the most dangerous bacteria that cause human illness. The technical issues are solvable. Denmark’s example proves that it is possible to cut antibiotic use on farms without triggering financial disaster. In fact, it might provide a competitive advantage. Stronger measures to deprive drug-resistant bacteria of their agricultural breeding grounds simply make scientific, economic and common sense.
What does the word "offset" underlined in Paragraph 4 mean?
选项
A、To serve as a beginning of.
B、To render ineffectively.
C、To set a limit on.
D、To compensate for.
答案
D
解析
offset意为“抵消,补偿”,故D项compel sate“补偿”为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/1jcD777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Americahaslongbeenresistanttoadequatepovertypoliciesbecauseofitsstrongstrainofthinkingthatthepoorareresponsi
Americahaslongbeenresistanttoadequatepovertypoliciesbecauseofitsstrongstrainofthinkingthatthepoorareresponsi
Scientistssentpatternsofelectricitycoursingacrosspeople’sbrains,coaxingtheirbrainstoseelettersthatweren’tthere.
Scientistssentpatternsofelectricitycoursingacrosspeople’sbrains,coaxingtheirbrainstoseelettersthatweren’tthere.
A.HelptodetectasuspectB.DiscoverthepotentialhealthproblemsearlierC.RevealtheunknownsofthefamilyD
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
随机试题
男性,54岁,间歇性跛行3年,症状加重伴右侧小腿肌肉静息痛1年,右足皮肤苍白、足背动脉搏动减弱,既往有高血压和高脂血症史多年。术前检查中对于把握手术适应证以及选择手术方法有重要意义的项目是
有关全国人大常委会的职权,下列哪个选项正确?
某县环保局经该县建设规划局许可批准,在一居民小区最北侧居民楼北边盖了一幢7层的办公楼,由于与居民楼距离过近,未达到建筑设计规范要求的楼间距,致使三楼以下的部分居民在冬至日未达到最低的采光标准而构成遮挡。部分居民将建设规划局诉至法院行政庭,经审查,法院认为建
某幼儿园教学楼为3层混合结构,基础采用M5水泥砂浆砌筑,主体结构用M5水泥石灰混合砂浆砌筑;2层有一外阳台,采用悬挑梁加端头梁结构。悬挑梁外挑长度为2.4m,阳台栏板高度为1.1m。为了增加幼儿的活动空间,幼儿园在阳台增铺花岗石地面,厚度为100mm,将阳
设置内支撑的基坑维护结构,挡土的应力传递路径是()。
根据《住宅室内装饰装修管理办法》的规定,装修人从事住宅室内装饰装修活动时,经过批准后,才能行使的施工行为包括()。
下列建筑中,可不设置环形消防车道的是()。
建筑剖面设计不包括()。
(浙江2010—73)6,7,18,23,38,()
一位长期从事醉酒及酒精中毒研究的医生发现,一般情况下,醉酒者的暴力倾向远远高于未饮酒者或适度饮酒者。据此,该医生断定,具有暴力倾向的人容易喝醉酒。以下哪项最严重地削弱了这位医生的断定?
最新回复
(
0
)