首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Between the invention of agriculture and the commercial revolution that marked the end of the middle ages, wealth and technology
Between the invention of agriculture and the commercial revolution that marked the end of the middle ages, wealth and technology
admin
2013-01-30
57
问题
Between the invention of agriculture and the commercial revolution that marked the end of the middle ages, wealth and technology developed slowly indeed. Medieval historians tell of the centuries it took for key inventions like the watermill or the heavy plow to diffuse across the landscape. During this period, increases in technology led to increases in the population, with little if any appearing as an improvement in the median standard of living.
Even the first century of the industrial revolution produced more " improvements" than "revolutions" in standards of living. With the railroad and the spinning and weaving of textiles as important exceptions, most innovations of that period were innovations in how goods were produced and transported and in new kinds of capital, but not in consumer goods. Standards of living improved, but styles of life remained much the same.
The eighteenth and nineteenth centuries saw a faster and different kind of change. For the first time, technological capability outran population growth and natural resource scarcity. By the last quarter of the nineteenth century, the typical inhabitant of the leading economies—a Briton, a Belgian, an American, or an Australian had perhaps three times the standard of living of some-one in a pre-industrial economy.
Still, so slow was the pace of change that people, or at least aristocratic intellectuals, could think of their predecessors of some two thousand years before as effectively their contemporaries. Marcus Tullius Cicero, a Roman aristocrat and politician, might have felt more or less at home in the company of Thomas Jefferson. The plows were better in Jefferson’ s time. Sailing ships were much improved. However, these might have been insufficient to create a sense of a qualitative change in the order of life for the elite. Moreover, being a slave of Jefferson was probably a lot like being a slave of Cicero.
So slow was the pace of change that intellectuals in the early nineteenth century debated whether the industrial revolution was worthwhile, whether it was an improvement or a degeneration in the standard of living. Opinions were genuinely divided, with as optimistic a liberal as John Stuart Mill coming down on the "pessimist" side as late as the end of the 1840s.
In the twentieth century, however, standards of living exploded. In the twentieth century, the magnitude of the growth in material wealth has been so great as to make it nearly impossible to measure. Consider a sample of consumer goods available through Montgomery Ward in 1895— when a one-speed bicycle cost $ 65. Since then, the price of a bicycle measured in "nominal" dollars has more than doubled (as a result of inflation) . Today, the bicycle is much less expensive in terms of the measure that truly counts, its "real" price: the work and sweat needed to earn its cost. In 1895, it took perhaps 260 hours worth of the average American worker’ s production to amass enough money to buy a one-speed bicycle. Today an average American worker can buy one—and of higher quality—for less than 8 hours worth of production.
On the bicycle standard (measuring wealth by counting up how many bicycles the labor can buy) the average American worker today is 36 times richer than his or her counterpart was in 1895. Other commodities would tell a different story. An office chair has become 12. 5 times cheaper in terms of the time it takes the average worker to produce enough to pay for it. A Steinway piano or an accordion is only twice as cheap. A silver teaspoon is 25 percent more expensive.
Thus the answer to the question "How much wealthier are we today than our counterparts of a century ago? " depends on which commodities you view as important. For many personal services—having a butler to answer the door and polish your silver spoons—you would find little difference in average wealth between 1895 and 1990: an hour of a butler’ s time costs about the same then as now. For mass-produced manufactured goods—like bicycles—we are wealthier by as much as 36 times.
A suitable title for this passage might be_____.
选项
A、The Tempo and Temper of Change
B、The Steadily Increasing Rate of Change
C、An Explosion of Material Wealth
D、Improving the Standards of Living for All
答案
A
解析
根据全文内容,讲解的是从中世纪一直到20世纪的变化,由此得出,答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/1mhi777K
0
在职申硕(同等学力)英语
相关试题推荐
What’syourearliestchildhoodmemory?Canyourememberlearningtowalk?Ortalk?Thefirsttimeyou【C1】______thunderorwatche
Formillionsofyearsbeforetheappearanceoftheelectriclight,shiftwork,all-nightcableTVandtheInternet,theEarth’s
Ourbodiesarewonderfullyskillfulatmaintainingbalance.Whenthetemperaturejumps,wesweattocooldown.Whenourbloodpr
IntheUSA,85%ofthepopulationovertheageof21approveofthedeathpenalty.Inthemanystateswhichstillhavethedeath
TheNetherlandsplanstostartbuildingfloatingcommunitiesonwaterbecause______Byciting"Everyoneaskswhydidn’twedo
Andreaallowedthehitchhikertotakearideinhercar,mainlybecause______Andreascreamedbecause
Recentstudieshaveposedthequestionastowhetherthereisalinkbetweenfilmviolenceandrealviolence.
Michael,anAmericanprofessionalbasketballplayer,isconsideredbymanytobethegreatestplayerinbasketballhistory.The
Michael,anAmericanprofessionalbasketballplayer,isconsideredbymanytobethegreatestplayerinbasketballhistory.The
Michael,anAmericanprofessionalbasketballplayer,isconsideredbymanytobethegreatestplayerinbasketballhistory.The
随机试题
劳动安全卫生的立法最早产生于()
A.归脾汤B.炙甘草汤C.生脉散D.知柏地黄丸E.天王补心丹热病后期损及心阴而致心悸者,其治疗应选的方剂为
A.VB.C88C.D.ClE.AUC表观分布容积为()。
北方某内陆城市建设一地下水集中开采供水水源地。根据《环境影响评价技术导则一地下水环境》,该建设项目对地下水环境的主要影响可能有()。
当发生()情况之一时,发包方可以没收投标人的投标保证金。
WhichofthefollowingstatementsabouttheGrammarTranslationMethodisincorrect?
与1996年相比,2001年高技术产业中“三资企业”的从业人员数量增长了()。2001年我国“三资”高技术企业中电子及通信设备制造业从业人员人均营业收入为()元。
我国《刑法》第307条第1款规定:“以暴力、威胁、贿买等方法阻止证人作证或者指使他人作伪证……情节严重的,处三年以上七年以下有期徒刑。”某人民法院经审理查明,甲通过贿买等方式阻止目击者作证,情节严重,依法判处甲有期徒刑七年。法院在该案中运用的逻辑推理方式是
【B1】【B5】
Therearesomanynewbooksaboutdyingthattherearenowspecialshelvessetasidefortheminbookshops,alongwiththehealt
最新回复
(
0
)