2. 外语
  3. With the constructor of the railways in the 19th century, a new sociological phenomenon was born: the traveling criminal. Until

With the constructor of the railways in the 19th century, a new sociological phenomenon was born: the traveling criminal. Until

admin2012-03-23  23
问题     With the constructor of the railways in the 19th century, a new sociological phenomenon was born: the traveling criminal. Until then, police had relied on local communities to recognize a bad apple in their midst, but now the felons were on the move, wreaking havoc in communities which had no knowledge of their past and hence no reason to be wary. For law enforcers trying to contain the problem by sharing descriptions of known recidivists, it became imperative to answer one question, what is it that identifies someone as a particular person?
    This question has long troubled humanity, of course, and it is explored in all its facets in a new exhibition at the Welcome Collection in London. One practical application lies in the forensic arena. The first solution offered, branding, was simple and effective. But even in a society that preferred to believe that criminals were born and not made, this was soon deemed unacceptable. So there was a need to find something innate to human beings that remains constant from the cradle to the grave, and that is sufficiently differentiated in the population to make it useful in identifying individuals.
    Alphonse Brillion, who appears in one of the identity cards he invented, came up with a system that combined photography (the profile and face-on photos that police still use today) with a range of bodily measurements. His system was widely taken up until Sir Francis Galeton, a colleague, rival and inveterate classifier, realized the individualizing potential of fingerprints. These held sway for a century until, in 1984, Sir Alec Jeffrey’s of Leicester University stumbled on an even more powerful personal barcode: DNA.
    Embedded in this short history is all the elusiveness of human identity; each new advance reveals the flaws in earlier systems. Go to the website of the New York-based Innocence Project to see the latest tally of exonerations that have taken place in America, after DNA evidence showed those convictions to be unsafe. At the time of writing, the figure comes to 246. Mistaken eyewitness identification is a major culprit, but fingerprint misidentification is cited too.
    Ironically, our facility for recognizing faces may be to blame. The brain has evolved to look for patterns, and when one is incomplete it will fill in the gaps, sometimes leaping to the wrong conclusion, as Brandon Mayfield, an Oregon lawyer, discovered when he was wrongly implicated in the 2004 Madrid bombings on the basis of a single, poor-quality fingerprint.
    So what of DNA? Within hours of reaching a crime scene, police may now have information that helps identify suspects. In the courtroom, DNA trumps all other identifiers. But it has its limitations. With ever more minute quantities becoming detectable, contamination is a serious issue. The Phantom of Heilbronn murdered her way across Europe until, last March, she was discovered not to exist. The DNA found at each crime scene actually came from a female worker in the factory that manufactured the cotton swabs used to collect evidence.
    There is another problem with DNA. When the technology allows for a person’s entire genome to be read from a single drop of blood, it may well constitute a gold standard for identification. But for now analysts work with a snapshot of that genome, represented by an arbitrary number of markers spaced along it. If there are gaps to be filled, the brain will fill them, which could make it vulnerable to the same kind of errors as its predecessors.
    From the very real traveling criminal, via the Phantom of Heilbronn, the Welcome exhibition returns to the central question. Perhaps identity, like beauty, lies in the eye of the beholder, and if people want to see one and not the other, they need to invent a new way of looking.  
Which of the following can be the best title for the passage?
选项 A、Human Identity—an Elusive Illusion
B、How to Identify a Particular Person
C、What Makes Human Beings Individuals?
D、The History of Human Identity
答案A
解析 主旨题。从全文来看，原文主要侧重讲述人类身份认证的历史过程，通过这一过程，人们发现现存的身份认证系统都有缺陷，新的系统有待开发。所以通过阅读本篇文章，可以得出人类身份非常难以认证这一论断。[A]“身份认证——一个迷离的幻影”不但指出了人类身份认证这一话题，并且给予了适当的评价，故为正确答案。[B]“怎样识别一个特定的人”，而原文不仅仅讲了识别人类身份的方法，也指出了现存方法的缺陷，比较片面，因此排除。[C]“人类个体之间的差异是什么?”这一问题虽贯穿文章始终，但是文章并没有解决，只是讲述人们一直试图回答这一问题和现存的困难，排除。[D]“人类身份认证发展史”没有包含人类身份认证的艰辛，因此不全面，排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/1niO777K
0

专业英语八级

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)