2. 外语
  3. The world as we know it, some believe, needs fossil fuel to grow. "Global demand for energy is rising, driven by growing populat

The world as we know it, some believe, needs fossil fuel to grow. "Global demand for energy is rising, driven by growing populat

admin2023-01-30  6
问题     The world as we know it, some believe, needs fossil fuel to grow. "Global demand for energy is rising, driven by growing population with rising living standards," reads the Shell website. A recently-deleted British Petroleum ad said, "The world needs progress, seeking new possibilities everywhere so we can keep powering dreams and ambitions. " In other words, the key to people of the world living long, more prosperous lives is access to energy.
    However, a study in the journal Environmental Research Letters came to a starkly different conclusion. After examining the relationship between the life expectancy and fossil fuel use across 70 countries from the year 1971 to 2014, the researchers found that the increase in energy consumption was not the primary reason countries saw the increased life expectancy. Although energy and energy consumption were correlated with the life expectancy—an increase of 14 years over the 43-year period—the increase in energy use only accounted for roughly one-quarter of that increase; roughly four of those 14 years.
    "The easiest way to explain this is a thought experiment: given the relationships we measure from our data, can we measure how much the life expectancy would have increased if only fossil fuel emissions had increased? And can we measure how much the life expectancy would have increased without any increase in fossil fuel emissions? The total of these two add up to the total change in the life expectancy," said lead author of the study Julia Steinberger, via email.
    However, the researchers found that increased energy consumption was associated with a 90% increase in GDP—the economic meter usually used as a basis for assessing a country’s well-being, and ultimately the well-being of its residents. Academics have debated whether increasing GDP is possible while also reducing carbon emissions for a long time.
    For their part, the authors argue that GDP is an intrinsically flawed meter for residents’ well-being because, just because it does assess the economic standing of a nation, doesn’t mean it speaks to how that wealth is (or isn’t) distributed, let alone how long and well residents will live. If policymakers mean what they say when they claim to care about improving people’s lives while lowering greenhouse gas emissions, these findings are good for everybody.

Why do authors argue that GDP is an intrinsically flawed meter for residents’ well-being?
选项 A、It can’t assess a nation’s economic status.
B、It doesn’t help distribute the wealth.
C、It is unable to assess the longevity and health of residents.
D、It doesn’t help improve people’s lives.
答案C
解析 由题干中的an intrinsically flawed meter定位到最后一段首句。推理判断题。根据定位句可知，作者们认为GDP是一个本质上有缺陷的居民幸福的衡量标准，原因在于，仅仅因为它确实评估了一个国家的经济地位，并不意味着它说明了财富是(或不是)如何分配的，更不用说居民的寿命和健康状况了。由此可知。GDP并不能完全说明国民的寿命和生活质量，故答案为C)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/1oqD777K
0

大学英语四级

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)