首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
admin
2013-11-29
28
问题
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish population is in shrinking. The study, the National Jewish Population Survey, found 5.2 million Jews living in the United States in 2000, a drop of 5 percent, or 300,000 people, since a similar study in 1990.What’s truly startling is that the reported decline is not true. Worse still, the sponsor of the $6 million study, United Jewish Communities, knows it.
Both it and the authors have openly admitted their doubts. They have acknowledged in interviews that the population totals for 2000 and 1990 were reached by different methods and are not directly comparable. The survey itself also cautions readers, in a dauntingly technical appendix, that judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount. When the research director and project director were asked whether the data should be construed to indicate a declining Jewish population, they flatly answered no. In addition, other survey researchers interviewed pointed to other studies with population estimates as high as 6.7 million.
Despite all this, the two figures—5.2 million now, 5.5 million then—are listed by side in the survey, leaving the impression that the population has shrunk. The result, predictably, has been a rash of headlines trumpeting the illusionary decline, in turn touching off jeremiads by rabbis and. moralists condemning the religious laxity behind it. Whether out of ideology, ego, incompetence or a combination of all three, the respected charity has invented a crisis.
United Jewish Communities is the coordinating body for a national network of Jewish philanthropies with combined budgets of $2 billion. Its population surveys carry huge weight in shaping community policy. This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm. The last one, conducted by a predecessor organization, found that 52 percent of American Jews who married between 1985 and 1990 did so outside the faith. That number was a fabrication produced by including marriages in which neither party was Jewish by anyone’s definition, including the researchers.
Its publication created a huge stir, inspiring anguished sermons, books and conferences. It put liberals on the defensive, emboldened conservatives who reject full integration into society and alienated ordinary folks by the increasingly xenophobic tone of Jewish communal culture. The new survey, to its credit, retracts that figure and offers the latest survey has spawned a panic created by the last one.
So why did the organization flawed figures once again? Some scholars who have studied the survey believe the motivation then came partly out of a desire to shock straying Jews into greater observance. It’s too early to tell if that’s the case this time around. What is clear is the researchers did their job with little regard to how their data could be misconstrued. They used statistical models and question formats that, while internally sound, made the new survey incompatible with the previous one. For example, this time the researchers divided the population of 5.2 million into two groups—"highly involved" Jews and "people of Jewish background" — and posed most questions only to the first group. As a result, most findings about belief and observance refer only to a subgroup of American Jews, making comparisons to the past impossible.
We can’t afford to wait a decade before these figures are revised. The false population decline must be corrected before it further sours communal discourse. The United Jewish Communities owes it to itself and its public to step forward and state plainly what it knows to be true: American Jews are not disappearing.
According to the passage, which of the following statements is NOT true about the National Jewish Population Survey?
选项
A、It found a decline of 300,000 Jews in ten years.
B、It was carried out by United Jewish Communities.
C、This is the first time United Jewish Communities has made mistakes in the population survey.
D、The reported decline is not reliable.
答案
C
解析
作者在第四段介绍了" United Jewish Communities这一组织,并说到This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm.
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/1yZO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
ThebiggestproblemfacingChileasitpromotesitselfasatouristdestinationisthatitisattheendoftheearth.Itisto
AccordingtoOxfordEnglishDictionary,bookis"awrittenorprintedtreatiseorseriesoftreatises,occupyingseveralsheets
Australiahasbeenacontinentwithfewpeoplemainlybecauseof
Thepublicationof______markedthebreakwithclassicismandthebeginningoftheRomanticrevivalinEngland.
______istheestablishedchurchinScotland.
CollegesintheUnitedStatesdependonthreesourcesofincomeEXCEPT
Bynow,itshouldcomeasnosurprisewhenscientistsdiscoveryetanothercaseofexperiencechangingthebrain.Fromthesenso
ThefirstrealorganizedefforttounitingEuropecame(1)______withthecreationoftheCouncilofEurope,wasestablished(2)
Humour(alsospelledhumor)istheabilityorqualityofpeople,objects,orsituationstoevokefeelingsofamusementinother
随机试题
学校对学生进行德育的最基本、最经常的途径是()
自发性气胸的保守治疗适应症为
建设项目验收委员会或验收组的主要职责和任务是()。
货源标记是用来表示()的标志。
中华人民共和国全国人民代表大会公告(第二号)第十届全国人民代表大会第一次会议于2003年3月15日选举:胡锦涛为中华人民共和国主席;曾庆红为中华人民共和国副主席。现予公告。
10月6日晚上,张强要么去电影院看了电影,要么拜访了他的朋友秦玲。如果那天晚上张强开车回家,他就没去电影院看电影。只有张强事先与秦玲约定,张强才能去拜访她,事实上,张强不可能事先与秦玲约定。根据以上陈述,可以得出以下哪项?()
提供原型生命周期的目的是提交一个有内容的【】。
窗体上有一个由两个文本框组成的控件数组,名称为Text1,并有如下事件过程:PrivateSubText1_Change(IndexAsInteger)SelectCaseIndexCase0Textl
中国民族自古以来从不把人看作高于一切,在哲学文艺方面的表现都反映出人在自然界中与万物占着一个比例较为恰当的地位,而非绝对统治万物的主宰。(2006年真题)
Intherealworldmostpeoplehaveadefinitedislike【C1】______certainsortsofworkathome.Twoofthesetasksareironingclo
最新回复
(
0
)