首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. A)A simple idea underli
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. A)A simple idea underli
admin
2016-04-26
45
问题
How science goes wrong
Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself.
A)A simple idea underlies science: "trust, but verify". Results should always be subject to challenge from experiment. That simple but powerful idea has generated a vast body of knowledge. Since its birth in the 17th century, modern science has changed the world beyond recognition, and overwhelmingly for the better. But success can breed extreme self-satisfaction. Modern scientists are doing too much trusting and not enough verifying, damaging the whole of science, and of humanity. B)Too many of the findings are the result of cheap experiments or poor analysis. A rule of thumb among biotechnology venture-capitalists is that half of published research cannot be replicated(复制). Even that may be optimistic. Last year researchers at one biotech firm, Amgen, found they could reproduce just six of 53 "milestone" studies in cancer research. Earlier, a group at Bayer, a drug company, managed to repeat just a quarter of 67 similarly important papers. A leading computer scientist worries that three-quarters of papers in his subfield are nonsense. In 2000-10, roughly 80,000 patients took part in clinical trials based on research that was later withdrawn because of mistakes or improperness.
What a load of rubbish
C)Even when flawed research does not put people’s lives at risk—and much of it is too far from the market to do so—it blows money and the efforts of some of the world’s best minds. The opportunity costs of hindered progress are hard to quantify, but they are likely to be vast. And they could be rising.
D)One reason is the competitiveness of science. In the 1950s, when modern academic research took shape after its successes in the Second World War, it was still a rarefied(小众的)pastime. The entire club of scientists numbered a few hundred thousand. As their ranks have swelled to 6m -7m active researchers on the latest account, scientists have lost their taste for self-policing and quality control. The obligation to "publish or perish(消亡)" has come to rule over academic life. Competition for jobs is cut-throat. Full professors in America earned on average $135,000 in 2012—more than judges did. Every year six freshly minted PhDs strive for every academic post. Nowadays verification(the replication of other people’s results)does little to advance a researcher’s career. And without verification, uncertain findings live on to mislead.
E)Careerism also encourages exaggeration and the choose-the-most-profitable of results. In order to safeguard their exclusivity, the leading journals impose high rejection rates: in excess of 90% of submitted manuscripts. The most striking findings have the greatest chance of making it onto the page. Little wonder that one in three researchers knows of a colleague who has polished a paper by, say, excluding inconvenient data from results based on his instinct, And as more research teams around the world work on a problem, it is more likely that at least one will fall prey to an honest confusion between the sweet signal of a genuine discovery and a nut of the statistical noise. Such lake correlations are often recorded in journals eager for startling papers. If they touch on drinking wine, or letting children play video games, they may well command the front pages of newspapers, too.
F)Conversely, failures to prove a hypothesis(假设)are rarely even offered for publication, let alone accepted. "Negative results" now account for only 14% of published papers, down from 30% in 1990. Yet knowing what is false is as important to science as knowing what is true. The failure to report failures means that researchers waste money and effort exploring blind alleys already investigated by other scientists.
G)The holy process of peer review is not all it is praised to be, either. When a prominent medical journal ran research past other experts in the field, it found that most of the reviewers failed to spot mistakes it had deliberately inserted into papers, even after being told they were being tested.
If it’s broke, fix it
H)All this makes a shaky foundation for an enterprise dedicated to discovering the truth about the world. What might be done to shore it up? One priority should be for all disciplines to follow the example of those that have done most to tighten standards. A start would be getting to grips with statistics, especially in the growing number of fields that screen through untold crowds of data looking for patterns. Geneticists have done this, and turned an early stream of deceptive results from genome sequencing(基因组测序)into a flow of truly significant ones.
I)Ideally, research protocols(草案)should be registered in advance and monitored in virtual notebooks. This would curb the temptation to manipulate the experiment’s design midstream so as to make the results look more substantial than they are.(It is already meant to happen in clinical trials of drugs.)
Where possible, trial data also should be open for other researchers to inspect and test.
J)The most enlightened journals are already showing less dislike of tedious papers. Some government funding agencies, including America’s National Institutes of Health, which give out $30 billion on research each year, are working out how best to encourage replication. And growing numbers of scientists, especially young ones, understand statistics. But these trends need to go much further. Journals should allocate space for "uninteresting" work, and grant-givers should set- aside money to pay for it. Peer review should be tightened—or perhaps dispensed with altogether, in favour of post-publication evaluation in the form of appended comments. That system has worked well in recent years in physics and mathematics. Lastly, policymakers should ensure that institutions using public money also respect the rules.
K)Science still commands enormous—if sometimes perplexed—respect. But its privileged status is founded on the capacity to be right most of the time and to correct its mistakes when it gets things wrong. And it is not as if the universe is short of genuine mysteries to keep generations of scientists hard at work. The false trails laid down by cheap research are an unforgivable barrier to understanding.
Some government funding agencies have already granted money to figure out how best to encourage replication.
选项
答案
J
解析
本题涉及对于目前学术问题的整治办法,可知答案应在If it’s broke,fix it标题下的内容查找。由government funding agencies和encourage replication可以定位到J段第2句。原文提到一些政府机构正着手研究如何鼓励复现已有的科研成果,题中的grant money对应原文的give out $30 billion,而figure out则对应work out,故可确定答案为J段。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/20e7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
GettingThin—forGoodA)Justabouteveryonehasbeenonadietatonetimeoranother,andmillionsofushavelearnedthatthe
ProtestsattheuseofanimalsinresearchhavetakenanewandfearfulcharacterinBritainwithattemptedmurderoftwoBritis
WhenMomandDadGrowOldA)Theprospectoftalkingtoincreasinglyfragileparentsabouttheirfuturecanbe"oneofthemostd
TheArtofFriendshipA)OneeveningafewyearsagoIfoundmyselfinananxiety.Nothingwasreallywrong—myfamilyandIwere
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreallygoodscience,itisimpossibletopredict.Iftheth
Ithasbeensaidthateveryonelivesbysellingsomething.Inthelightofthisstatement,teacherslivebyselling【C1】______,p
A、AnemployeeinthecitycouncilatBirmingham.B、AssistantDirectoroftheAdmissionsOffice.C、HeadoftheOverseasStudents
Moreandmoreoftheworld’spopulationarelivingintownsorcities.Thespeedatwhichcitiesaregrowinginthelessdevelop
A、HerefusedtotakeLindawiththem.B、HeagreedtotakeLindawiththem.C、HethoughtLindashoulddecideherself.D、Hethough
没有哪个国家比中国对汽车更痴狂了,这里新成为中产阶层的人们的梦想就是拥有一辆闪闪发光的(shiny)新汽车。但仅仅有汽车对这些渴望超越中产阶层的人们是不够的,牌照号就成为与汽车一样能够象征身份和地位的东西。车牌号(licenseplates)的发放通常是
随机试题
国家对药品价格实行的是
营业税的纳税人是在我国境内有偿提供应税劳务、转让无形资产、销售不动产的单位和个人,包括()。
经营风险引起的是潜在损失,而交易风险和折算风险分别引起实际损失和账面损失。()
按照《保险法》的规定,下列说法中,不正确的是()。
利率是国家管理经济的重要工具,当经济衰退加剧、价格下降过快时,中央银行一般采取的调控方法是()。
甲股份有限公司为上市公司,2012年1月1日递延所得税资产为396万元,递延所得税负债为990万元,适用的所得税税率为25%。根据2012年颁布的新税法规定,自2013年1月1日起,该公司适用的所得税税率变更为15%。该公司2012年利润总额为6100万元
预防未成年人犯罪,在各级人民政府组织领导下,实行()。
在现实生活中,由于人们的立场和观点不同,对人活着的意义理解不同,存在着各种不同的人生观,人生观是:
西周法官在审判中判断当事人陈述真伪的方式叫做( )。
厂长:采用新的工艺流程可以大大减少炼铜车间所产生的二氧化碳。这一新流程的要点是用封闭式熔炉替代原来的开放式熔炉,同时,在固态下而不是在液态下按照流程把铜从一个熔炉转人下一个熔炉。但是,不仅购置和改造新的设备是笔大的开支,而且运作新流程的成本也高于目前的流程
最新回复
(
0
)