首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2012-12-30
48
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas (push the fat guy off the bridge) and personalities that were psychopathic. Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve— inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
What function does the first sentence in the second paragraph serve?
选项
A、It further explains the theory of utilitarianism.
B、It forms a contrast to general cases of utilitarianism.
C、It acts as the connecting link to bring up the theme.
D、It gives an example to explain utilitarianism in particular cases.
答案
C
解析
篇章结构题。本文开篇介绍了功利主义这一概念,第二段首句提出“It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases.”这一个人观点,之后用恐怖主义嫌疑分子受刑为例说明功利主义可能出现的问题,由此引出Daniel Bartels和David Pizarro的实验,从第三段开始就是对两人实验过程的具体说明,可见,第二段首句为一过渡句,承上启下,由此引出全文主旨,故[C]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/23aO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheEffectivenessofaPerson1.believethereisnosuchthingas(1),【1】______sothesolutionis(2)whenitisoptimumor
In17th-centuryNewEngland,almosteveryonebelievedinwitches.Strugglingtosurviveinavastandsometimesunforgivingland
A、whereonewillbewhilestudyingB、one’sexaminationresultsC、additionalallowanceoneisabletogetD、whetheroneliveswit
What’stherelationshipbetween"John’suncleboughtanewcaryesterday"and"Johnhasanuncle"?
Meteorologistsroutinelytelluswhatnextweek’sweatherislikelytohe,andclimatescientistsdiscusswhatmighthappenin1
InthefirstyearorsoofWebbusiness,mostoftheactionhasrevolvedaroundeffortstotaptheconsumermarket.Morerecentl
IntheAgeofGenetics,younolongerhavetotrytocutoutsmokingorthinktwiceaboutgobblingthatcandybarinyourdeskd
IntheAgeofGenetics,younolongerhavetotrytocutoutsmokingorthinktwiceaboutgobblingthatcandybarinyourdeskd
A、TheTalebancommanderwaskilledinaU.S.-ledcoalitionoperation.B、Manyofjournalistshadinterviewedtheone-leggedTaleb
Cultureisoneofthemostchallengingelementsofthenational1.______marketplace.Thissystemoflearnedbehaviorpatternsc
随机试题
副交感神经
商品储存的自然界限是()
婴幼儿塑料袋留尿标本法下列哪项是错误的:
环境保护验收监测时,下列污染物中,应在总排放口监测的有()。
[*]
2016年4月,保监会机关及各保监局共接收各类涉及保险消费者权益的有效投诉总量为2989件,同比上升43.15%,环比上升24.44%。其中,接收保险公司投诉2980件,其他非保险公司投诉9件。接收保险公司投诉中,涉及保险公司合同纠纷
对激发学生的学习动机,你有何建议?
设计高质量的软件是软件设计追求的一个重要目标。可移植性、可维护性、可靠性、效率、可理解性和可使用性等都是评价软件质量的重要方面。可移植性是指将一个原先在某种特定的硬件或软件环境下正常运行的软件移植到另一个硬件或软件的环境下,使得该软件也能正确运行的
Teenagersshouldn’tbe______fromschoolalthoughtheydon’tdowellinstudies.
A、Sheusedtohavesomenamecards.B、Shedidn’tliketogivehernamecardstonewfriends.C、Sheshouldhavesomenamecardsf
最新回复
(
0
)