首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2012-12-30
56
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas (push the fat guy off the bridge) and personalities that were psychopathic. Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve— inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
What function does the first sentence in the second paragraph serve?
选项
A、It further explains the theory of utilitarianism.
B、It forms a contrast to general cases of utilitarianism.
C、It acts as the connecting link to bring up the theme.
D、It gives an example to explain utilitarianism in particular cases.
答案
C
解析
篇章结构题。本文开篇介绍了功利主义这一概念,第二段首句提出“It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases.”这一个人观点,之后用恐怖主义嫌疑分子受刑为例说明功利主义可能出现的问题,由此引出Daniel Bartels和David Pizarro的实验,从第三段开始就是对两人实验过程的具体说明,可见,第二段首句为一过渡句,承上启下,由此引出全文主旨,故[C]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/23aO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
______approachisastudyoflanguagefromthepointsofviewofitsdevelopmentinthecourseoftime.
InthenewmillenniumIwanttoseedisabledpeopleacquiringthesamedegreeofcontrolovertheirlivesthatotherpeoplehave
Thepoundingrainbeganinthemiddleofthenight.ThepeopleofJackson,Ohioawoketothesoundthenwentbacktosleep.The
Youshouldnotfearspidersthankstotheirpoison.Ofallthespidersin【M1】______NorthAmerica,onlyonekindisreallyda
SincejoiningtheEuropeanEconomicCommunityin______,BritainhasadoptedtheCommunitysystemofagriculturalsupport.
Meteorologistsroutinelytelluswhatnextweek’sweatherislikelytohe,andclimatescientistsdiscusswhatmighthappenin1
Meteorologistsroutinelytelluswhatnextweek’sweatherislikelytohe,andclimatescientistsdiscusswhatmighthappenin1
ThoughnottheidealshapeforaChristmasstocking,thisslimlittlevolumecouldneverthelessmakeawelcomeseasonalgift.L
Sincethestartofthisyear,Google’ssharepricehasfallensteadilyasinvestorshavebeguntofretaboutitslonger-termpro
中国民族自古以来从不把人看作高于一切,在哲学文艺方面的表现都反映出人在自然界中与万物占着一个比例较为恰当的地位,而非绝对统治万物的主宰。因此我们的苦闷,基本上比西方人为少为小;因为苦闷的强弱原是随欲望与野心的大小而转移的。农业社会的人比工业社会的人享受差得
随机试题
()是以仓库储存形式存在的某种或某些种商品的储存数量很低,甚至可以为“零”,即不保持库存的一种状态。
对于HCO3-在近端小管重吸收的描述,恰当的是
A.补气益血B.温补气血C.益气补血健脾养心D.益气健脾养血安神E.温肾补阴人参健脾丸的功效
A.有利、公正B.权利、义务C.廉洁奉公D.医乃仁术E.等价交换属于医学伦理学基本原则的是()
《安全生产法》适用于我国领域内( )。
会计账户是根据()分别设置的。
不适于拍卖的抵债资产可以采取的变现方式不包括()。
最早明确建立以学生学习为中心的教育心理学体系的心理学家是()。(2018年)
Writeanessayof160-200wordsbasedonthefollowingdrawing.Inyouressay,youshouldfirstdescribethedrawing,theninter
Itwasnotuntilshearrivedattheclassroomsherealizedshehadforgottenhercoursebook.
最新回复
(
0
)