首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
27
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage? ( )
选项
A、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/25qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
EdmundHalleyfiguredouttheorbitof______.Thispassageingeneralisabout______.
Parentsshouldn’t______(favorable)oneoftheirchildrenmorethantheothers.
Onnoaccount______toanyonewhoworksinthecompany.
Accordingtotheauthor,feelingdepressedis______.Whyistheauthorinfavorofcommunicationthroughprintforchildren?
Maxhasno______(appreciate)ofthefinerthingsinlife.
Thispassageismainlyabouthowto______Theexpression"booksofaboutyourlevelofability..."inthefirstparagraphisc
(怪不得)hespeaksEnglishfluently.HeoftencommunicateswithforeignersinEnglish.
Theword"monopoly"(Line3,Para.1)mostprobablymeans______.SomeAmericanpeoplethoughtthat______.
Whatkindsofthingshaveactivistsdonetoprotectresearchanimals?Thepolicethinkthatuseofviolencebyanimalrightsgr
Justasnotwowordsaretrulysynonymous______notwodifferentexpressionscanmeanexactlythesamething.
随机试题
标准试剂包括()。
村民委员会召集村民会议的条件是提出召开村民会议的村民占本村村民的()
造成婴儿脑积水的常见病因有
某市A房地产开发公司(以下简称A公司)拟开发建设一大型商业用房,通过出让方式获得5公顷土地,支付土地出让金3750万元。A公司为了融资,将该土地使用权抵押给B建行,获得2000万元贷款,并办理了抵押登记,当工程建设一段时间后(经评估该在建工程的价值为220
在工程项目施工图设计阶段,监理工程师应对设计文件进行审查,审查的内容包括()。
社会需求决定社会供给,因此,从根本上说教育发展的规模和速度,是受社会成员对文化的需求决定的。()
Teachersneedtobeawareoftheemotional,intellectual,andphysicalchangesthatyoungadultsexperience.Andtheyalsoneed
下列哪一项不是J2ME中的OptionalPackages中的内容()。
Theterm"LearningDisabilities"meansadisorderinoneormoreofthebasicpsychologicalprocessesinvolvedinunderstanding
Don’tletvacationsorbusinesstravelsideline(使退出)yourexerciseroutine.Physicalactivityisagreatwayto【C1】_____stressan
最新回复
(
0
)