首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
23
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage? ( )
选项
A、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/25qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
(面对艰巨的任务),wehadbetteractonthesuggestionsmadeatthemeeting.
Tom’sparentsdiedwhenhewasachild,sohewas______byhisrelatives.
Onnoaccount______toanyonewhoworksinthecompany.
HolidaycelebrationsintheUnitedStatesoften______.TheWebster’sare______.
Infact,anyonewhowouldchallengeanother’sopinionislikelytobebrandedintolerant.
Manyuniversitycoursesarenotreally______totheneedsofstudentsortheirfutureemployers.
Youarerequiredtowriteacompositiononthefollowingtopicwithin30minutes:CompetitionandCooperationbasedontheoutli
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguesbyblackeningthecorresp
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguebyblackeningthecorrespo
Somepeopleseemtothinkthatsportsandgamesareunimportant.TheyliketowatchTVathome,gotothecinema,orsleep.【21】i
随机试题
口腔全口义齿制作时使用的蜡属于A.印模蜡B.嵌体蜡C.基托蜡D.铸造蜡E.粘蜡
患者,男,50岁。平素喜饮白酒,近日牙龈红肿作痛,伴口苦心烦,舌质暗红,脉沉数有力。应首选的药物是黄连,生物碱为其主要有效成分。下列不属于生物碱常用沉淀试剂的是
下列不是外科治疗胃十二指肠溃疡的适应证的是
看守所值班武警甲擅离职守,在押的犯罪嫌疑人乙趁机逃走,但刚跑到监狱外的树林即被抓回。关于本案,下列哪一选项是正确的?(2010年卷二2题,单选)
根据《环境影响评价技术导则一地下水环境》,二级评价项目目的含水层的水质监测点应不少于()点/层。
压杆的临界力大小与下列( )因素有关。
下列关于有限责任公司监事会的表述正确的有()。
学生因为害怕课堂提问而焦虑,进而对外语学习产生严重的恐惧。这是一种条什反射的分化过程。
国家垄断资本主义是()
Picture-takingisatechniquebothforreflectingtheobjectiveworldandforexpressingthesingularself.Photographsdepicto
最新回复
(
0
)