首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
26
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage? ( )
选项
A、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/25qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Forthispartyouareallowed30minutestowriteacompositiononthetopic:SocialActivitiesandOurStudy.Youshouldwrite
Thelastcenturysawasteadygradualincreaseinliteracy,andthusinthenumberofreaders.
Thefirstsailorpretendedtobeillbecausehewantedto______.Thepatientsfeltbetterquicklybecause______.
NotuntilMr.SmithcametoChina______whatkindofcountrysheis.
(他别无选择)buttolayfactsbeforethepublicexactlyastheyoccurred.
Onetypeofpersonthatiscommonineverycountryistheonewho______.Bothofthesetypesofpeopleareusually______thei
Allofthesethingsaslistedabovearethe______ones,thethingsthatevery-bodyknowsabout.
Somepeopleseemtothinkthatsportsandgamesareunimportant.TheyliketowatchTVathome,gotothecinema,orsleep.【21】i
Theworld’soceanshavewarmed50percentfasteroverthelast40yearsthanpreviouslythoughtduetoclimatechange,Australia
随机试题
关于小张、小李书法学习的情况,有如下判断:(1)如果小张学习魏碑,那么小李学习汉隶;(2)小张既没有学习秦篆,也没有学习魏碑;(3)小张或者学习秦篆,或者学习魏碑。结果发现,上述判断有两项是错误的。根据以上信息,可以得出以下哪项结论?
______属于损益类账户。
阅读小说片段,回答问题:赵七爷是邻村茂源酒店的主人,又是这三十里方圆以内的唯一的出色人物兼学问家;因为有学问,所以又有些遗老的臭味。他有十多本金圣叹批评的《三国志》,时常坐着一个字一个字的读;他不但能说出五虎将姓名,甚而至于还知道黄忠表字汉升和马
调凹法是将A.缺隙两端基牙的倒凹平均分配B.倒凹适当集中于一端基牙C.模型向倒凹较大的一方颊侧倾斜D.模型向倒凹较小的一方舌侧倾斜E.模型向基牙颊侧倾斜
根据《证券法》,下列说法正确的是:()
《建设工程质量管理条例》中所称的建设工程是指( )。
根据《证券公司为期货公司提供中间介绍业务试行办法》,证券公司应当在营业场所妥善保存有关介绍业务的凭证、单据、账簿、报表、合同、数据信息等资料。保存上述文件资料的期限不得少于( )年。
(2017年)某企业本月生产甲、乙两种产品分别耗用机器工时50000小时和70000小时,当月车间设备维修费96000元(不考虑增值税),车间管理人员工资24000元,该企业按照机器工时分配制造费用。不考虑其他因素,当月甲产品应分担的制造费用为(
A、 B、 C、 D、 A
A—officepinB—officeclockC—penholderD—notepaperE—globeF—staplerG—memoholderH—paperfastenerI—tapedispenserJ—letter
最新回复
(
0
)