首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
17
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage? ( )
选项
A、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/25qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Insomecountries,______iscalled"equality"doesnotreallymeanequalrightsforallpeople.
Colorandsexarenotrelevant______whetherapersonissuitableforthejob.
Thisresearchhasattractedwidecoverageinthe______andhasfeaturedonBBCtelevision’sTomorrow’sWorld.
Accordingtotheauthor,feelingdepressedis______.Thephenomenonthattoday’schildrenseemadult-likeisattributedbythe
Childrenhaveanatural______(curious)abouttheworldaroundthem.
Thereareseveralmeansofmasscommunication.Thenewspaperisone.Televisionis______.
Ihadcutthemeatintopieces______motherstartedcooking.
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguesbyblackeningthecorresp
Youseldomgotothecinemaontheweekends,______?
随机试题
分层抽样
在我国,下列有权向全国人民代表大会常务委员会提出法律案的是()
某患者,女,16岁,活动后心慌、气短、胸痛两周,两周前曾患“感冒”,持续发热一周。查体:面色苍白,心界向左下扩大,P120次/分,频发早搏。第一心音减弱,心尖区闻及奔马律及3/6级全收缩期杂音,心肌酶谱检查CK-MB80IU/L。最有可能的诊断是
具有明显的首关消除的药物
以下行为效力待定的是()
实行建设监理制度对提高工程项目的经济效益发挥了重要作用,其主要表现有()
证券市场里的投资者可以分为( )。
下列耕地占用行为,减按每平方米2元的税额征收耕地占用税的是()。(2017年考题改编)
[*]
Everyhumanbeingisfallible;wemakemistakes.InAmericawhenamistakehasbeenmade,itisconsideredfittingfortheperso
最新回复
(
0
)