首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
16
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage? ( )
选项
A、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/25qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Theheadmasteroftheschoolhadthesupportofa______numberofparents.
Therapiddevelopmentofcommunicationstechnologyistransformingthe______inwhichpeoplecommunicateacrosstimeandspace.
Althoughthisdiseaseisincurableatpresent,theykeepexpecting______.
Onetypeofpersonthatiscommonineverycountryistheonewho______.Intheend,themanwhotriestodoaslittleashec
Allofthesethingsaslistedabovearethe______ones,thethingsthatevery-bodyknowsabout.
Theauthorsayschildreninthecityseldomwenttothewoodsandthefieldsbecause______.Bysaying"Hisideawasasuccess"
—I’mafraidIhavetogonowJim.—I’dratheryou______goalone,It’salreadytoolate.
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguesbyblackeningthecorresp
_______roomsarebothlargeandcomfortable.
Youmustn’tmind______troubleoverthecookingifyouwantyourgueststoenjoytheirmeal.
随机试题
低血钾是指血清钾至少要低于
男性,60岁,吸烟40年,有结核病接触史,体检拍胸片发现右上肺于第3前肋间近外侧胸壁处有直径2cm结节影,边缘不清。3次痰液检查均未发现癌细胞和抗酸杆菌。为明确诊断,最好行下列哪种检查
关于环境影响评价中应用环境标准的原则的说法,正确的是()
燃气管道穿越河底时,燃气管道宜采用()。
对于建设工程项目管理风险而言,风险是指可能出现的( )的不确定因素。
钢铁公司与矿业公司之间的货款支付,双方可以采取下列支付结算方式中的()。钢铁公司向其开户银行提交“银行汇票申请书”,申请出票金额为30万元,汇付给矿业公司。开户银行受理时,发现其账户实际存款只有25万元,对此,开户银行应当()。
某公司为了提高轮胎的质量,应用排列图分析造成轮胎不合格品的各种原因,发现“耐磨度”占第一位。为了解决“耐磨度”问题,再次应用排列图分析造成“耐磨度”的原因,结果发现主要是由于原材料质量不稳定造成的。为此厂方决定应用控制图对“耐磨度”进行过程控制。应该采
根据下列图形回答下列问题。
以下列举的哪些属于大陆法系和英美法系的区别()
BythetimeBobarrivesinBeijing,wehavealreadyarrivedherefortwodays.
最新回复
(
0
)