首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
35
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage? ( )
选项
A、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/25qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Forthispartyouareallowed30minutestowriteacompositiononthetopic:SocialActivitiesandOurStudy.Youshouldwrite
Johnpromisedtokeephismother______ofhowthingsweregoingonwhenhestudiedinEngland.
Theheadmasteroftheschoolhadthesupportofa______numberofparents.
Parentsshouldn’t______(favorable)oneoftheirchildrenmorethantheothers.
Personalinterviewingisusuallyusedwhentheinformationneededistoocomplextobegatheredbyanothertechnique,
HolidaycelebrationsintheUnitedStatesoften______.NationalAdoptionmonthis______.
Americansenjoyfastfoodmainlybecause______.Theexpression"pitchinwith"inParagraph2probablymeans______.
Americansenjoyfastfoodmainlybecause______.Accordingtothetext,adrive-inwindowis______.
YourofferisveryattractivebutIneedto______beforeIletyouknowmydecision.
Mr.Smithgavehiswifetenpoundforherbirthday--tenprettypoundnotes.Sothedayafterherbirthday,MrsSmithwentshoppi
随机试题
下列选项中,属于针刺单式补泻手法的是
A.鲜红色B.暗红色C.陶土色D.柏油样便E.果酱样便阿米巴痢疾或肠套叠时,粪便呈
下列属于《施工合同条件》(新红皮书)的适用条件的是()
下面可以用三维表面来表示的事物是()。
在房地产开发项目的施工中,如果施工企业将施工的商品房卖给该工程的材料供应商,则该买卖合同( )。
“买者自负”即产品的购买者要从购买行为中获得利益也要自己承担决策风险。()
甲公司2×15年发生的部分交易事项如下:(1)2×15年4月1、日,甲公司对9名高管人员每人授予20万份甲公司认股权证,每份认股权证持有人有权在2×16年1月1日按每股10元的价格购买1股甲公司股票。该认股权证不附加其他行权条件,无论行权日相关人员是否在
在保险期限内,某业主房屋由于遭受战争时期炸弹的袭击,起火受损,保险人无需赔付此房屋的火灾险,依据的原则是()。
决议适用于对重要事项作出决策和部署、奖惩有关单位和人员、变更或者撤销下级机关不适当的决定事项。()
Thelongestbullruninacenturyofart-markethistoryendedonadramaticnotewithasaleof56worksbyDamienHirst,Beauti
最新回复
(
0
)