首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Civil-Liberties advocates reeling from the recent revelations on surveillance had something else to worry about last week: the p
Civil-Liberties advocates reeling from the recent revelations on surveillance had something else to worry about last week: the p
admin
2012-01-05
51
问题
Civil-Liberties advocates reeling from the recent revelations on surveillance had something else to worry about last week: the privacy of the billions of search queries made on sites like Google, AOL, Yahoo and Microsoft. As part of a long-running court case, the government has asked those companies to turn over information on its users’ search behavior. All but Google have handed over data, and now the Department of Justice (DOJ) has moved to compel the search giant to turn over the goods.
What makes this case different is that the intended use of the information is not related to national security, but the government’s continuing attempt to police Internet pornography. In 1998, Congress passed the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), but courts have blocked its implementation due to First Amendment concerns. In its appeal, the DOJ wants to prove how easy it is to inadvertently stumble upon pore. In order to conduct a controlled experiment—to be performed by a UC Berkeley professor of statistics—the DOJ wants to use a large sample of actual search terms from the different search engines. It would then use those terms to do its own searches, employing the different kinds of filters each search engine offers, in an attempt to quantify how often "material that is harmful to minors" might appear. Google contends that since it is not a party to the case, the government has not right to demand its proprietary information to perform its test. "We intend to resist their motion vigorously," said Google attorney Nicole Wong.
DOJ spokesperson Charles Miller says that the government is requesting only the actual search terms, and not anything that would link the queries to those who made them. (The DOJ is also demanding a list of a million Web sites that Google indexes to determine the degree to which objectionable sites are searched. ) Originally, the government asked for a treasure trove of all searches made in June and July 2005; the request has been scaled back to one week’s worth of search queries.
One oddity about the DOJ’s strategy is that the experiment could conceivably sink its own case. If the built-in filters that each search engine provides are effective in blocking porn sites, the government will have wound up proving what the opposition has said all along—you don’t need to suppress speech to protect minors on the Net."We think that our filtering technology does a good job protecting minors from inadvertently seeing adult content," says Ramez Naam, group program manager of MSN Search.
Though the government intends to use these data specifically for its COPA-related test, it’s possible that the information could lead to further investigations and, perhaps, subpoenas to find out who was doing the searching. "What if certain search terms indicated that people were contemplating terrorist actions or other criminal activities?" Says the DOJ’s Miller, "I’m assuming that if something raised alarms, we would hand it over to the proper authorities." Privacy advocates fear that if the government request is upheld, it will open the door to further government examination of search behavior. One solution would be for Google to stop storing the information, but the company hopes to eventually use the personal information of consenting customers to improve search performance. " Search is a window into people’s personalities," says Kurt Opsahl, an Electronic Frontier Foundation attorney. "They should be able to take advantage of the Internet without worrying about Big Brother looking over their shoulders."
Google refused to turn over "its proprietary information" ( Para. 2 ) required by DOJ as it believes that ______.
选项
A、it is not involved in the court case
B、users’ privacy is most important
C、the government has violated the First Amendment
D、search terms is the company’s business secret
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/2Aua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
dialecticalmaterialism
CarvingADragonattheCoreofLiterature
Allowingourcitiestobe______bycarshasprogressivelyaffectedchildren’sindependentmobility,forchildrenhavelostmuch
TheSupremeCourt’sdecisionsonphysician-assistedsuicidecarryimportant______forhowmedicineseekstorelievedyingpatie
AuthorKatherineSherwoodMcdowellhadaknackforconvertingalmosteveryexperienceintomarketableprose.
Correctionofthestudent’saberrantpronunciationisacontinual,on-goingprocess,notsomethingreservedforlessonsorexerc
Oneimportantoutcomeoftheworkontheexpressionofgenesindevelopingembryosissuretobeknowledgethatcanhelpp
Inadditiontourgetoconformwhichwegenerateourselves,thereistheexternalpressureofthevariousformalandinformalgr
InSaudiArabia,amonarchywhereconservativeIslamprevailsandnomodifiedsystemoflawexists,women’smobilityisstrongly
Pleaseexplaininyourownwordswhystresscancauseaviciousacademiccycle.(ThisquestionisbasedonPassage4)
随机试题
违法行为情节显著轻微或者没有明显社会危害的,可以不采取行政强制措施。
为组合业绩提供一种“既考虑收益高低又考虑风险大小”的评估理论依据的是()。
下面的词中属于古语词的是
受振动或高速荷载作用的结构用钢,应特别注意选用()。
判别一项成本是否是可控成本,应该满足的条件有()。
甲公司和乙公司均为增值税—般纳税人,适用的增值税税率均为17%。有关债务重组和资产置换业务如下。(1)2011年2月1日。乙公司销售—批商品给甲公司,购货款及税款合计700万元。8月1日款项到期,由于甲公司发生财务困难,不能按合同规定支付货款,2011年
一1,3,一3,6,一9,12,()
(2005年国考)长期以来,在传统观念的影响下,对于司法机关在执法过程中侵害公民、法人和其他组织的合法权益的行为,缺乏有效可行的保障机制来恢复和弥补被侵权人的权利。这段文字的主旨是()。
ParentsintheirfortieswanttheirchildrentogetthebesteducationbecauseIntheparents’view,entrytoagooduniversity
WhatdoesthemanneedtodobeforetakingthecourseinPoetsofthe1960’s?
最新回复
(
0
)