首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A、Petrol consumption. B、Speed. C、Safety. D、Comfortability. B
A、Petrol consumption. B、Speed. C、Safety. D、Comfortability. B
admin
2013-10-08
32
问题
Interview with Peter Moore, the Chief-Engineer of OPEL
Interviewer: The cars you are making today will come to the market in the year 2000. ’Will there be any fundamental changes?
Mr. Moore: No, the time is too short for such kind of changes. It takes 5 years at a minimum to develop a completely new car. For engines it takes even a longer time. The engine for one model usually serves for 15 or even 20 years, and there are only slight changes during this period. There is also a certain insistence on a big automaker’s mind that it should keep its characteristic style which makes its cars different. That is to say in spite of the changes an Opel still has to look like an Opel at least within several years’ time. That’s why there won’t be any revolutionary changes in the next few years. I would say it will only be a step by step evolution.
Interviewer: What are your major considerations in the development of a new car?
Mr. Moore: The first and most important thing is to lower the consumption of petrol. So that we will not only have an economical ear, but also an environmentally friendly one. The active and passive safetiesfor the passengers are also very important. Last but not least, a car should be comfortable and provide all facilities for an enjoyable ride. I think building a car for the future with these considerations Will lead us to success.
Interviewer: Yes, at the moment it seems to become increasingly important to make a car enjoyable. The cars are becoming faster and faster.
Mr. Moore: That’s right. Today a 100 HP-engine is more powerful than a 100 HP-engine 10 years ago. In this area, automakers really have achieved a great deal in increasing the efficiency of the engine.
Interviewer: But do we actually need faster cars? Our cities are almost totally blocked up with traffic; our highways are so crowded that at any time of the day it is impossible to drive fast. The average speed in the city during rush hours is only about 20 km an hour. Everyone on a bicycle could be faster than that.
Mr. Moore: But that is only the case during rush hours. On the highways, I think there are enough opportunities for you to drive fast. People do need to drive fast in certain occasions. Besides, driving fast is a lot of fun. The increased efficiency also brings about a positive effect. Today all our cars use considerably less petrol than only a few years ago. The average consumption of petrol for all Opel models ranges about 7. 45 liters per 100 kilometers. It was even hard to imagine 10 years ago.
Interviewer: How are the chances for alternative fuels like hydrogen and electricity?
Mr. Moore: From the technical point of view alternatives like methanol or alcohol are no problem. But they are still too expensive and for this reason have no big chances. Regarding the hydrogen there still exist technical problems. The amount of hydrogen that can be carried on a car as its fuel is simply still too limited. As to the electro-car we should not forget that the electrical power has to be generated first. Here are the existing problems with the power-stations. Another problem is the weight. For carrying as much energy as what is contained in a 70-11ter petrol-tank, we would need a battery weighing 2.5 tons. I’m sure the electro-car will continue to develop we already have experimental electro-cars in use—but it’s impossible for them to play the main role in transport within the next few years.
Interviewer: What about solar energy? What do you think of the so-called "solar-car"?
Mr. Moore: There is still a great deal of research to be done on the use of solar energy. Recently we conducted some tests in Australia where we covered a distance of 3,500 kilometers. But the average speed of the test car only reached 65 kilometers per hour. A petrol engine with the same capacity would have wasted only 0.8 liters of petrol per 100 kilometers—and this is done without any expensive petrol-saving accessory. That shows the strength of the petrol-engine. Interviewer: In that case, is it still worthwhile then to carry out experiments on alternative energies?
Mr. Moore: They are a challenge for the fancies of our engineers and a contribution towards the development of new ideas. From this point of view they are very useful. But before long the petrol engine will show its strength. That is the reason why we cannot reckon on any cars with an alternative energy for the next century.
选项
A、Petrol consumption.
B、Speed.
C、Safety.
D、Comfortability.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/2BZO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TherevolutionaryleaderoftheEnglishCivilWarwas______.
SimilaritiesandDifferencesbetweenPublicSpeakingandConversationI.BothPublicSpeakingandConversationneedyouto1.or
People’sattitudetowarddrugsvariesfrompersontoperson.Someregarditas(1)_____miraculous;othersthinkofthemasdang
Agreatmanycitiesareexperiencingdifficultieswhicharenothingnewinthehistoryofcities,exceptintheirscale.Somec
CultureShockI.CultureshockPeoplehavedifficultyin(1)_____toanewculturecompletelydifferentfromtheirown.Theshock
进入21世纪,发达国家所面临的共同问题,不是缺资金,而是缺人才;不是缺最新的资讯,而是缺最新的知识。“知识”变成了一个国家是否进步的关键因素。把相关的知识有系统地运用到经济活动中,现在泛称为“知识经济”。唯有通过外在的教育与学习,浩瀚的资讯才可能
TheClassicalSenseofGoodGovernmentPoliticsplaysanextremelyimportantroleinhumansociety.Politicalphilosopherss
TheClassicalSenseofGoodGovernmentPoliticsplaysanextremelyimportantroleinhumansociety.Politicalphilosopherss
TheClassicalSenseofGoodGovernmentPoliticsplaysanextremelyimportantroleinhumansociety.Politicalphilosopherss
The(Non)RisksofMobilePhonesDomobilephonescauseexplosionsatpetrolstations?Thatquestionhasjustbeenexhaustiv
随机试题
A.血浆清除率等于零B.血浆清除率等于每分钟肾的血浆流量C.血浆清除率等于肾小球滤过率D.血浆清除率大于肾小球滤过率E.血浆清除率小于肾小球滤过率某物质可被肾小球自由滤过,又可被肾小管分泌,但不被肾小管重吸收,其()。
《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》对发盘内容“十分确定”的解释是
确认,识别vt.i_______
性大寒,专泻肺中水饮及痰火的药物是
护士指导正常孕妇产前检查的时间正确的是
小肠所特有的运动形式是()。
对生产性项目进行寿命周期成本评价时,可列入工程系统效率的是()。
一个人在他人面前想表现出的形象被称为()。
假定所涉及的反常积分(广义积分)收敛,证明:
以太网100BASE-TX标准规定的传输介质是(61)。
最新回复
(
0
)