首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthroug
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthroug
admin
2013-11-30
82
问题
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthrough in science poses a new problem—whether it’ s safe for people to eat them. Experts say that much of the current angst over genetically modified foods is unnecessary. If research and development are allowed to continue, the products will be there for all to appreciate.
New varieties of rice and other crops, resistant to insects and diseases, will have replaced those cultivated today. Farmers will no longer lose substantial proportions of their harvests. The impact of these advances will be felt in the less developed countries. Health benefits will also come from plants genetically engineered to be more balanced nutritionally than those that have evolved through natural selection or been bred by traditional methods.
The potential medical spin-offs from plant biotechnology are considerable. A new generation of more potent vaccines, many against illness for which no vaccines have been available, will be grown in plants such as maize and bananas.
Malnutrition could be banished. Biotechnology can improve efficiency of food production and generate more nourishing crops.
Throughout the world, gardeners, vegetarians, and consumers will benefit from plant varieties resistant to spoilage, foods which reduce our dependence on animals, and cheaper and/or tastier products.
We should not, however, overlook potential hazards in altering our diets by genetic engineering. As with all other applications of science to human welfare, biotechnology is likely to have risks. Mistakes will probably be made.
Nevertheless, any analysis of the new techniques for ferrying genes between plants must surely conclude that they are being applied and controlled more stringently than any technology ever before.
Nearly 25 years ago, when scientists first learned to combine DNA from different sources, commentators warned of the iniquity of "opening Pandora’ s box". Among their horrific forecast were unstoppable epidemics and worldwide pestilence. None of these has come to pass, partly because genetic manipulation has not proved inherently dangerous.
In addition, regulatory committees have been set up to ensure that experiments are conducted in appropriately safe conditions.
The regulators’ task is not simply to allow research to go ahead unless potential hazards are obvious. It is to consider risks that could come to light later. Will a gene, introduced intorape to protect it against virus attack, also make the pollen grains more likely to cause hay fever? All proposals have to survive positive vetting of this sort before they are sanctioned.
Genetic engineering is far more precise—and thus predictable—than the gene movements which occur in nature. When plants fertilize and cross-fertilize in the wild, large numbers of genes are transferred in a haphazard fashion.
Biotechnology allows individual genes to be moved with precision from one plant to another. It is much easier to know how one gene will work in its new setting. The likelihood of unexpected consequences and the margin of error are correspondingly reduced. There is a chance, however remote, that a gene introduced into a particular plant at one time and location might have adverse consequences if it eventually gets into another plant distant in space and time.
Given the astronomical amount of random gene transfer which occurs through the biosphere such extreme caution is unwarranted. I believe most food producers—and eaters—would agree.
Despite the possibility of introduction of a gene into a particular plant at one time and location, the author contends that such extreme caution about genetic technology is unwarranted because______.
选项
A、there are regulatory committees
B、in labs gene ferrying is being applied and controlled stringently
C、genetic engineering is far more precise than the natural gene movement
D、the possibility of such an event is too small
答案
C
解析
从第十一段Genetic engineering is far more precise than the gene movements which occurin nature可直接找出答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/2CU3777K
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
治疗SLE时,若大剂量激素+免疫抑制剂使用4~12周后,病情仍无明显改善,则应加用
Thisisablankettermthatcoversawiderangeoforalactivitiesthathaveanelementof______.
Youfeelgenerallydepressedandunabletoconcentrate.Your【C1】______ofdailyactivitymaychange;youfindyourself【C2】______a
Everyonehasseenithappen.Acolleaguewhohasbeenexcited,involved,andproductiveslowlybeginstopullback,loseenergy
Someproblemscanbereadilyidentifiedsimplybylookingaround.Theseproblemsconcernthepollutionofourenvironmentbytec
WELL—dotheyordon’tthey?Foryears,controversyhasragedoverwhethertheelectromagneticfieldsproducedbypowerlinescou
Thereisagreatironyof21st-centuryglobalhealth:Whilemanyhundredsofmillionsofpeoplelackadequatefoodasaresulto
A、Thosewhostoptakingantidepressants.B、Thosewhoaskformoremedications.C、Thosewhoareonthemedications.D、Thosewhoa
Thegirlcouldnot______thetemptationofthepieceofchocolateandtoldalie.
A、Inadoctor’soffice.B、Inanoperatingroom.C、Inaprofessor’soffice.D、Inagymnasium.A从“Pleasehaveaseat.Sheisinsur
随机试题
简述何谓管理?如何理解管理的具体含义?
A.手术治疗B.药物治疗C.糖皮质激素治疗D.血管紧张素治疗特醛症首选的治疗为
起搏器最基本的心脏起搏方式为
体内内源性配体的生理浓度通常是
原位溶血见于
一个长146千米的山区公路分为上坡、平地和下坡三段,其中上下坡的距离相等。某越野车以上坡20千米每小时、平地30千米每小时、下坡50千米每小时的速度行驶,跑完该条公路正好用时5小时,该山路中的平地路程为多少千米?
作为人的身心发展的生理前提,为人的身心发展提供了可能性的因素是()。
根据《中华人民共和国城市居民委员会组织法》的规定,居民会议由社区党组织召集和主持。()
当人们闻气味时,如果感觉到挥发在空气中的化学物质,就会对这种刺激性的气味作出反应。植物也会对气味产生反应,最明显的实例是果实成熟时的情形一一如果将一枚成熟的果实和一枚尚未成熟的果实放在一个袋子里,未成熟的果实会更快成熟。这是因为成熟的果实散发出一种“成熟信
考生文件夹下存在一个数据库文件“samp3.accdb”,里面已经设计了表对象“tEmp”、查询对象“qEmp”和窗体对象“fEmp”。同时,给出窗体对象“fEmp”上两个按钮的单击事件代码,试按以下要求补充设计。(1)将窗体“fEmp”上名称为
最新回复
(
0
)