首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
admin
2013-11-29
67
问题
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish population is in shrinking. The study, the National Jewish Population Survey, found 5.2 million Jews living in the United States in 2000, a drop of 5 percent, or 300,000 people, since a similar study in 1990.What’s truly startling is that the reported decline is not true. Worse still, the sponsor of the $6 million study, United Jewish Communities, knows it.
Both it and the authors have openly admitted their doubts. They have acknowledged in interviews that the population totals for 2000 and 1990 were reached by different methods and are not directly comparable. The survey itself also cautions readers, in a dauntingly technical appendix, that judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount. When the research director and project director were asked whether the data should be construed to indicate a declining Jewish population, they flatly answered no. In addition, other survey researchers interviewed pointed to other studies with population estimates as high as 6.7 million.
Despite all this, the two figures—5.2 million now, 5.5 million then—are listed by side in the survey, leaving the impression that the population has shrunk. The result, predictably, has been a rash of headlines trumpeting the illusionary decline, in turn touching off jeremiads by rabbis and. moralists condemning the religious laxity behind it. Whether out of ideology, ego, incompetence or a combination of all three, the respected charity has invented a crisis.
United Jewish Communities is the coordinating body for a national network of Jewish philanthropies with combined budgets of $2 billion. Its population surveys carry huge weight in shaping community policy. This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm. The last one, conducted by a predecessor organization, found that 52 percent of American Jews who married between 1985 and 1990 did so outside the faith. That number was a fabrication produced by including marriages in which neither party was Jewish by anyone’s definition, including the researchers.
Its publication created a huge stir, inspiring anguished sermons, books and conferences. It put liberals on the defensive, emboldened conservatives who reject full integration into society and alienated ordinary folks by the increasingly xenophobic tone of Jewish communal culture. The new survey, to its credit, retracts that figure and offers the latest survey has spawned a panic created by the last one.
So why did the organization flawed figures once again? Some scholars who have studied the survey believe the motivation then came partly out of a desire to shock straying Jews into greater observance. It’s too early to tell if that’s the case this time around. What is clear is the researchers did their job with little regard to how their data could be misconstrued. They used statistical models and question formats that, while internally sound, made the new survey incompatible with the previous one. For example, this time the researchers divided the population of 5.2 million into two groups—"highly involved" Jews and "people of Jewish background" — and posed most questions only to the first group. As a result, most findings about belief and observance refer only to a subgroup of American Jews, making comparisons to the past impossible.
We can’t afford to wait a decade before these figures are revised. The false population decline must be corrected before it further sours communal discourse. The United Jewish Communities owes it to itself and its public to step forward and state plainly what it knows to be true: American Jews are not disappearing.
How does the population survey get it wrong in 2000?
选项
A、The population total in 2000 was reached by different method from that in 1990.
B、There might be some problems with the judgment calls by the researchers.
C、United Jewish Communities offered not enough financial support to the survey.
D、It is the result of the rash of headlines leaving the impression that the population has declined.
答案
B
解析
答案在第二段:judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount.
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/2yZO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
ThebiggestproblemfacingChileasitpromotesitselfasatouristdestinationisthatitisattheendoftheearth.Itisto
AccordingtoOxfordEnglishDictionary,bookis"awrittenorprintedtreatiseorseriesoftreatises,occupyingseveralsheets
Australiahasbeenacontinentwithfewpeoplemainlybecauseof
Therelationshipbetween"flower"and"violet"is
About85%ofAmericanstudentsattend______schools,theother15%attend______schools,forwhichtheirfamilieschoosetopay
DumbandDumber,oneofthemodernclassicsofAmericancomedy,tellsthestoryofanaffableidiot,LloydChristmas,whofalls
Anystudentsettingoutonacademiccareerinscienceislikelytobecomeincreasinglyseparatedfromhumanitiesandsociety.Ev
Itiscommonforstudentsinhighschooltowonderifcollegeeducationisreallyimportant.Manyhighschoolstudentsdon’ten
Itiscommonforstudentsinhighschooltowonderifcollegeeducationisreallyimportant.Manyhighschoolstudentsdon’ten
ThefirstrealorganizedefforttounitingEuropecame(1)______withthecreationoftheCouncilofEurope,wasestablished(2)
随机试题
为了更好地介绍公司的服务与市场战略,市场部助理小王需要协助制作完成公司战略规划文档,并调整文档的外观与格式。现在,请你按照如下需求,在Word.docx文档中完成制作工作:调整文档纸张大小为A4幅面,纸张方向为纵向:并调整上、下页边距为2.5厘米,左、
本例最可能的诊断是对本病治疗无效的药物是
《建设工程质量管理条例》规定,给予单位罚款处罚的,对单位直接负责的主管人员和其他直接人员处单位罚款数额________罚款。
重置价格折旧法是成本估价法具体应用中的一种评估方法,适合对所有旧建筑物估价。()
某上市公司监事会有5名监事,其中监事赵某、张某为职工代表,监事任期届满,该公司职工代表大会在选举监事时,认为赵某、张某未能认真履行职责,故一致决议改选陈某、王某为监事会成员。按照《证券法》的规定,该上市公司应通过一定的方式将该信息予以披露,该信息披露的方式
企业破产清算时,破产财产在支付债权人债务前,应先支付( )。
公安机关的性质和职能决定了公安机关的任务。()
阅读短文,完成96—100题。人们要找出自然的规律,不借助对称也很难。也许正是因为这样,自然才一次次地打破人们先前找到的对称。这种现象在物理学中的表现很明显,大概是因为物理学是个很重视规律的科学吧。且不说完美的牛顿力学如何不能完好地解释自然
在平日,天文学是一门比较专业的学科,然而近几年来每逢罕见天文现象上演,都会成为公众关注的一大热点。其实不管日全食还是金星凌日,其观测对于科学研究的意义,已随着天文学设备和理论的不断完善而日趋削弱,相反,其科普意义愈发令人关注,也令天文“流行”起来。对这段文
______makesmistakesmustcorrectthem.
最新回复
(
0
)