首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2012-01-19
65
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specially, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision-making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision-making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
In the eyes of the author, conventional opinion on conflict is ______.
选项
A、wrong
B、oversimplified
C、misleading
D、unclear
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/38xd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
successfully
WhenhediesinAprilof1983,Dr.JoelHildebrandwas101yearsold,whohadbeenmarriedforseventy-fiveyears,andhadtaugh
【61】Itisawell-knownfactthatthereareconstantconflictsamongdifferentgroupsofpeople,andthatpeopletendtoblamet
Tobesuccessfulinajobinterview,youshouldtakecaretoappearmodestlydressed,avoidingtheextremesoftooelaborateor
Tobesuccessfulinajobinterview,youshouldtakecaretoappearmodestlydressed,avoidingtheextremesoftooelaborateor
CopernicuswasborninTorun,Poland,onFebrury19,1473.Littleisknownabouthisearlylifeexceptthathisfatherdiedwhen
Scientistsbelievethatpeople"dressedup"longbeforetheymadeahabitofwearingclothes.Primitivemandressedhimselfinf
WhatisSaffoaccordingtohimself?
随机试题
某企业采用德尔菲法选定11名专家对某产品的市场需求进行预测,最后一轮数据见表(单位:万台),用中位数法进行预测,为()台。
下列各项中,基于被审计单位管理层“计价或分摊”认定推论得出的有关“存货”具体审计目标有()
有头疽的整个病程为
木香的功效是青木香的功效是
【2008年第4题】题6~10:一座66/10kV重要变电所,装有容量为16000kVA的主变压器两台,采用蓄电池直流操作系统,所有断路器配电磁操作机构,控制、信号等经常负荷为2000W,事故照明负荷为1000w,最大一台断路器合闸电流为98A。请回答下列
社会主要矛盾内涵的转化,表现为供给和需求两侧的结构都逐步发生变化。其实,几年前中央提出我国进入发展新常态,随后又提出供给侧结构性改革,就表明已经认识到社会主要矛盾内涵的变化,但并没有超越供给不能满足需求的总框架。而且应当认识到,党的十九大报告讲了主要矛盾的
当x>0时,
局域网中,提供并管理共享资源的计算机称为()。
TheIndependentonSunday’s【76】(industry)editor,DavidBowen,collectsairlinesick-bags.Hestartedabout10yearsagowhenh
A、Hecan’tfindthetickets.B、Hedoesn’twanttositinthefront.C、Hewouldratherstandthansitdown.D、Heexpectsthehall
最新回复
(
0
)