首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2012-01-19
123
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specially, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision-making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision-making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
In the eyes of the author, conventional opinion on conflict is ______.
选项
A、wrong
B、oversimplified
C、misleading
D、unclear
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/38xd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Itwasin1812,inavillageinFrance.Alittleboytrippedandfellwithpointedtoolsinhishand.Inthataccidenthebecame
WhenhediesinAprilof1983,Dr.JoelHildebrandwas101yearsold,whohadbeenmarriedforseventy-fiveyears,andhadtaugh
WhenhediesinAprilof1983,Dr.JoelHildebrandwas101yearsold,whohadbeenmarriedforseventy-fiveyears,andhadtaugh
WhenhediesinAprilof1983,Dr.JoelHildebrandwas101yearsold,whohadbeenmarriedforseventy-fiveyears,andhadtaugh
Conventionalwisdomaboutconflictseemsprettymuchcutanddried.Toolittleconflictbreedsapathy(冷漠)andstagnation(呆滞).
Conventionalwisdomaboutconflictseemsprettymuchcutanddried.Toolittleconflictbreedsapathy(冷漠)andstagnation(呆滞).
CopernicuswasborninTorun,Poland,onFebrury19,1473.Littleisknownabouthisearlylifeexceptthathisfatherdiedwhen
WhatisSaffoaccordingtohimself?
WhatisSaffoaccordingtohimself?
随机试题
少阳头痛可选用下列哪组引经药
自动喷水灭火系统的设置场所危险等级划分将高层广播电视大楼划分为中危险级Ⅱ级。()
应用含肾上腺素的利多卡因行局部浸润麻醉时,利多卡因一次最大剂量是
甲向法院自诉乙犯侮辱罪。法院受理后,乙反诉甲诽谤罪。经法院审查符合反诉条件,合并审理此案。法院判处乙侮辱罪有期徒刑1年,判处甲诽谤罪有期徒刑1年。甲、乙二人不服,均以对方量刑过轻、己方量刑过重为由提出上诉。根据刑诉法的规定,二审法院的终审判决应当如何作出?
两个小组生产同样的零件,第一组的废品率是2%,第二组的产量是第一组的2倍而废品率是3%,若两组生产的零件放在一起,从中任抽取一件,经检查是废品,则这件废品是第一组生产的概率为()。
2015年12月31日,甲公司对一起未决诉讼确认的预计负债为300万元。2016年3月6日,法院对该起诉讼判决,甲公司应赔偿乙公司500万元;甲公司和乙公司均不再上诉。甲公司适用的所得税税率为15%,按净利润的10%提取法定盈余公积,2015年度财务报告批
材料中的主人公主要负责市容管理工作,分管小区的垃圾分类工作。材料中有相关具体措施,比如向各家各户免费发放垃圾袋,垃圾筐。进行垃圾分类的宣传。但是此小区居民多为拆迁户,素质不高,不了解垃圾分类的好处。虽然工作做了很多,但是效果不理想,道路两旁还是有很多垃圾乱
某项目组的测试团队对项目的功能及性能进行全面测试,来保证项目的可交付成果及工作满足主要干系人的既定需求。项目组所采用的质量管理方式是______。
respect
HowtoBuildYourVocabularyEffectivelyVocabularyisthe(1)______oflearningalanguage,withthehelpofit,alltheskill
最新回复
(
0
)