2. 考研
  3. We assumed ethics needed the seal of certainty, else it was non-rational. And certainty was to be produced by a deductive model:

We assumed ethics needed the seal of certainty, else it was non-rational. And certainty was to be produced by a deductive model:

admin2014-06-13  38
问题     We assumed ethics needed the seal of certainty, else it was non-rational. And certainty was to be produced by a deductive model: the correct actions were derivable from classical first principles or a hierarchically ranked pantheon of principles. This model, though, is bankrupt.
    I suggest we think of ethics as analogous to language usage. There are no univocal rules of grammar and style which uniquely determine the best sentence for a particular situation. Nor is language usage universalizable. Although a sentence or phrase is warranted in one case, it does not mean it is automatically appropriate in like circumstances. Nonetheless, language usage is not subjective.
    This should not surprise us in the least. All intellectual pursuits are relativistic in just these senses. Political science, psychology, chemistry, and physics are not certain, but they are not subjective either. As I see it, ethnical inquiry proceeds like this: we are taught moral principles by parents, teachers, and society at large. As we grow older we become exposed to competing views. These may lead us to reevaluate presently held beliefs. Or we may find ourselves inexplicably making certain valuations, possibly because of inherited altruistic tendencies. We may "learn the hard way" that some actions generate unacceptable consequences. Or we may reflect upon our own and others’ "theories" or patterns of behavior and decide they are inconsistent. The resulting views are "tested"; we act as we think we should and evaluate the consequences of those actions on ourselves and on others. We thereby correct our mistakes in light of the test of time.
    Of course people make different moral judgments; of course we cannot resolve these differences by using some algorithm which is itself beyond judgment. We have no vantage point outside human experience where we can judge right and wrong, good and bad. But then we don’t have a vantage point from where we can be philosophical relativists either.
    We are left within the real world, trying to cope with ourselves, with each other, with the world, and with our own fallibility. We do not have all the moral answers, nor do we have an algorithm to discern those answers, neither do we possess an algorithm for determining correct language usage but that does not make us throw up our hands in despair because we can no longer communicate.
    If we understand ethics in this way, we can see, I think, the real value of ethical theory. Some people talk as if ethical theories give us moral prescriptions. They think we should apply ethical principles as we would a poultice: after diagnosing the ailment, we apply the appropriate dressing. But that is a mistake. No theory provides a set of abstract solutions to apply straightforwardly. Ethical theories are important not because they solve all moral dilemmas but because they help us notice salient features of moral problems and help us understand those problems in context.  
What does the author mean by saying that we may learn moral principles "the hard way"?
选项 A、We reevaluate our previously held beliefs as we grow older.
B、We refute some moral principles only after we find them inconsistent.
C、We acquire a sense of right and wrong from real life lessons.
D、We act by ignoring our inherited altruistic tendencies.
答案C
解析 这是一道词义题。题干中的信号词为the hard way，出自于第三段第8句话中。文章第三段指出：长大后，我们开始接触不同的道德观，这些观念可能促使我们重新评估我们已有的信念；我们能从教训中了解到，某些行为产生了不为人接受的后果；或者，我们思考自己或其他人的“理论”或行为模式，看看它们是否一致。这说明，作者的意思是，我们从现实生活的教训中获得知识。C说“我们从现实生活的教训中获得对与错的认识”，这与作者的观点符合。重新评估我们以前持有的观念是由接触不同的道德观导致的，与作者说该句话没有关系，所以A不对；文中没有提到B；与D有关的信息是该段的第6句话，文中是说“我们发现自己在不由自主地作某些评价，可能是由于我们先天的利他主义倾向”，说明D不对。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/39K4777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)