首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-06-14
42
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
The best title for the passage is
选项
A、Utilitarianism as Moral Philosophy.
B、Utilitarians Are Not Nice People.
C、Utilitarian A Good Man?
D、Utilitarianism and Morality.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/3AOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichwordisnotusedbyNorberg-HodgetodescribetheLadakhipeople?
Gulliver’sTravelswaswrittenby______.
Cultureshockisapainfulexperiencewegothroughwhenweencountermanynewthingsinanothercountryandwe【1】______insom
WiththeadventoftheInternet,informationcanbespreadwithunprecedentedspeedandhenceitislikelythatpeoplecanmake
Ourtheoriesabouthumandiseasearetheproductofcurrentfashion【M1】______thanwewouldliketoadmit.Butjustasthe
TheProblemsofTakingEnglishCoursesThroughEnglishWhenstudentstakecoursesthroughthemediumofEnglish,theyhaveto
TheProblemsofTakingEnglishCoursesThroughEnglishWhenstudentstakecoursesthroughthemediumofEnglish,theyhaveto
Lawrence’srepresentativework______waspositivelytakenasatypicalexampleandlivelymanifestationoftheOedipusComplex
Theoilpriceswilldecreasesharplyinthelongrunmainlybecause______.
Inthe1990s,MicrosoftInternetExplorerbattledNetscapeNavigatorinthegreatWebbrowserwars.Inthe2000s,GoogleandYah
随机试题
Whensomeonehasmoney【56】hewantstoputinasageplace,he【57】takesittoabank.Untilrecentlythevery【58】ofthebankbuil
Manysuperstitiouspeopleareafraidofblackcats.Theybelievethatblackcatshaveastrangepower.Ifablackcatcrossesth
对接焊缝的宽度b=200mm,按强度设计值换算成角焊缝等效宽度为( )mm。如果腹板角焊缝的τfv和σfm分别为114.6N/mm2、108.9N/mm2,则角焊缝的应力为( )。
期货公司提供的投资方案或者期货交易策略应当以()为主要依据。
在反垄断法律体系中,一般不被认为属于垄断行为的是()。
“探索等腰三角形的性质”的教学片段:(一)创设情境,引出课题教师活动:现在农村经济条件好了,大部分家庭盖有楼房。大家知道农村的楼房都有房梁,并且这些房梁都保持水平状态,你知道木匠师傅采用什么方法来确定房梁是否保持水平吗?学生活
世界上第一个建立现代文官制度的国家是英国。()
结合材料回答问题:材料1100年前,中国大地爆发了震惊中外的五四运动,这是中国近现代史上具有划时代意义的一个重大事件。今年是五四运动100周年,也是中华人民共和国成立70周年。在这个具有特殊意义的历史时刻,我们在这里隆重集会,
Norevolutionsintechnologyhaveasvisiblymarkedthehumanconditionasthoseintransport.Movinggoodsandpeople,theyhav
A、Hewouldn’tfindagooddormitory.B、Hewouldlosecontactwithhisoldfriends.C、Hewouldfallbehindwithhisstudies.D、He
最新回复
(
0
)