首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-06-14
44
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
The best title for the passage is
选项
A、Utilitarianism as Moral Philosophy.
B、Utilitarians Are Not Nice People.
C、Utilitarian A Good Man?
D、Utilitarianism and Morality.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/3AOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Advancesinscienceandtechnologyhelpedsolvingmanyproblems.However,theyhavealsocausednewproblems.Discusssomeofth
A、TheyearwhenMr.Sunhasgraduated.B、HowMr.Sunlefthisschool.C、ThenameoftheschoolfromwhichMr.Sunhasgraduated.
Note-takingSkillsNote-takingrequiresahighlevelofabilityinmanyskills,particularlyinthefollowingfourmostimport
ThebestagriculturelandinBritainis
Tounderstandthemarketingconcept,it’sonlynecessarytounderstandthedifferencebetweenmarketingandselling.Nottooma
Thefoursounds/p/,/b/,/m/,/w/haveonefeatureincommon,i.e.theyareall
Themostflexiblespeechorganis
嫉妒是一种微妙的情感,强烈而又隐蔽,自己对自己也不愿意承认,却又时不时地表现出来。嫉妒很伤人,很降低人,使人变蠢,变得可笑,可悲,可厌。一个人越是掩饰自己的嫉妒,就越容易被别人觉察出来。嫉妒是弱者的激情,因为他除了嫉妒还是嫉妒,做不出什么能使自己感到自豪、
TheoppositionNationalTransitionalCouncilthoughtColonelGaddafiwasmostlikelyin______.
IntheUnitedKingdom,thepartywhichwinsthe______numberofseatsintheHouseofCommonsbecomestheofficialOpposition.
随机试题
人生样态
A.五味子B.续随子C.坤草子D.梭罗子E.决明子茺蔚子的别名是
在高峰强度持续时间短时,骨料生产能力根据()确定.
个人惯性
商周两代的学校教育,都是由国家来管理的,即古书中说的()。
五谷中的“菽”是指什么()
1920年4月,经共产国际批准,俄共(布)远东局派人来华帮助中国建立共产党,他是()
1982年12月4日,五届全国人大五次会议通过了《中华人民共和国宪法》。我国现行宪法即1982年宪法就是在这个历史背景下产生的。1988年、1993年、1999年、2004年,全国人大分别对我国宪法个别条款和部分内容作出必要的也是十分重要的修正,使我国宪法
SherylSandbergisafeministiconforthetechworld.【B1】______SiliconValley,veryfewpeoplewouldhave【B2】______DavidGoldbe
Readtheextractbelowfromacompanyreport.Inmostofthelines(34-45),thereisoneextraword.Itiseithergrammaticallyi
最新回复
(
0
)