首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page. •For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B,
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page. •For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B,
admin
2010-01-28
74
问题
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page.
•For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B, C or D ) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
A school of behavioral economists has long argued that when it comes to money, people are incapable of acting in their own best interest -- that decisions result from impulse and overconfidence as much as from reason. Smart folks, in other words, are just as likely to soon part with their money as all those fools.
The truly bad news is that smart companies are just as prone to make terrible decisions for the same reason. Take one of the biggest business decisions of all— merger. Research consistently shows that most mergers fail in every sense of the word, from falling stock prices to lower profitability after the merger. Yet, even with suffering capital markets, a recent Hewitt Associates study found that more than half of the 70 senior executives and board members surveyed planned to step up merger activity during the next three years.
Why? Call it executive hubris. CEOs are not different from the rest of us in that they fall prey to the self-enhancement bias: we all like to think we are intelligent and efficacious. So we overestimate our abilities. That’s why studies show that significantly more than half of all people believe they are above average -- in negotiating ability, even in income, This overly optimistic view is, of course, worse for CEOs- afar all, they generally are way above average. Btu the result is the same: bad decisions. One study, by business school professors Matthew Hayward and Donald Hambrick, showed that the greater the hubris of the chief executive, the more a company tends to overpay for acquisitions.
The aphorism "Pride goeth before a fall" seems to hold true in business too. When executives are confronted with the appalling statistics, their first response goes something like this: "That may happen to other companies, but not ours. This acquisition will be more successful. We have learned."
The next CEO challenge is persuading a possibly recalcitrant board of directors to let you pursue your urge to merge. Hubris, again, returns to center stage. You paint a picture of doom and gloom that will result if you don’t merge. Take a look at one of the rationales given for the merger of Hewlett-Packard and Compaq, two companies with poor operating track records. The argument was that PCs were becoming a commodity industry, consolidation was inevitable, and if HP didn’t do the consolidating, it would soon be one of the consolidated. Here’s another variant of the same rationale: If you don’t buy the target company, your competitor will -- and you’ll lose out. This gambit uses the influence strategy of scarcity -- we want what we can’t have, and we find particularly desirable anything that we may lose to someone else.
Here’s how to avoid hubris-fueled merger mania. First, follow the adage from medicine: Forgive and remember. Go back and evaluate past merger decisions, admit when you were wrong, figure out why, and learn from it.
Second, beware of too much agreement in the board room. When Alfred Sloan ran General Motors, if he couldn’t find opposition to a decision, he’d postpone it. He interpreted a lack of dissent as a lack of analysis. Find, even encourage, people to disagree with you, so that all sides of the decision are examined. Mostly, we like those who agree with us. But as one of my colleagues likes to point out, if two people agree all the time, one of them is redundant.
The urge to merge is still like an addiction in many companies: Doing deals is much more fun and interesting than fixing fundamental problems. So, as in dealing with any other addiction or temptation, maybe it is best to just say no.
The writer’s idea about merger is that
选项
A、it’s not easy to stop the urge to merger.
B、merger leads to increased margins.
C、CEOs have a cold response toward merger.
D、the cost of merger will outweigh any profits.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/3CKd777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
A、 B、 C、 ANo,...inahospitalanswerstheyes/noquestion.Choice(B)confusesthesimilarsoundsbarnandbor
A、 B、 C、 CBecauseusuallystatesareasonthatanswersawhyquestion.Choice(A)usesshirtbutdoesnotanswerw
A、 B、 C、 A因为是由Do开头的疑问句,所以答案就要以Yes/No开头。所以正确答案是(A)。在把article错误地理解成“物品”而不是“文章”时,容易误将(B)和(C)当做答案。
1.Practiseansweringthesequestions.PhaseOne:•Canyoutellmeaboutyourpresentjobandyourplansforthefuture?•Can
Askingquestions询问
Question询问
Askingquestions查询
Tellingyouraudiencethattheycanaskquestions请听众提问
随机试题
下列各种债券中,其利率在偿付期限内发生变化的是()。
教育心理学中行动研究法的研究目的是()
5-羟色胺再摄取抑制药治疗抑郁症时,起效时间是开始服药后
在总监理工程师负责制的原则中,总监理工程师是建设工程监理的()主体。
下列关于构造应力场的说法中正确的是()。
某外贸公司按CIF术语出口坯布1000包,根据合同规定投保水渍险。货在途中因船舱内淡水管道滴漏,致使该批坯布中的200包遭水渍,保险公司应对此负责赔偿。()
与下述ER图等价的UML类图是()。
下列关于内联函数的叙述中,正确的是
ACountry’sStandardofLivingThe"standardofliving"ofanycountrymeanstheaverageperson’sshareofthegoodsandservice
DearSirs,WearetoldthatyouarethelargestimporterofclothesinthestateofCalifornia,U.S.A.andareinterested
最新回复
(
0
)