首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page. •For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B,
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page. •For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B,
admin
2010-01-28
89
问题
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page.
•For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B, C or D ) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
A school of behavioral economists has long argued that when it comes to money, people are incapable of acting in their own best interest -- that decisions result from impulse and overconfidence as much as from reason. Smart folks, in other words, are just as likely to soon part with their money as all those fools.
The truly bad news is that smart companies are just as prone to make terrible decisions for the same reason. Take one of the biggest business decisions of all— merger. Research consistently shows that most mergers fail in every sense of the word, from falling stock prices to lower profitability after the merger. Yet, even with suffering capital markets, a recent Hewitt Associates study found that more than half of the 70 senior executives and board members surveyed planned to step up merger activity during the next three years.
Why? Call it executive hubris. CEOs are not different from the rest of us in that they fall prey to the self-enhancement bias: we all like to think we are intelligent and efficacious. So we overestimate our abilities. That’s why studies show that significantly more than half of all people believe they are above average -- in negotiating ability, even in income, This overly optimistic view is, of course, worse for CEOs- afar all, they generally are way above average. Btu the result is the same: bad decisions. One study, by business school professors Matthew Hayward and Donald Hambrick, showed that the greater the hubris of the chief executive, the more a company tends to overpay for acquisitions.
The aphorism "Pride goeth before a fall" seems to hold true in business too. When executives are confronted with the appalling statistics, their first response goes something like this: "That may happen to other companies, but not ours. This acquisition will be more successful. We have learned."
The next CEO challenge is persuading a possibly recalcitrant board of directors to let you pursue your urge to merge. Hubris, again, returns to center stage. You paint a picture of doom and gloom that will result if you don’t merge. Take a look at one of the rationales given for the merger of Hewlett-Packard and Compaq, two companies with poor operating track records. The argument was that PCs were becoming a commodity industry, consolidation was inevitable, and if HP didn’t do the consolidating, it would soon be one of the consolidated. Here’s another variant of the same rationale: If you don’t buy the target company, your competitor will -- and you’ll lose out. This gambit uses the influence strategy of scarcity -- we want what we can’t have, and we find particularly desirable anything that we may lose to someone else.
Here’s how to avoid hubris-fueled merger mania. First, follow the adage from medicine: Forgive and remember. Go back and evaluate past merger decisions, admit when you were wrong, figure out why, and learn from it.
Second, beware of too much agreement in the board room. When Alfred Sloan ran General Motors, if he couldn’t find opposition to a decision, he’d postpone it. He interpreted a lack of dissent as a lack of analysis. Find, even encourage, people to disagree with you, so that all sides of the decision are examined. Mostly, we like those who agree with us. But as one of my colleagues likes to point out, if two people agree all the time, one of them is redundant.
The urge to merge is still like an addiction in many companies: Doing deals is much more fun and interesting than fixing fundamental problems. So, as in dealing with any other addiction or temptation, maybe it is best to just say no.
The writer’s idea about merger is that
选项
A、it’s not easy to stop the urge to merger.
B、merger leads to increased margins.
C、CEOs have a cold response toward merger.
D、the cost of merger will outweigh any profits.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/3CKd777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
A、 B、 C、 CHe’stoobusyisapoliteresponsetotherequest.Choice(A)answerswhichtypeoflettersdoyoupre
A、 B、 C、 AYes,yourwifecalledanswerstheyes/noquestiondoIhaveanymessages.Choice(B)confusesthesim
A、 B、 C、 ANo,...inahospitalanswerstheyes/noquestion.Choice(B)confusesthesimilarsoundsbarnandbor
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.(Thecandidatechoosesonetop
1.Practiseansweringthesequestions.PhaseOne:•Canyoutellmeaboutyourpresentjobandyourplansforthefuture?•Can
Askingquestions询问
Question询问
Askingquestions征询
随机试题
()是流动的流体与固体壁面直接接触,当两者温度不同时,互相间所发生的热量传递过程。
简述公共政策终结的含义及原因。
影响伤口愈合的局部因素不包括
治疗心虚胆怯型失眠,选方宜治疗心肾不交,虚火上扰型失眠,选方宜
背景资料:某小型水电站工程,主体工程采用现浇钢筋混凝土结构,基础为管桩基础。建设单位与施工总承包单位签订了施工总承包合同,合同工期为29个月。按合同约定,施工总承包单位将预应力管桩工程分包给了符合资质要求的专业分包单位。施工总承包单位提交的施工总进度计划
下列属于款项的是()。
下列各项属于邮资凭证的有()。
中央银行在运用货币政策进行金融宏观调控时,主要是通过调控( )来影响社会经济生活的。
某投资项目的投资额10000元,当年投资当年获益。各年年末的现金净流量如下表所示:要求:在最低投资效益率为8%的条件下,确定投资是否可行?
A、 B、 C、 D、 A第三个图形的外部图形是第一个图形的内部图形,其内部图形是第二个图形的外部图形,据此选A。
最新回复
(
0
)