首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example,
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example,
admin
2022-04-28
46
问题
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example, the wealthy oil enclave of Abu Dhabi brags that it has planted more than 130 million trees—each of which does its duty in absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, this artificial forest in the desert also consumes huge quantities of irrigation water produced, or recycled, from expensive desalination plants. The trees may allow its leaders to wear a halo at international meetings, but the rude fact is that they are an energy-intensive beauty strip, like most of so-called green capitalism. And, while we’re at it, let’s just ask: What if the buying and selling of carbon credits and pollution offsets fails to reduce global warming? What exactly will motivate governments and global industries then to join hands in a crusade to reduce emissions through regulation and taxation?
Kyoto-type climate diplomacy assumes that all the major actors will recognize an overriding common interest in gaining harness over the
runaway
greenhouse effect. But global warming is not War of the Worlds, where invading Martians are dedicated to annihilating all of humanity without distinction. Climate change, instead, will initially produce dramatically unequal impacts across regions and social classes. It will reinforce, not diminish, geopolitical inequality and conflict.
As the UNDP emphasized in its report last year, global warming is above all a threat to the poor and the unborn, the "two parties with little or no political voice". Coordinated global action on their behalf thus presupposes either their revolutionary empowerment or the transformation of the self-interest of rich countries and classes into an enlightened "solidarity" without precedent in history. From a rational perspective, the latter outcome only seems realistic if it can be shown that privileged groups possess no preferential "exit" option, that internationalist public opinion drives policymaking in key countries, and that greenhouse gas reduction could be achieved without major sacrifices in upscale Northern Hemispheric standards of living—none of which seems highly likely.
And what if growing environmental and social turbulence, instead of stimulating heroic innovation and international cooperation, simply drives elite publics into even more frenzied attempts to wall themselves off from the rest of humanity? Global intervention, in this unexplored but not improbable scenario, would be silently abandoned (as, to some extent, it already has been) in favor of accelerated investment in selective adaptation for Earth’s first-class passengers. We’re talking here of the prospect of creating green and gated oases of permanent affluence on an otherwise stricken planet.
Of course, there will still be treaties, carbon credits, famine relief, humanitarian acrobatics, and perhaps, the full-scale conversion of some European cities and small countries to alternative energy. But the shift to low-, or zero-emission lifestyles would be almost unimaginably expensive. And this will certainly become even more unimaginable after perhaps 2030, when the combined impacts of climate change, peak oil, peak water, and an additional 1.5 billion people on the planet may begin to seriously threaten growth.
What is the author’s attitude towards the shift to low-emission lifestyles?
选项
A、Doubtful.
B、Supportive.
C、Ambiguous.
D、Encouraging.
答案
A
解析
态度题。题目问的是“作者对转向‘低排放’的生活方式持什么态度?”。由文章最后一段第二、三句“…the shift to low-emission lifestyles would be almost unimaginably expensive. And this will certainly become even more unimaginable after perhaps 2030…”可知:这种转变代价很高,而且在2030年后可能会变的更难。由此可以推断作者对转向“低排放”的生活方式持怀疑态度。故选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/3KWd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Doyouhaveapersonalcomputer?Doyouthinkitiswisetobuyapersonalcomputer?Writeanessayonthistopic.Youshouldus
WorldleadersmetrecentlyatUnitedNationsheadquartersinNewYorkCitytodiscusstheenvironmentalissuesraisedattheR
Cultureisaparadoxicalcommodity.Socompletelyisitsubjecttothelawofexchangethatitisnolongerexchanged;itiss
ThelifeofAlbertEinsteinisamodelinmanyways(31)bothnaturalandpoliticalscientists.Firstofall,healwaysempl
______theclimateaffectsthefuturesustainableagriculturaldevelopment?______thedegradationofenvironmentcausesthechan
Thepassageismainlyabout______.Accordingtothepassage,whatistherelationshipbetweenbloodtestingandkeepinghealth
What’sthebasicdifferencebetweenEnglishfootballandAmericanfootball?
WorldleadersmetrecentlyatUnitedNationsheadquartersinNewYorkCitytodiscusstheenvironmentalissuesraisedattheRio
English/(British)
PaoloFril,chairmanandscientificofficerofGeneDupe,basedinSanMelito,California,isamanwithadream.Thedreamisa
随机试题
在呼吸链中,既可作为NADH脱氢酶的受氢体,又可作为琥珀酸脱氢酶的受氢体的是
8个月男婴,发育迟缓,近半个月来反复出现屈颈弯腰,每次持续数秒,每天发作数次,睡前睡后发作频繁。该患者最可能的诊断是
急性心肌梗死患者,疑有早期心源性休克末梢循环改变,血压90/70mmHg,尿比重1.016,中心静脉压13mmH2O。治疗时应首选
国家鼓励发展下列通用节能技术中的()。
根据《安全生产许可证条例》的规定,安全生产许可证的有效期为()年。
空间数据对事物最基本的表示方法是()。
每套住宅至少应有()个居住空间能获得冬季日照。
某煤矿企业(增值税一般纳税人)2019年4月将境内开采的2吨原煤用于生产居民用煤炭制品,当月销售居民用煤炭制品取得不含税销售收入18万元,已知该批原煤的生产成本为15万元,当地税务机关确定的成本利润率为10%、资源税税率为6%。则煤矿企业应缴纳资源税和增值
图像文件的种类很多,例如JPG文件、BMP文件、GIF文件、TIFF文件、PNG文件等。目前,在Web网页中应用广泛,提供了数据压缩功能和图像累进显示功能,且可将多幅图画保存在一个文件中的图像文件,其类型(文件扩展名)是______。
Whichparagraphcontainsthefollowinginformation?Writethecorrectletter,A-l,inboxes17-21onyouranswersheet.NBYou
最新回复
(
0
)