2. 外语
  3. In a certain municipality, a judge overturned a suspect’ s conviction for possession of an illegal weapon. The suspect had fled

In a certain municipality, a judge overturned a suspect’ s conviction for possession of an illegal weapon. The suspect had fled

admin2014-10-21  53
问题 In a certain municipality, a judge overturned a suspect’ s conviction for possession of an illegal weapon. The suspect had fled upon seeing police and subsequently discarded the illegal weapon after the police gave chase. The judge reasoned as follows: the only cause for the police giving chase was the suspect’s flight: by itself, flight from the police does not create a reasonable suspicion of a criminal act; evidence collected during an illegal chase is inadmissible; therefore, the evidence in this case was inadmissible.
Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the judge’ s decision that the evidence was inadmissible?
选项 A、Flight from the police could create a reasonable suspicion of a criminal act as long as other significant factors are involved.
B、People can legally flee from the police only when those people are not involved in a criminal act at the time.
C、Police can legally give chase to a person only when the person’ s actions have created a reasonable suspicion of a criminal act.
D、Flight from the police should not itself be considered a criminal act.
E、In all cases in which a person’ s actions have created a reasonable suspicion of a criminal act, police can legally give chase to that person.
答案C
解析 警察在没有合情合理的理由的情况下，对嫌疑犯进行非法追击，结果得到的证据不能被使用。因此要想对嫌疑犯进行合法的追击，警察就必须得有合情合理的理由，因此(C)为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/3OtO777K
本试题收录于： GMAT VERBAL题库GMAT分类
0

GMAT VERBAL

GMAT

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)