首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Sir Howard Davies, the man with the job of deciding whether Britain needs a new airport, must be looking with some alarm at the
Sir Howard Davies, the man with the job of deciding whether Britain needs a new airport, must be looking with some alarm at the
admin
2015-06-14
41
问题
Sir Howard Davies, the man with the job of deciding whether Britain needs a new airport, must be looking with some alarm at the precedents. In 1971, after more than 18 months of work, the Roskill commission recommended that a four-runway airport to serve London be built at Cublington, near Aylesbury.
When Michael Noble, then minister for trade, opened the debate on the commission’s findings in the Commons, he said of its authors: " I hope that they may draw some comfort from one of my hon friends who said that the fact that he totally rejected their conclusion did not in any way diminish his admiration for the way in which they had done their work and presented their report. "
Their plan, of course, never got off the drawing board.
Committing the Conservatives to blocking a third runway at Heathrow was a key plank of David Cameron’s strategy to detoxify the Tory brand and prove that he would put polar bears before sharp-suited businessmen. It was also built on political expediency—he needed to win Conservative seats in the area. Further, it was a recognition that the building of a third runway would hurt Britain’s then leading role in reducing global carbon emissions.
But with the economy trapped in a deep malaise Cameron is having a rethink. There is a strong lobby that suggests that UK needs extra airport capacity in order to boost future economic prospects. Also, the UK is on track to meet its Kyoto targets, albeit partly because of economic weakness. There is, too, an argument that the tax system may be a better way of reducing the number of unnecessary flights than a ban on building new runways. Flight travel is simply too cheap compared with rail fares—this is the fault of a tax system that gives an advantage to airlines.
George Osborne now firmly believes that if the UK really wants to build an economy that can properly connect with the rest of the world it needs more airport capacity. But the economic case is being driven largely by self-interested parties, not least British Airways, the British Airports Authority and the bodies that represent them.
It will be a crucial part of the Davies commission to identify the economic benefits a new airport or runway would deliver. Multinational companies make inward investment decisions on the basis of a whole range of factors, including the skills of the workforce, the strength of the currency and the generosity of state support for industry. Whether the chief executive can jet in direct from Chicago or Shanghai may be a marginal consideration.
However, those advocating the development of a hub airport may have a case. If Britain allows its one airport that comes close to being an international hub to become ever more clogged up while Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Madrid and Paris become transit points for Europeans, including enterprising Brits, wanting to get to the fast-growing economies of China, India or Brazil, there is a risk that economic opportunities will be missed, ambitions stunted, jobs lost.
However, if any British government is to press the case for extra airport capacity, it needs to make a convincing case for continuing to meet its ambitious carbon emissions target. As this paper said in 2008: "It will require a radical programme of wave and wind turbine construction, nuclear industry expansion and the building of underground vaults to store the carbon dioxide that currently pours from the nation’s coal, oil and gas power plants."
Unfortunately, there is absolutely no evidence that this government’s energy policy is fit for that purpose. Indeed, as we state elsewhere in these pages, the government’s desire to pursue a dash for gas as a future energy strategy is precisely the wrong direction of travel.
Even if the case for a hub airport is established, Heathrow is not the only answer: Heathrow already creates all-but-unbearable noise, pollution and disruption for unlucky residents, and its transport links are groaning. Of those affected by noise pollution in Europe, 30% live in and around Heathrow. Is it really sensible to build more airline capacity in the middle of a major population centre?
There is a plausible case that bringing in as many planes as possible—the proposed estuary airport-over sea instead of hundreds of thousands of rooftops makes more sense. As importantly, a giant new airport would provide a powerful economic boost for an area where unemployment is high. Although characterised, until now, as a Boris Johnson vanity project, there is support from politicians of all persuasions to the east of London to try and create a hub)—in all senses—which would address the historical inequalities and poverty to the east of the capital.
There is no easy solution. Davies will need wisdom and a good dose of political nous to weigh up the issues—the financial and environmental costs and any economic advantages. He should use his authority to seize the initiative and insist that the question of airport capacity in the UK be settled sooner rather than later. Otherwise, the likelihood of a repeat of the Roskill commission is all too likely.
Which of the following statements best describes David Cameron?
选项
A、Blocking to build a third runway is one of his strategies to help the Tory brand.
B、He proved that he could put polar bears before sharp-suited businessmen.
C、Building a new airport helped him win the seats in the Conservative party.
D、He realized Britain’s then leading role in reducing global carbon emissions.
答案
A
解析
细节题。由第四段首句“Committing the Conservatives to blocking a third runway at Heathrow was akey plank of David Cameron’s strategy to detoxify the Tory brand”可知,阻碍在希思罗新建第三条跑道是卡梅隆当时想解救保守党的一条政策,故选[A]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/3yOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisNOTcorrect?
JobstresshasbecomeacommonandcostlyproblemintheAmericanworkplace,leavingfewworkersuntouched.Ⅰ.Generalintrod
A、hatedcomputersB、onlyhadsomebasicknowledgeofcomputersC、wasacomputergeekD、wasteachingmathsandwritingA被访者提到从前曾
IntroductiontotheSportsStudiesDepartmentThismini-lecturegivenbytheSportsStudiesDepartmentontheUniversity’sOpen
Itcanbetemptingtohidefromthepeople,placesandtaskswhichmakelifestressful.Byremovingyoufromthesituation,it’s
Itcanbetemptingtohidefromthepeople,placesandtaskswhichmakelifestressful.Byremovingyoufromthesituation,it’s
Whatwillbetheimpactofaglobalcomputernetworkonculturalforms?Theconstructionofexclusiveinformationsocietieshas
Thebasicdistinctionbetweenachievementandproficiencytestsistobefoundinthedifferentpurposesforwhichthetwokinds
BarackObamainvitedapuzzlinggroupofpeopleintotheWhiteHouse:universitypresidents.Whatshouldonemakeofthesestran
ThetwoclimbersdiedinPeruwhenthey______.
随机试题
连翘的归经是
DNA重组过程中所使用的酶类统称为工具酶,限制性核酸内切酶(限制酶),是一类能识别双链DNA分子中某种特定核苷酸序列,并由此切割DNA双链结构的核酸酶,下列有关限制酶的叙述,除哪个外,都是正确的
项目目标可分解为工期目标、成本目标和()。
劳动者在试用期内单方解除劳动合同,应提前()日通知用人单位。
下列各项中,()不属于产品整体范畴。
某客户计划申购某只新股,若每股发行价格为13己,则该客户证券账户中至少需要有()元用来申购(不考虑税费)。
公共外交是政府外交的重要补充,其基础是普通公众,目的在于改善外国公众对本国的态度,影响外国政府对本国的政策。日前,我国每年出境游8000万人次以上,普通游客的言行可以带来公共外交的效果,如举止有度、谈吐得体有正面效果,大声喧哗、不守秩序有负面影响。由此可见
奥林匹克运动发展到今天这样的规模,其意义大大超出竞技体育的______。正是因为有众多国家、地区运动员的参加,才推动了奥林匹克运动自身的______和壮大,而且通过各国运动员的友谊和交往,对全世界的和平以及全人类的进步事业作出了难能可贵的贡献。填入
2011年,全国研究与试验发展(R&D)经费支出8687亿元,比2002年增长5.7倍,占国内生产总值的比重由1.07%上升到1.84%。2011年,研究与试验发展人员全时当量288.3万人年,比2002年增长1.8倍。技术市场成交额4764亿元,
Perhapsmorethananythingelse,scientistsareeagertofindoutifMartianlifeexistedinthepast—orstillexists.【C1】______
最新回复
(
0
)