首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example,
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example,
admin
2019-08-17
101
问题
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example, the wealthy oil enclave of Abu Dhabi brags that it has planted more than 130 million trees—each of which does its duty in absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, this artificial forest in the desert also consumes huge quantities of irrigation water produced, or recycled, from expensive desalination plants. The trees may allow its leaders to wear a halo at international meetings, but the rude fact is that they are an energy-intensive beauty strip, like most of so-called green capitalism. And, while we’re at it, let’s just ask: What if the buying and selling of carbon credits and pollution offsets fails to reduce global warming? What exactly will motivate governments and global industries then to join hands in a crusade to reduce emissions through regulation and taxation?
Kyoto-type climate diplomacy assumes that all the major actors will recognize an overriding common interest in gaining harness over the runaway greenhouse effect. But global warming is not War of the Worlds, where invading Martians are dedicated to annihilating all of humanity without distinction. Climate change, instead, will initially produce dramatically unequal impacts across regions and social classes. It will reinforce, not diminish, geopolitical inequality and conflict.
As the UNDP emphasized in its report last year, global warming is above all a threat to the poor and the unborn, the "two parties with little or no political voice". Coordinated global action on their behalf thus presupposes either their revolutionary empowerment or the transformation of the self-interest of rich countries and classes into an enlightened "solidarity" without precedent in history. From a rational perspective, the latter outcome only seems realistic if it can be shown that privileged groups possess no preferential "exit" option, that internationalist public opinion drives policymaking in key countries, and that greenhouse gas reduction could be achieved without major sacrifices in upscale Northern Hemispheric standards of living—none of which seems highly likely.
And what if growing environmental and social turbulence, instead of stimulating heroic innovation and international cooperation, simply drives elite publics into even more frenzied attempts to wall themselves off from the rest of humanity? Global intervention, in this unexplored but not improbable scenario, would be silently abandoned(as, to some extent, it already has been)in favor of accelerated investment in selective adaptation for Earth’s first-class passengers. We’re talking here of the prospect of creating green and gated oases of permanent affluence on an otherwise stricken planet.
Of course, there will still be treaties, carbon credits, famine relief, humanitarian acrobatics, and perhaps, the full-scale conversion of some European cities and small countries to alternative energy. But the shift to low-, or zero-emission lifestyles would be almost unimaginably expensive. And this will certainly become even more unimaginable after perhaps 2030, when the combined impacts of climate change, peak oil, peak water, and an additional 1. 5 billion people on the planet may begin to seriously threaten growth.
According to the author, which of the following statements is true?
选项
A、International cooperation can help curb environmental and social crisis.
B、Innovation and cooperation in environmental issues are unlikely to happen.
C、Rich countries will possibly seclude themselves from the rest of the world.
D、Investment in environmental conservation will largely increase in selected areas.
答案
C
解析
推断题。题目问的是“根据作者,下面哪一句说法是正确的?”。由文章第四段第一句“And what if growing environmentaland social turbulence,instead of stimulating heroic innovation andinternational cooperation,simply drives elite publics into even morefrenzied attempts to wall themselves off from the rest of humanity?”可知:革新与合作有利于环境保护,这与A和B项内容相悖。此外,通过该句还可知:“elite publics”有可能进一步将其与其他人类社会隔离,这与C项内容相符。再由第四段第二句“Global in—tervention,…would be silently abandoned in favor of accelerated in—vestment in selective adaptation for Earth’s first—class passengers.”可知:如果不提倡国际干预,投资就会加速流向发达国家,这与D项内容不符。故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/3yWd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
ChrisBoningtonhasclimbedMountEverestatleasttwicesofar.
Themid-19thcenturytimetravelerswouldnotbesurprisedbytoday’sInternetbecause______Thethemeofthepassageis:_____
Itcanbeinferredthatthefootballgamewasplayedin______onthatSundayafternoon.______isthemostpopulargameinAmeric
Inthefirstparagraph,theauthorquotesStraussmann’swordsinordertomakeclear______.TheGTE’sexampleshowsthat______.
ThecampaignstagedbybothBMWandRenaultaretopromoteBMW’scampaignhasmistakenlyconveyedtheideaof
Theauthorholdsthatengineeringandhumanitieshavetheleastincommon.Theotherstudentsdidn’tunderstandthelanguageof
WhenwastheorganizationofRedCrossestablished?
Navigationcomputers,nowsoldbymostcar-makers,cost$2,000andup.Nosurprise,then,thattheyaremostoftenfoundinluxu
随机试题
钱某驾驶大型卧铺客车,乘载45人(核载40人),保持40公里/小时以上的车速行至八宿县境内连续下坡急转弯路段处,翻下100米深的山崖,造成17人死亡、20人受伤。钱某的主要违法行为是什么?
论述受众理论的个人差异论、社会分类论和社会关系论各自的观点。
某市某区人民政府决定将区建材工业局管理的国有小砖厂出售。小砖厂的承包人以侵犯其经营自主权为由提出行政复议申请,本案的行政复议机关应当是()。
反射v.r______
尤善行大肠气滞,为治湿热泄痢里急后重之要药的是
男性,25岁,因口腔颌面部创伤致舌体裂伤,出血明显,口底肿胀,来院就诊,最佳的止血方法是()
某9层疗养院排水系统采用污废水分流制,管材为排水铸铁管。立管每层设洗脸盆、自闭式冲洗阀大便器和浴盆各2个。采用专用通气立管,与生活污水和生活废水两根立管连接,则其通气立管管径为()mm。
公民李某为无民事行为能力人,其法定代理人张某于2007年1月10日知道李某的权利受到侵害,但由于工作繁忙一直未对侵权人贾某提起诉讼。2007年7月10日,张某因车祸死亡,直到2007年12月10日才由有关机关为李某指定新的代理人赵某。已知该项诉讼时效期间为
由于主观原因造成漏接的处理方法()
我国民族政策的基本原则是()。
最新回复
(
0
)