首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
As the wealthiest nation in history debates whether we’re interested in paying our bills, it’s time to unmask the true cause of
As the wealthiest nation in history debates whether we’re interested in paying our bills, it’s time to unmask the true cause of
admin
2015-01-10
88
问题
As the wealthiest nation in history debates whether we’re interested in paying our bills, it’s time to unmask the true cause of our dysfunction; Neither Republicans nor Democrats are ultimately to blame. Instead, the problem lies at the antiquated core of the world’s oldest, creakiest democracy. More specifically, we must abolish that most heinous of institutions, the Electoral College. I’m not sure I’ve ever met anyone with a kind word to say about the College, a seemingly vestigial group that meets every four years to formally elect the president we all already voted for. Other countries with well-functioning governments have similar mysterious organs in place(call them the tonsils of democracy), but with a crucial difference: We’re the only nation on Earth to continue electing an executive president, as opposed to a figurehead, in this fashion.
Why is this such a problem? I present you with Exhibit A: whatever’s currently on the front page of today’s Tribune; Exhibit B: yesterday’s front page; Exhibit C: tomorrow’s; etc, etc. The slow-motion brain-flatulence of a government shutdown is a perfect example of the problems inherent to divided government, where two co-equal branches are pitted against one another, run by opposing leaders with no incentive to compromise. This paralysis is an inevitable outcome of a system dominated by two ideologically distinct parties, elected separately to three institutions meant to check and balance each other.
And yet, a simple tweak could dramatically decrease the odds of this division reoccurring, without requiring any major changes to our Constitution. Merely replacing the members of the Electoral College with the House of Representatives would ensure that, at least half the time, the president and the House were in alignment—and if we reformed the redistricting process to ensure truly democratic congressional elections, our government would function even more smoothly.
In this scenario, every four years, voters would elect congresspeople who would then elect a president, similar to how parliamentary systems choose a prime minister. In those elections, congressional races would function as a proxy for the presidential race—as they largely do already. Congressional elections have become nationalized, as most candidates align themselves with their party’s presidential nominee and run on national issues like the budget, gun control and health care, so this would be no great change.
There would still be a chance for gridlock, of course—for one thing, the Senate is left entirely out of this equation. In off-year elections, it’s possible that the president’s party would lose a majority in the House, ensuring the same divided government we have today. But such division would be guaranteed to end after two years, a fact that would dramatically alter the incentives for congressional leaders.
It’s certainly true that this alone isn’t a very dramatic reform, and that as long as we’re talking about constitutional amendments, why not go all-out and adopt a parliamentary system like most well-functioning Western governments? That might be a great idea, and political scientists have long noted that presidential systems have a pretty terrible track record, with America being the sole exception to an otherwise unbroken string of failures. But it just doesn’t seem politically possible to attempt such a wholesale revamp of our governance structure, particularly since the mere ratification of a constitutional amendment hasn’t happened in 21 years.
There is one objection to this idea that I take very seriously, however. Do we really feel comfortable putting the election of the president in the hands of America’ s most despised political institution, the House of Representatives? As currently constructed, of course not. For one thing, in 2012, Democrats won more than 1. 7 million more votes than Republicans in the House, and yet Republicans retained a 17-seat majority. That imbalance is antithetical to any democratic ideal, and it has to be fixed, whether or not we also allow the House to elect the president.
The solution that strikes me as the most reasonable is to inaugurate a national, nonpartisan redistricting agency, modeled on the one in place and working well in Iowa. That agency uses impartial software to automatically generate district lines that disregard all factors except population, boundaries then subject to approval by the legislature and governor. In Illinois, by contrast, a bipartisan committee draws those lines and, if the four Republicans and four Democrats on the committee can’t agree on a map, a ninth member is chosen by drawing a name from a replica of Abraham Lincoln’s hat. I wish I was kidding about that last bit. If our government is so badly broken that it all comes down to an idea seemingly stolen from a Harry Potter novel, is it any surprise that it can’t do its job?
What is the Electoral College? What is its basic function?
选项
答案
an organization/institution/organ in the American president election system/which meets every four years to formally elect the president/in the author’s eye, this organ to elect "the president we all already voted for"/the implied meaning is such a kind of organ is not well-functioning / more or less redundant/with the chosen government system consisting of two parties holding distinct ideologies and fighting against each other/
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/4DSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
IftheyspendsometimeonChinesehistory,theywillbemoreabletopredictChina’sfuture.
Wereitnotforthemeasurestimelytakenlastyearbythecentralgovernment,thesebankscouldhavebeenclosed.
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
Amanwhopubliclysayssomethingdefamatoryaboutsomeoneisrefferedtoasadrover,weshouldbecarefulaboutthissortofm
ThehappiestpeopleintheworldmayliveinScandinavia,anewstudysuggests.That’saccordingtotheUnitedNationsGeneralA
Earthobservationsshouldprovide"valueadded"applicationsfromexistingenvironmentalservices,propertytitleholdersandpr
Professionalsinvolvinginsuchdevelopmentshouldhaveauniquesenseofinnovation,theabilitytoassimilatenewinformation,
Thechildrenshouldsay"thankyou"toyouwhenyougavethemgifts.
Severalinternationaleventsintheearly1990sseemlikelyto________oratleastweakenthetrendsthatemergedinthe1980s.
随机试题
自力式调压阀的挡板下移,离开喷嘴,喷嘴喷出的气量()。
下列句中,“舆“作介词,介绍动作行为的服务对象的一句是【】
在人类社会发展中起决定作用的是()
结核病的原发综合征典型的X线胸片表现是
下列物质使溴水褪色的是()。
2005年6月,甲公司将一台价值900万元的机床委托乙仓库保管,双方签订的保管合同约定;保管期限从6月21日至10月20日,保管费用在保管期提取机床时一次付清。8月,甲公司急需向丙公司购进一批原材料,因资金紧张,暂时无法付款。经丙公司同意,甲公司以
教学设计/Teachingplan(20分)请设计一个教案,达到以下目的:1.能够听、说、读、写单词:seed,soil,sprout,plant;2.能够运用句型“First,wehavetheseed”等简单描述植物种植的过程;3.培养
抱负水平
可用于编写独立程序和快速脚本的语言是()。
打印机是一种常用的输出设备,除了有些高速激光印字机使用SCSI接口与PC机相连以外,打印机一般都使用并行接口与PC机相连,但近年来使用______接口的情况越来越多。
最新回复
(
0
)