首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
As the wealthiest nation in history debates whether we’re interested in paying our bills, it’s time to unmask the true cause of
As the wealthiest nation in history debates whether we’re interested in paying our bills, it’s time to unmask the true cause of
admin
2015-01-10
107
问题
As the wealthiest nation in history debates whether we’re interested in paying our bills, it’s time to unmask the true cause of our dysfunction; Neither Republicans nor Democrats are ultimately to blame. Instead, the problem lies at the antiquated core of the world’s oldest, creakiest democracy. More specifically, we must abolish that most heinous of institutions, the Electoral College. I’m not sure I’ve ever met anyone with a kind word to say about the College, a seemingly vestigial group that meets every four years to formally elect the president we all already voted for. Other countries with well-functioning governments have similar mysterious organs in place(call them the tonsils of democracy), but with a crucial difference: We’re the only nation on Earth to continue electing an executive president, as opposed to a figurehead, in this fashion.
Why is this such a problem? I present you with Exhibit A: whatever’s currently on the front page of today’s Tribune; Exhibit B: yesterday’s front page; Exhibit C: tomorrow’s; etc, etc. The slow-motion brain-flatulence of a government shutdown is a perfect example of the problems inherent to divided government, where two co-equal branches are pitted against one another, run by opposing leaders with no incentive to compromise. This paralysis is an inevitable outcome of a system dominated by two ideologically distinct parties, elected separately to three institutions meant to check and balance each other.
And yet, a simple tweak could dramatically decrease the odds of this division reoccurring, without requiring any major changes to our Constitution. Merely replacing the members of the Electoral College with the House of Representatives would ensure that, at least half the time, the president and the House were in alignment—and if we reformed the redistricting process to ensure truly democratic congressional elections, our government would function even more smoothly.
In this scenario, every four years, voters would elect congresspeople who would then elect a president, similar to how parliamentary systems choose a prime minister. In those elections, congressional races would function as a proxy for the presidential race—as they largely do already. Congressional elections have become nationalized, as most candidates align themselves with their party’s presidential nominee and run on national issues like the budget, gun control and health care, so this would be no great change.
There would still be a chance for gridlock, of course—for one thing, the Senate is left entirely out of this equation. In off-year elections, it’s possible that the president’s party would lose a majority in the House, ensuring the same divided government we have today. But such division would be guaranteed to end after two years, a fact that would dramatically alter the incentives for congressional leaders.
It’s certainly true that this alone isn’t a very dramatic reform, and that as long as we’re talking about constitutional amendments, why not go all-out and adopt a parliamentary system like most well-functioning Western governments? That might be a great idea, and political scientists have long noted that presidential systems have a pretty terrible track record, with America being the sole exception to an otherwise unbroken string of failures. But it just doesn’t seem politically possible to attempt such a wholesale revamp of our governance structure, particularly since the mere ratification of a constitutional amendment hasn’t happened in 21 years.
There is one objection to this idea that I take very seriously, however. Do we really feel comfortable putting the election of the president in the hands of America’ s most despised political institution, the House of Representatives? As currently constructed, of course not. For one thing, in 2012, Democrats won more than 1. 7 million more votes than Republicans in the House, and yet Republicans retained a 17-seat majority. That imbalance is antithetical to any democratic ideal, and it has to be fixed, whether or not we also allow the House to elect the president.
The solution that strikes me as the most reasonable is to inaugurate a national, nonpartisan redistricting agency, modeled on the one in place and working well in Iowa. That agency uses impartial software to automatically generate district lines that disregard all factors except population, boundaries then subject to approval by the legislature and governor. In Illinois, by contrast, a bipartisan committee draws those lines and, if the four Republicans and four Democrats on the committee can’t agree on a map, a ninth member is chosen by drawing a name from a replica of Abraham Lincoln’s hat. I wish I was kidding about that last bit. If our government is so badly broken that it all comes down to an idea seemingly stolen from a Harry Potter novel, is it any surprise that it can’t do its job?
What is the Electoral College? What is its basic function?
选项
答案
an organization/institution/organ in the American president election system/which meets every four years to formally elect the president/in the author’s eye, this organ to elect "the president we all already voted for"/the implied meaning is such a kind of organ is not well-functioning / more or less redundant/with the chosen government system consisting of two parties holding distinct ideologies and fighting against each other/
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/4DSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Throughreceivingfinancialsupportfromfamily,communityorthegovernment,isallowed,itisneveradmired.
Theengineersaregoingthroughwiththeirhighwayproject,inspitethattheexpenseshaverisen.
His________behaviormadeeveryonenervous.Hewasalwaysrushingtoopendoorsandperformothersmalltasks,apologizingunnece
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
Amanwhopubliclysayssomethingdefamatoryaboutsomeoneisrefferedtoasadrover,weshouldbecarefulaboutthissortofm
Whenonehasgoodhealth,________shouldfeelfortunate.
Thechildrenshouldsay"thankyou"toyouwhenyougavethemgifts.
随机试题
导致解释学“本体论转折”的是()
哮证发作期的主要病因病机是
患者,男,17岁。因左下肢疼痛2个月入院,查体:左小腿中段局部肿胀,组织增厚较硬,有压痛,局部皮温稍高。体温38.2℃,实验室检查:WBC:13.8×1012/L,N:78%;X线平片见下图。急性骨髓炎与尤因肉瘤有哪些主要的鉴别点
神经-肌肉接头处的化学递质是
WWW网是()的简称。
危险废物的特性不包括()。
2013年8月1日甲公司对外提供一项为期8个月的安装劳务,合同总收入580万元。2013年共发生劳务成本230万元,但无法可靠地估计该项劳务交易结果。若预计已发生的劳务成本能得到补偿的金额为150万元,则甲公司2013年度因该项业务应确认的收入为(
根据以下资料.回答问题。2000年、2005年、2006年发达国家、发展中国家和世界总体的国际储备(不包括黄金)和黄金储备变化情况,如图所示:2000年到2006年印度国际储备量的平均增长速度低于()。
Iwouldliketocallyouatthreethisafternoon,______?
ThepassagefocusesontheneedforAmericanstolearnforeignlanguages.Itispossibletoget______ofEsperantospeakersan
最新回复
(
0
)