首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Wikipedia’s Trembling [A] Wikipedia is dying! Wikipedia is dying! That’s the line repeated by the media every six months or so s
Wikipedia’s Trembling [A] Wikipedia is dying! Wikipedia is dying! That’s the line repeated by the media every six months or so s
admin
2017-12-07
25
问题
Wikipedia’s Trembling
[A] Wikipedia is dying! Wikipedia is dying! That’s the line repeated by the media every six months or so since 2009, when Spanish researcher Felipe Ortega first noticed that unprecedented numbers of volunteer editors were abandoning the sixth most popular website in the world. As the now familiar story goes, the byzantine (极其复杂的) infrastructure behind the free, crowdsourced encyclopedia—30 million articles in 287 languages, including more than 4.3 million in English—is choking to death. Wikipedia pessimists say the site is fatally blocked by white American men who would rather describe the extreme details of a new breed of Pokemnon or fervently debate the politicization of an Arabic food than guide a diverse group of new editors around the world.
[B] The other corrosive element is the pervasive fighting by editors that sometimes supersedes (替代) the facts. "You have to realize that there are two very different sides to Wikipedia," Tare, a 40-year-old IT worker from New England, told Newsweek in an email. One is "the public face of Jimbo Wales and ’the sum of human knowledge,’ represented in tens of hundreds of thousands of articles, i.e. the encyclopedia proper." The other is "harsh and ugly," like "taking the red pill and waking up in the Matrix."
[C] In many ways, Wikipedia is a victim of its success, and the Wiki spirit upon which it was founded. The site grew quickly: more than 20,000 articles in 18 languages just one year after Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger founded it in January 2001. Two years later, Wales launched the Wikimedia Foundation to finance and run the site; the nonprofit now has a staff of 187 people who develop and maintain open-content, Wild-based products. After the site, saw gigantic growth from 2004 to 2007—the English-language Wikipedia had around 750,000 entries by late 2005—the community created some tools to preserve quality and accuracy. Things didn’t go as planned
[D] A study published in the American Behavioral Science Journal by former Wikimedia fellows earlier this year found that the new automated quality-control tools and bureaucratic editing guidelines "crippled the very growth they were designed to manage" by scaring off new editors: The proportion of "desirable newcomers"—defined in the study as both "good-faith" editors who try but fail to be productive and "golden" (successful) contributors—entering Wikipedia has not changed since 2006, and they are significantly more likely than their predecessors to have their first contributions rejected. The number of editors peaked in 2007 and has been falling ever since, and it’s now next-to-impossible to become a high-ranking "administrator," editors who check entries for accuracy and fairness.
[E] The Wikimedia foundation disclosed in its 2011-2012 annual report that "declining participation is by far the most serious problem facing the Wikimedia projects." The Wikimedia fellows behind a comprehensive study led by computer scientist and University of Minnesota Ph.D. candidate Aaron Halfaker were more blunt: They suggested Wikipedia change its motto from "the encyclopedia that anyone can edit" to "the encyclopedia that anyone who understands the norms, socializes him or herself, dodges the impersonal wall of semiautomated rejection and still wants to voluntarily contribute his or her time and energy can edit."
[F] Wikimedia has been working hard on this problem, but the site is still "almost entirely written by techno-Libertarian white guys in their 30s," said Kevin Gorman, a longtime Wikipedia editor who has done work for the Wikimedia Foundation. According to a 2011 worldwide Wikipedia Editor Survey, the typical editor is college-educated, 30 years old, and intimidatingly tech-sawy (懂行的人); 91 percent of them are men.
[G] Headlines proclaiming Wikipedia’s decline are "exaggerated and wrong," said Andrew Lih, a journalism professor at American University and author of The Wikipedia Revolution. Even Halfaker thinks there’s hope. "I’m inspired by what Wikipedia has done for the accessibility and access of knowledge generally," he told Newsweek. "But that doesn’t mean that we can’t do better."
[H] Wikimedia Executive Director Sue Gardner told Newsweek that Wikimedia is primarily focused on fixing the infrastructure, streamlining Wikipedia’s weak and inscrutable (高深莫测的) text-based editing tool so that it’s as accessible to undergraduates and grandmas as it is to geeks (极客). She believes Visual Editor, currently in buggy Beta (测试), will do just that—as soon as it stops crashing.
[I] She also pointed to another pet cause: modifying the site’s interface in small ways most users probably won’t notice. For example, when Wikimedia realized that successful editors got their sea legs by fixing typing errors, the foundation started directing new registrants toward articles full of them. "The idea is to handhold people so they’re getting positive feedback," she said. According to Wikimedia, that quick fix has led to 3,000 new Wikipedians a month making their first edits.
[J] Wikimedia has also hired diversity advocates like Sarah Stierch, a longtime Wikipedia editor and gender issues campaigner. Before joining Wikimedia as a program evaluation community coordinator, Stierch held a paid Wikimedia fellowship during which she focused on gender work and taught women around the country how to edit Wikipedia. She also founded Teahouse, described on its Wikipedia page as "a friendly place to help new editors become accustomed to Wikipedia culture, ask questions, and develop community relationships."
[K] Additionally, Wikimedia helps organize domestic and global education programs in which volunteer "ambassadors" work with college professors to assign Wikipedia entries. Gardner extolled (赞扬) the virtues of the program in Egypt, launched in spring 2012 to tackle the gender gap on the Arabic Wikipedia It reached out to arts and languages departments, where there is a higher percentage of female students. According to Wikimedia, 87 percent of the Egyptian student-editors in the program are women, and they’ve added more than 1,000 articles to the Arabic Wikipedia and have made needed edits on many existing articles.
[L] Gorman, the regional ambassador for the U.S. Education Program for California and Hawaii, spoke passionately of his work with professors and undergraduates. But he said the program lacks oversight (监督), particularly when it comes to targeting underrepresented topics, and wishes Wikimedia would consider paying ambassadors. "A lot of Wikipedians have a strong irrational fear of money," he said, which he believes holds back widespread progress.
[M] Gardner’s response: "I don’t think we would ever consider paying ambassadors, because we really don’t have to. Wikipedians naturally want to share. They like coaching new people." Gardner believes Wiki-media’s initiatives will start paying off in the next few years—and they might—but the data aren’t impressive. Stierch said her grassroots groups haven’t attracted new women to editing and that Wikimedia still struggles to find women for leadership positions.
[N] Even if Wikimedia fails to draw a diverse group of users who want to edit, not just battle one another, it seems unlikely that Wikipedia will self-destruct What it offers the world is imperfect, but so much better than no Wikipedia at all—even if, as Stierch said, the site "epitomizes (成为……的缩影) a project started by good-faith white males," like so much written history and cultural research in the Western world, that may take years to change, "I can’t even imagine a world without Wikipedia at this point," Stierch said. "Can you?"
Wiki may suffer both from its success and the spirit it’s built upon.
选项
答案
C
解析
根据its success和spirit迅速定位到C段第1句。该句提到维基百科是它的成功和当年得以创立的维基精神的受害者,题中suffer from与原文a victim of对应,the spirit it’s built upon对应原文the spirit upon which it was founded,本题句子是该句的同义表述。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/4OU7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
AstudyconductedbyanAustralianscienceagencyhasdiscoveredsignsthatthecountry’sancientAboriginesmayhavebeenthew
AstudyconductedbyanAustralianscienceagencyhasdiscoveredsignsthatthecountry’sancientAboriginesmayhavebeenthew
AstudyconductedbyanAustralianscienceagencyhasdiscoveredsignsthatthecountry’sancientAboriginesmayhavebeenthew
Webuybooks,andthentheywaitforustoreadthemDays,months,evenyears.Booksare【C1】______That’sOKforbooks,butnotf
Oncetheydecidedtohavechildren,MiShelandCarlMeissnertackledthenextbigissue:Shouldtheytrytohaveagirl?Itwas
Inrecentyears,wehaveallwatchedtheincreasingcommercializationofthecampus.Thenumerousadvertisingpostersandthego
A、Itprovidestwo-yearfreeeducationatcommunitycolleges.B、IthelpseveryAmericanreceivefreehighschooleducation.C、He
A、Becauseitprotectsyoufromgettingsunburnt.B、Becauseithelpsyougetaperfectlytannedskin.C、Becauseit’sinchargeof
A、Itisapopulartouristdestination.B、Thetrafficisveryconvenientthere.C、Therentisquitecheapthere.D、Itisaquiet
A、Shewenttovisitafriendthere.B、Shewentthereforaconferenceonce.C、Sheattendedaskiingcoursethere.D、Shespenta
随机试题
甲电视台经过主办方的专有授权,对篮球俱乐部联赛进行了现场直播,包括在比赛休息时舞蹈演员跳舞助兴的场面。乙电视台未经许可截取电视信号进行同步转播。关于乙电视台的行为,下列哪一表述是正确的?()
在题37的网络图上确定关键路线并用双线(或粗黑线)表示出来,指明总工期以及A、B、C、D四项活动的最早开始时间。
下列不属于厚朴主治病证的是
下列不属于经济效益分析的是()。
确定流动资产最佳的投资规模时,需要考虑的成本包括()。
()是指身体或身体的某一部分在单位时间内位移的距离。
【2018-28】为18世纪后期德国泛爱教育运动兴起提供直接的思想启蒙和理论指导的是()。
以下哪一条与长城无关_______。
下列哪个选项不是英国宪法的渊源()。
在考生文件夹下,打开文档word.docx,按照要求完成下列操作并以该文件名(word1.docx)保存文档。【文档开始】入世半年中国气车市场发展变化出现五大特点在中国加入WTO半年多的时间里,中国气车市场发生了深刻的变化,这种变化呈现出五大特点:产
最新回复
(
0
)