首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A federal judge on Monday certified a $200 billion class action lawsuit against the tobacco industry for its marketing of light
A federal judge on Monday certified a $200 billion class action lawsuit against the tobacco industry for its marketing of light
admin
2011-01-11
58
问题
A federal judge on Monday certified a $200 billion class action lawsuit against the tobacco industry for its marketing of light cigarettes.
Eastern District of New York Judge Jack B. Weinstein’s 540-page opinion in Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 04-CIV-1945—which included an additional 965 pages of appendices for a total of 1,505 pages—gave tens of millions of smokers an avenue to recover damages from the nation’s largest tobacco companies, including Philip Morris USA Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Lorillard Tobacco Co., and Liggett Group, Inc.
The class will include anyone who purchased light cigarettes from the time tobacco companies began selling them in the 1970s. The judge said he even would consider broadening the class, to encompass smokers of all "low tar" brands, not just light cigarettes. The judge suggested that an expansion of the class could assist the parties in negotiating a global settlement. He set a trial date for January 22, 2007. The plaintiffs intend to seek treble damages.
einstein has expressed skepticism about the plaintiffs’ theory of damages, which alleges that light smokers were defrauded of billions because they believed they were buying a product of greater value because of its health advantages. The judge also questioned the size of the class, as well as the claim that as many as 90 percent of light cigarette smokers chose the cigarettes because they were less harmful.
In his ruling Monday, the judge stressed that while the suit was far from perfect, the evidence was sufficient. He said the jury system—which he described as the "ultimate focus group of the law"—was well equipped to sort out the particulars in accordance with Amendment Ⅶ of the U.S. Constitution.
Weinstein declined to grant an interlocutory appeal to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Theodore M. Grossman of Jones Day in Cleveland, which represents R.J. Reynolds, said the defendants would seek a stay and appeal the class certification under Rule 23(f)of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The phrase "size of the class" underlined in Paragraph 4 refers to the ______ .
选项
A、number of light smokers
B、quantity of light cigarettes
C、number of plaintiffs
D、amount of money involved
答案
C
解析
词义题型见第四段第二句:The judge also questioned the size of the class,as well as the claim that as many as 90 percent of light cigarette smokers chose the cigarettes because they were less harmful.(法官也对这一类人的数量表示怀疑,正如索赔所说,有多达90%的吸淡烟的人选择淡烟是因为淡烟不那么有害);之前一句提到法官对原告的理论表示怀疑,这句说法官对the size of the class也有怀疑,两者并列;应是指文章第一句中提到的共同起诉(class action)的人即上句中的the plaintiffs。因此C为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/4UgO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Inspeechandinaction,shewasneverhaughty.
Shewasdeterminedto______herreputationintheforeignservicebylearningtospeakChinese.
ItwassoldtoanArizonaentrepreneur,LondonBridgewasthenrebuiltaspartofatouristattraction.
Despitetheirgoodservices,mostinnsarelesscostlythanhotelsof______standards.
Notonetobeeasilyfrightened,thecorporalremainedcomposedwhiletheopposingarmypressedtowardhistroop’sposition.
Kodak’sbankruptcywasasadstoryforaleadingAmericancorporationthatpioneeredphotographyandthefilmmarketfordecades
ItisablazingmorninginthePermianbasin,inwestTexas,America’smostproductiveoilfield.Onthehighplainsariggnaws
Butexpertssayfirmsarestillwaryofsharing,ifitleadstolawsuitsfromcustomersandantitrustwatchdogs.
随机试题
企业管理通过()等活动过程完成。
患者李某,女性,43岁。于夜晚外出后感寒,症见恶寒发热,无汗,头痛项强,肢体酸楚疼痛,口苦而渴。应首选方剂是
A.糖衣片B.植入片C.薄膜衣片D.泡腾片E.口含片以丙烯酸酯、羟丙甲纤维素包衣制成的片剂是
城市规划师学习行政法学的意义是()。
绞吸挖泥船施工应()。
背景资料:沿海地区某住宅工程,地下水对钢筋混凝土结构有侵蚀作用。该工程由四栋地上十二层,地下一层,结构形式完全相同的单体组成,其中地下室为整体地下室,四个单体及单体间空地均有地下部分。施工单位上报施工组织设计中,所有混凝土均采用预拌商品混凝土,水泥采用
商业银行的风险暴露不包括()。
根据合同法律制度的规定,下列各项中。属于无效格式条款的有()。
甲公司将原自用的办公楼用于出租,以赚取租金收入。租赁期开始日,该办公楼账面原价为14000万元,已计提折旧为5600万元,公允价值为12000万元。甲公司对投资性房地产采用公允价值模式进行后续计量。甲公司上述自用办公楼转换为投资性房地产时公允价值大于原
请认真阅读下文,并按要求作答。一个小村庄的故事山谷中,早先有过一个美丽的小村庄。山上的森林郁(yù)郁葱葱,村前河水清澈(chè)见底,天空湛(zhàn)蓝,空气清新甜润。村里住着几十户
最新回复
(
0
)