首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Headland Hypothesis argues that foraging or non-agricultural tribes have been unable to collect adequate carbohydrate
The Headland Hypothesis argues that foraging or non-agricultural tribes have been unable to collect adequate carbohydrate
admin
2011-01-17
49
问题
The Headland Hypothesis argues that foraging or non-agricultural tribes
have been unable to collect adequate carbohydrates in the rain forest due to its
lack of starch producing species, and were thus forced to develop trade
Line relationships with agriculturalists. This hypothesis has been shown to rest on
(5) impossibly idealized conceptions of virgin rain forest, forager behavior and
history, such that one may argue something diametrically different: millennia of
trade relationships with agricultural peoples have led to changes in forager
behaviors and in the composition of the forests they inhabit. Supposing that
humans modify their environments in ways that are generally favorable toward
(10) their continued survival, it follows that an increased reliance on agriculturalists
for carbohydrates might lead to the gradual disappearance of rain forest
starches. Horticulturalists are likely to dedicate the majority of their efforts
toward staple starch crops such as rice or wheat, which in some environments
may provide a more efficient source of carbohydrates than does foraging.
(15) Foragers, then, would be inclined to assume the "professional primitive" role,
and trade more tasty and nutritious rain forest resources such as meat and fruit
in exchange for carbohydrates, as Headland himself observed in a multitude of
cultures around the world.
Foragers may have also lost some of their knowledge and technologies
(20) related to carbohydrate extraction from the rain forest, and the carbohydrate-
rich rain forest species may have arrested their co-evolution with foragers,
leaving the impression that rain forests have always possessed insufficient
quantities of such resources to support humans. A co-evolutionary argument is
not, however, necessary to this line of reasoning, for rain forests may adapt
(25) purely in terms of the quantity and availability of extant carbohydrate-rich
species, as the case of sago palms evinces in two ways. Firstly, the selective
harvesting of some trees has been shown to have a "thinning" effect which helps
the species to gain sunlight and to thrive, positively affecting its long-term
survival, reproduction and distribution at the expense of carbohydrate-rich
(30) species. Secondly, the sago palm has two means of reproduction: vegetatively,
or through "suckers", and through seed disbursal, which whether intentional
and inadvertent is likely to increase when humans are harvesting the trees.
Although sago palms are particularly prevalent in the areas where, for instance,
the Penan foragers exploit it, there has been no study to show that this would
(35) remain the case if the Penan were to move, or to cease exploiting the trees.
Admittedly, this response to the Headland Hypothesis has problems, for
not all carbohydrate producing species are disbursed by seeds, nor have they all
been shown to benefit from human foraging behaviors. Theories of co-evolution
do, however, predict that such relationships would be likely to evolve, and the
(40) simple fact that disturbing the rain forest through fire, sago harvesting, and
countless other means available to foragers can lead to better environments for
carbohydrate growth, illustrates that significant changes could have occurred in
much less time than one might expect.
According to the passage, the case of the Penan foragers’ cultivation of the sago palm fails to indicate that
选项
A、a co-evolutionary argument is unnecessary to establishing that rain-forest adaptation is the effect of human intervention
B、plant-species inimical to carbohydrate-rich species would continue to thrive without the practices of foraging peoples
C、the "thinning" effect produced by the Penan’s foraging practice is responsible for the sago palm’s long-term survival
D、the Penan have justification for abandoning the exploitation of sago palms or relocating to more carbohydrate-rich areas
E、rain forests may evolve as a result of the quantity and availability of extant carbohydrate-rich species
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/4XjO777K
本试题收录于:
GRE VERBAL题库GRE分类
0
GRE VERBAL
GRE
相关试题推荐
DuringatriptoobservewildanimalsinAfrica,Iencounteredtheleastbraveanimalonearth,thewildebeest(角马).Isatona
DuringatriptoobservewildanimalsinAfrica,Iencounteredtheleastbraveanimalonearth,thewildebeest(角马).Isatona
Traditionally,universitieshavecarriedouttwomainactivities:researchandteaching.Manyexpertswouldarguethatboththes
Concerningmoneyoranythingelse,conflictsbetweenhusbandandwifeusuallyreflectapowerstruggle.Conflictsbetweenparent
Traditionally,universitieshavecarriedouttwomainactivities:researchandteaching.Manyexpertswouldarguethatboththes
Thepassageisprimarilyconcernedwith______Accordingtothepassage,whichofthefollowingisafactorthatisthreatening
OfthefivebillcollectorsatApexCollectionAgency,Mr.Younghasthehighestrateofunsuccessfulcollections.YetMr.Young
PREDICTION:AUGURY::
InAmericanIndianart,thesupposeddistinctionbetweenmodernandtraditionalwasfabricatedbycritics,andwhenartistshave
Thefashiondesignerfavoredfabricsthatwereso______astobevirtuallytransparent.
随机试题
患者男,38岁。发热、乏力、牙龈肿胀出血2个月入院。Hb70g/L、WBC1.1×109/L、PLT34×109/L、骨髓穿刺检查确诊为急性粒细胞白血病M5。经化疗3个疗程,骨髓达到完全缓解。1个月后又给大剂量化疗巩固治疗。化疗后患者出现骨髓抑制,三
肝硬化食管静脉曲张大出血后,可能出现的表现不包括
哪种喹诺酮类药比较适用于肺部感染?()
以下属于财会部门准予支付建设资金的情形是()。
FIDIC《施工合同条件》中,业主的索赔主要限于( )等违约行为导致的业主损失。
( )是一种最简单、运用最广泛的传统的进度计划方法,尽管有许多新的计划技术,其在建设领域中的应用仍非常普遍。
下列选项中,国产非标准设备原价的计算方法主要包括()等。
(2020年)2×18年1月1日,为建造某大型设备,甲公司从银行借入期限为2年的专门借款2000万元,年利率为4%(等于实际利率)。2×18年4月1日,甲公司按合同约定支付工程款500万元。2×18年7月1日和10月1日,甲公司分别支付工程物资款和工程进
From:JonathanWong[mailto:jonathan.wong@hydetransport.com]Sent:Monday,October27,200711:07a.m.To:JohnDevereux;Ste
设f(x)在x=1处有连续导数,又=2,则[].
最新回复
(
0
)