首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Inconspicuous Consumption Products and services that were once the preserve of a very wealthy few—from designer handbags to fa
Inconspicuous Consumption Products and services that were once the preserve of a very wealthy few—from designer handbags to fa
admin
2011-01-14
44
问题
Inconspicuous Consumption
Products and services that were once the preserve of a very wealthy few—from designer handbags to fast cars, bespoke tailoring and domestic servants—are increasingly becoming accessible, if not to everyone, then certainly to millions of people around the world. This may appall killjoy economists, but it is arguably even more upsetting to those super-rich folk who have long been able to afford luxury, and may in one crucial respect even regard it as a necessity. As Thorstein Veblen noted over a century ago in "The Theory of the Leisure Class"—the book in which he coined the phrase "conspicuous consumption"—spending lavishly on expensive but essentially wasteful goods and services is "evidence of wealth’. In the 21st century, "being a conspicuous consumer is getting harder and harder", says James Lawson of Ledbury Research, a firm that advises luxury businesses on market trends. What does a billionaire have to do to get noticed nowadays?
Being a millionaire, for instance, is becoming commonplace. In 2004 there were 8.3 million households worldwide with assets of at least $1 million, up by 7% on a year earlier, according to the latest annual survey by Merrill Lynch and Capgemini. The newly wealthy are often desperate to affirm their status by conspicuously consuming the favoured brands of the already rich. In developed countries this can be seen, in its extreme form, in the rise of "Bling"—jewellery, diamonds and other luxuries sported initially by rappets. The number of luxury buyers in the developed world is also being swelled by two other trends. First, consumers are increasingly adopting a "trading up, trading down" shopping strategy. Many traditional mid-market shoppers are abandoning middle-of-the-range products for a mix of lots of extremely cheap goods and a few genuine luxuries that they would once have thought out of their price league.
Alongside this "selective extravagance" is the growth of "fractional ownership": time-shares in luxury goods and services formerly available only to those paying full price. Fractional ownership first got noticed when firms such as Net Jets started selling access to private jets. It has since spread to luxury resorts, fast cars and much more. In America, From Bags to Riches—"better bags, better value"—lets less-well-off people rent designer handbags. In Britain, Damon Hill, a former racing driver, has launched P1 International. A L2,500 ($4,300) joining fee, plus annual membership of £13,750, buys around 50-70 driving days a year in cars ranging from a Range Rover Sport to a Bentley or a Ferrari. As a result, "the price of entry for much of what traditionally was available to the top 0.001% is now far lower", says Mr Lawson, who notes the sorry implications for a would-be conspicuous consumer: "How do I know if the guy who drives past me in a Ferrari owns it or is just renting it for the weekend?"
Demand for luxury is also soaring from emerging economies such as Russia, India, Brazil and China. Antoine Colonna, an analyst at Merrill Lynch, estimates that last year Chinese consumers already accounted for 11% of the worldwide revenues of luxury-goods firms, with most of their buying done outside mainland; China. He forecasts that by 2014, they will have overtaken both American and Japanese consumers, becoming the world’s leading luxury shoppers, yielding 24% of global revenues. These emerging consumers have a big appetite for the top luxury brands—and the owners of those brands are increasingly keen to oblige. Russia is producing today’s most determinedly conspicuous consumers. Roman Abramovich, the best-known oligarch not in jail, has conspicuously set new standards in buying mansions, ski resorts and soccer teams. For the already rich, strategies such as splashing out on ever bigger houses, longer yachts or getting special treatment from luxury-goods firms does not contribute much marginal conspicuousness. Meanwhile, the list of new ways to get noticed by the masses is shrinking fast. Even space tourism—impressive in 2001, when Dennis Tito paid Russia $20 million to visit the International Space Station—will soon be humdrum.
As it gets ever harder to consume conspicuously, are some traditional luxury consumers giving up trying? According to Virginia Postrel, author of "The Substance of Style", conspicuous consumption is much more important when people are not far from being poor, as in today’s emerging economies. In developed countries, in particular, "status is always there, but the shift in the balance is towards enjoyment". For instance, the first thing the newly super-rich tend to buy is a private plane. But that, she says, is "not so much about distinguishing themselves from the masses as not being stuck with them in a security line". Yet rather than abandoning status anxiety, the way the rich seek to display status may simply be getting more complex. As inequality grows again in rich countries, some of the very rich worry about consumption that is so conspicuous to the masses that it provokes them to try to take their wealth away. Some car-industry experts blame weak sales of the latest luxury limousines on this fear.
As well as traditional conspicuous consumption and "self-treating", Ledbury Research identifies two other motives that are driving buying by the rich: connoisseurship and being an "early adopter". Both are arguably consumption that is conspicuous only to those you really want to impress. Connoisseurs are people whom their friends respect for their deep knowledge of, say, fine wine or handmade Swiss watches. Early adopters are those who are first with a new technology. Silicon Valley millionaires currently impress their friends by buying an amphibian vehicle to avoid the commuter traffic on the Bay Bridge. Several millionaires have already paid $50,000 a go to clone their pet cat.
In America, at least, says Marian Salzman, a leading trendspotter, the focus of conspicuous consumption is increasingly on getting your children into the best schools and universiues. Harward may be. today’s ultimate luxury good. Getting into the right clubs is also as important a social statement as ever. America’s young wealthy may currently he seen at the Core Club in New York: membership is by invitation only, with a joining fee of $55,000 plus annual due 0f $12,000.
But perhaps the true symbol of exalted status in the era of mass luxury is conspicuous non-consumption. This is not just the growing tendency of the very rich to dress scruffily and drive beaten-up cars, as described by David Brooks in "Bobos in Paradise". It is showing that you have more money than you know how to spend. So, for example, philanthropy is increasingly fashionable, and multi-billion-dollar endowments such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are certainly conspicuous. However, since the new philanthropists are keen to demonstrate that their giving produces results, this does not quite meet Veblen’s threshold of being a complete waste of money. So the laurels surely go to those who are so wealthy that they are willing to buy adverts encouraging the state to tax them. Kudos, then, to those conspicuously non-consuming wealthy American opponents of recent efforts to abolish estate taxes: George Soros, Bill Gates senior (the father of the world’s richest man) and Warren Buffett.
*
选项
答案
真
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/4aVO777K
本试题收录于:
雅思阅读题库雅思(IELTS)分类
0
雅思阅读
雅思(IELTS)
相关试题推荐
Asweacquiremoreknowledge,thingsdonotbecomemorecomprehensible,butmorecomplexandmysterious.Writearesponseinwhi
Inordertobecomewell-roundedindividuals,allcollegestudentsshouldberequiredtotakecoursesinwhichtheyreadpoetry,
A、ofteninhumaneandrarelynecessaryB、unrelatedtotheactualstudyofdiseasetaxonomyC、oftennecessarybutundesirableinc
Trendstowardreformhighlighttheinternationalappealofdecentralization,buttherealitiesofeducationalandsocial
Althoughhumanshavemuchbiggerbrainsrelativetobodyweightthandootherprimates,thetotalrestingenergyrequire
Manynutritionists,havingknownfordecadesthatsaturatedfat,foundinabundanceinredmeatanddairyproducts,raise
Manynutritionists,havingknownfordecadesthatsaturatedfat,foundinabundanceinredmeatanddairyproducts,raise
Duringatimeofprotractedeconomicduress,thewealthycanbecomepoor,______bothincomefromhigh-payingjobsanddividendse
Puttingacashvalueontheecologicalservicesprovidedbynature—suchasthewaterfiltration"service"providedbyaforested
Hopingtopreservenaturalhabitats,conservationistslobbiesforlegislationthatwould______commercialdevelopmentinthese
随机试题
女,20岁,右足底被铁锈钉刺伤1周,突然出现张口困难,继之出现苦笑面容,角弓反张,声响及触碰病人可诱发上述症状,病人神志清楚,不发热。该病致病菌属于()
以下哪些情形下,行为人不用负刑事责任?()
有关我国产业结构调整的中心任务的叙述中错误舶是()。
下列不属于视错觉的是()。
《(期货经纪合同)指引》由中国期货业协会制定。()[2014年11月真题]
以某种商品实物为本位而发行的国债是()。
完整性服务提供信息的正确性,他必须和下列哪项服务配合对抗篡改性攻击?()
农产品补贴通常是指一国政府对本国的农业产品生产商或者经营者提供资金或财政上的支持,包括现金补贴、价格支持或其他政策优惠待遇,使其农业产品在国际、国内市场上与未受补贴的同类产品相比获得竞争优势。根据上述定义,下列属于农产品补贴的是:
一个足球教练这样教导他的队员:“足球比赛从来就是以结果论英雄。在足球比赛中,你不是赢家就是输家;在球迷的眼里,你要么是勇敢者,要么是懦弱者。由于所有的赢家在球迷眼里都是勇敢者,所以每个输家在球迷眼里都是懦弱者。”以下哪项是上述论证所必须假设的?
Johnsaidthathedidn’tquite______andaskedmetorepeatwhatIhadsaid.
最新回复
(
0
)