首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Imagine a chart that begins when man first appeared on the planet and tracks the economic growth of societies from then forward.
Imagine a chart that begins when man first appeared on the planet and tracks the economic growth of societies from then forward.
admin
2011-01-02
90
问题
Imagine a chart that begins when man first appeared on the planet and tracks the economic growth of societies from then forward. It would be a long, flat line until the late 16th or early 17th century, when it would start trending upward. Before then the fruits of productive labor were limited to a few elites — princes, merchants and priests. For most of humankind life was as the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes famously described it in 1651 — "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short". But as Hobbes was writing those words, the world around him was changing. Put simply, human beings were getting smarter.
People have always sought knowledge, of course, but in Western Europe at that time, men like Galileo, Newton and Descartes began to search systematically for ways to understand and control their environment. The scientific revolution, followed by the Enlightenment, marked a fundamental shift. Humans were no longer searching for ways simply to fit into a natural or divine order, but they were seeking to change it. Once people found ways to harness energy — using steam engines — they were able to build machines that harnessed far more power than any human or horse could ever do. And people could work without ever getting tired. The rise of these machines drove the Industrial Revolution, and created a whole new system of life. Today the search for knowledge continues to produce an ongoing revolution in the health and wealth of humankind.
If the rise of science marks the first great trend in this story, the second is its diffusion. What was happening in Britain during the Industrial Revolution was not an isolated phenomenon. A succession of visitors to Britain would go hack to report to their countries on the technological and commercial innovations they saw there. Sometimes societies were able to learn extremely fast, as in the United States. Others, like Germany, was benefited from starting late, leapfrogging the long-drawn-out process that Britain went through.
This diffusion of knowledge accelerated dramatically in recent decades. Over the last 30 years we have watched countries like Japan, Singapore, South Korea and now China grow at a pace that is three times that of Britain or the United States at the peak of the Industrial Revolution. They have been able to do this because of their energies and exertions, of course, but also because they cleverly and perhaps luckily adopted certain ideas about development that had worked in the West — reasonably free markets, open trade, a focus on science and technology, among them.
The diffusion of knowledge is the dominant trend of our time and goes well beyond the purely scientific. Consider the cases of Turkey and Brazil. If you had asked an economist 20 years ago how to think about these two countries, he would have explained that they were classic basket-case, Third World economies, with triple-digit inflation, soaring debt burdens, a weak private sector and snail’s-pace growth. Today they are both remarkably well managed, with inflation in single digits and growth above 5 percent. And this shift is happening around the world. From Thailand to South Africa to Slovakia to Mexico, countries are far better managed economically than they have ever been. Even in cases where political constraints make it difficult to push far-reaching reforms, as in Brazil, Mexico or India, governments still manage their affairs sensibly, observing the Hippocratic oath not to do any harm.
We are sometimes reluctant to believe in progress. But the evidence is unmistakable. The management of major economies has gotten markedly better in the last few years. Careful monetary policy has tempered the boom-and-bust economic cycles of the industrial world, producing milder recessions and fewer shocks. Every day one reads of a new study comparing nations in everything from Internet penetration to inflation. All these studies and lists are symbols of a learning process that is accelerating, reinforcing the lessons of success and failure. Call it a best-practice world.
I realize that the world I am describing is the world of the winners. There are billions of people, locked outside global markets, whose lives are still accurately described by Hobbes’s cruel phrase. But even here, there is change. The recognition of global inequalities is more marked today than ever before, and this learning is forcing action. There is more money being spent on vaccines and cures for diseases in Africa and Asia today than ever before in history. Foreign-aid programs face constant scrutiny and analysis. When things don’t work, we learn that, too, and it puts a focus either on the aid program or on local governments to improve.
This may sound overly optimistic. There are losers in every race, but let not the worries over who is winning and losing the knowledge race obscure the more powerful underlying dynamic: knowledge is liberating. It creates the possibility for change and improvement everywhere. It can create amazing devices and techniques, save lives, improve living standards and spread information. Some will do well on one measure, others on another. But on the whole, a knowledge-based world will be a healthier and richer world.
The caveat I would make is not about one or another country’s paucity of engineers or computers. These problems can be solved. But knowledge is not the same thing as wisdom. Knowledge can produce equally powerful ways to destroy life, intentionally and unintentionally. It can produce hate and seek destruction. Knowledge does not by itself bring any answer to the ancient Greek question "What is a Good Life?" It does not produce good sense, courage, generosity and tolerance. And most crucially, it does not produce the farsightedness that will allow us all to live together — and grow together — on this world without causing war, chaos and catastrophe. For that we need wisdom.
选项
答案
D
解析
细节题。出自原文第四段,采用排除法解题。第四段提到,日本、新加坡、韩国和中国发展迅速的原固有:自己的努力(energies and exertions),吸取西方成功经验(adopted certain ideas about development that had worked in the West),而后者则是知识传播的必然结果(此段第一句),故排除A、B、C,选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/54lO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Peopledonotanalyzeeveryproblemtheymeet.Sometimestheytrytorememberasolutionfromthelasttimetheyhadasimilarp
Peopledonotanalyzeeveryproblemtheymeet.Sometimestheytrytorememberasolutionfromthelasttimetheyhadasimilarp
Islanguage,likefood,abasichumanneedwithoutwhichachildatacriticalperiodoflifecanbestarvedanddamaged?Judgin
Burnoutcomeswhentherealityoflifeislessthanourexpectations.Andithasbecomeacommonpsychologicalproblem.Schoo
Burnoutcomeswhentherealityoflifeislessthanourexpectations.Andithasbecomeacommonpsychologicalproblem.Schoo
A、ThespacecraftwillflydirecttoMercury.B、ThespacecraftwillflythreetimespastMercury.C、Thespacecraftwaslauncheda
WhichofthefollowingisNOTincludedinShakespeare’sfourgreattragedies?
A、atleasteighty-onepeoplehavebeenkilledbyfloodingB、adangerousgoodswarehousehasbeendamagedbyfireC、manykilledw
Itlookedlikeatypicalbusinessmeeting.Sixmen,neatlydressedinwhiteshirtsandtiesfiledintotheboardroomofasmall
随机试题
《合同法》第31条规定,“承诺对要约的内容作出非实质性更改的,除要约人及时表示反对或者要约表明承诺不得对要约的内容作出任何变更的以外,该承诺有效,合同内容______”。()
组织结构设计的核心是()。
中毒性休克需用糖皮质激素治疗应采用下列哪种方式
土壤酸碱度亦称“土壤反应”,是土壤酸度和土壤碱度的总称。主要决定于土壤溶液中氢离子的浓度,通常以pH值表示。下列有关阐述有误的一项是()。
城镇快速路、主干路、次干路的水泥混凝土面层不得采用()。
某企业购入某存货A,其购买数量为2000件,每件售价10元,期间还发生装卸费300元,运输费200元那么,A存货的单位成本应为()元。
公民下落不明满()年的,利害关系人可以向人民法院申请宣告他为失踪人。
A.wecanmakeexceptionsforChinesecompanies.B.Iwillintroduceyouthedetails.C.WheredoIsendtheregistrationforma
在考生文件夹下的“sampl.accdb”数据库文件中已建立表对象“tVisitor”,同时在考生文件夹下还有“exam.accdb”数据库文件。请按以下操作要求,完成表对象“tVisitor”的编辑和表对象“tLine”的导入。设置“年龄”字段的“有
•ReadthistexttakenfromanarticleaboutAccounting.•Choosethebestsentencetofilleachofthegaps.•Foreachgap9—14,
最新回复
(
0
)