首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
62
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
选项
A、Students’ likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
参考文章第二段,可知作者认为学生有能力评判教师的讲课水平。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/56iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
SupposeyouworkinabigfirmandfindEnglishveryimportantforyourjobbecauseyouoftendealwithforeignbusinessmen.Now
Cananimalsbemadetoworkforus?Somescientiststhinkthatonedayanimalsmaybetrainedtodoanumberofsimplejobsthat
Despitethefactthattodayviruses(病毒)areknowntocausecancerinanimalsandincertainplants,thereexistsagreatreluct
Despitethefactthattodayviruses(病毒)areknowntocausecancerinanimalsandincertainplants,thereexistsagreatreluct
CalifornianMichaelSchwabesaidgoodbyetothegaspumptwoyearsago.Heleasedanelectriccar.Schwabesayshegetsmoreout
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’sanoldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
Eversincehumanshaveliveontheearth,theyhavemadeuseofvariousformsofcommunication.Generally,thisexpressionofth
Theyear2000willbringbigchangesincommunication.Cellphoneswillbesmallenoughtocarryinyourpocket.Videophoneswil
AttheUniversityofKansasartmuseum,scientiststestedtheeffectofdifferentcoloredwallsontwogroupsofvisitorstoan
随机试题
用直接组成成分分析法从大到小分析下列词组。(1)这板凳坐不下四个人(2)只念了四年书
Thethreatofaglobaloutbreak(疾病大爆发)ofbirdflumakesiturgentfortheinternationalcommunitytocooperateeffectively.Weal
下列各组词语中划线字的注音,完全正确的一组是()
A.普通蒸馏水B.重蒸馏水C.无二氧化碳水D.无氟水E.无氨水将惰性气体或氮气通入蒸馏水或去离子水至饱和所得的水为
下列关于颌骨解剖形态影响全口义齿固位的描述,不正确的是
“手中鸟”理论的观点认为公司分配的股利越多,公司的股票价格越高。()
被世界卫生组织列为营养调查中必测项目的三项指标是()。
长度为10km、数据传输率为10Mbps的CSMA/CS以太网,信号传播速度为200m/μs。那么该网络的最小帧长为()。
社会主义初级阶段基本路线和基本纲领之间的关系是()。
Thepeachtreetheyplantedwhentheygotmarriedbeganto______fruitlastyear.
最新回复
(
0
)