首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
46
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
选项
A、Students’ likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
参考文章第二段,可知作者认为学生有能力评判教师的讲课水平。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/56iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Animportantbusinessmanwasaskedtogiveatwenty-minutespeechinanothercity.Hewastoobusytowriteithimself,soheas
Whenyoufly,flywithBelAir.PeoplewhotravelalotflywithBelAir,becausetheyknowtheywillgetwhattheywant.
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’sanoldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
HowtoSelectaHomeComputerComputersareveryversatile.Theycandomanythingssuchasteaching,playinggames,orhelp
I’mseventeen.IhadworkedasaboxboyatasupermarketinLeangles.Peoplecametothecounterandyouputthingsintheirba
Theyear2000willbringbigchangesincommunication.Cellphoneswillbesmallenoughtocarryinyourpocket.Videophoneswil
Agreenhouseisabuildingmadeofglasswhichisusedforkeepingplantswarmwhentheoutsidetemperatureishow.Inasimilar
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
Shoppingforclothesisnotthesameexperienceforamanasitisforawoman.Amangoesshoppingbecauseheneedssomething.
随机试题
下列烧伤创面清创方法哪一项是错误的()
要对两个率比较时
下列选项指的是雷尼替丁抑制胃酸分泌的机制是()
[背景资料]某水利枢纽工程由混凝土重力坝、水电站等建筑物构成。施工单位与项目法人签订了其中某坝段的施工承包合同,部分合同条款如下:合同总金额壹亿伍仟万元,开工日期为2013年9月20日,总工期26个月。开工前项目法人向施工单位支付10%的工程预付款,
风形成的直接原因是()。
_____目前对于地球磁场的变化和倒转提出了不少理论和模型,_____基本上都处在假设和推测的阶段,并没有一个十分成熟的理论。
全面深化改革是决定当代命运的关键,习近平总书记围绕全面深化改革作出了一系列论述。下列说法错误的是:
一列客车长250m,一列货车长350m,在平行的轨道上相向行驶,从两车头相遇到两车尾相离经过15s,已知客车与货车的速度之比是5:3,则两车的速度相差().
YouwillhearaninterviewonCEORobertMcDonald,talkingaboutthenatureandprogressofthecompany’sdigitisationinitiativ
Afterintensiveresearch,scientistshaveconcludedthatpoliticianslie.InastudydescribedinBritain’sObservernewspap
最新回复
(
0
)