首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In most people’s mind, growth is associated with prosperity. We judge how well the economy is doing by the size of the Gross Nat
In most people’s mind, growth is associated with prosperity. We judge how well the economy is doing by the size of the Gross Nat
admin
2012-12-26
104
问题
In most people’s mind, growth is associated with prosperity. We judge how well the economy is doing by the size of the Gross National Product (GNP), a measure, supposedly, of growth. Equally axiomatic, however, is the notion that increased pressure on dwindling natural resources must inevitably lead to a decline in prosperity, especially when accompanied by a growth in population. So, which is correct: growth means prosperity and no growth means adversity, or growth means adversity and no growth means...what?
What growth advocates mean, primarily, when they say growth is necessary for prosperity is that growth is necessary for the smooth functioning of the economic system. In one arena the argument in favor of growth is particularly compelling and that is with regard to the Third World. To argue against growth, other than population growth, in light of Third World poverty and degradation seems callous, if not cruel, the pompous postulating of the comfortable and the secure. But is it? Could it be that growth, especially the growth of the wealthier countries, has contributed to the impoverishment, not the advancement, of Third Word countries? If not, how do we account for the desperate straits these countries find themselves in today after a century of dedication to growth?
To see how this might be the case we must look at the impact of growth on Third World countries- the reality, not the abstract stages-of-economic-growth nostrum propounded through rose-colored glasses by academicians of the developed world. What good is growth to the people of the Third World if it means the conversion of peasant farms into mechanized agri-businesses producing commodities not for local consumption but for export, if it means the stripping of their land of its mineral and arboreal treasures to the benefit of foreign investors and a handful of their local collaborators, if it means the assumption of a crushing foreign indebtedness, the proceeds of which goes not into the development of the country but into the purchase of luxury cars, the padding of Swiss bank accounts, and the buying of condominiums in Miami?
Admittedly, this is an oversimplification, which applies to no country in its entirety and to some countries not at all. But the point, I believe, remains valid; that growth in underdeveloped countries cannot simply be judged in the abstract; it must be judged based on the true nature of growth in these societies, on who benefits and who is harmed, on where growth is leading these people and where it has left them. When considered in this way, it just might be that in the present context growth is more detrimental to the well-being of the wretched of the earth than beneficial.
So, do we need growth for prosperity? Only the adoption of zero growth can provide the answer. But that is a test not easily undertaken. Modem economies are incredibly complex phenomena, a tribute to man’s ability to organize and a challenge to his ability to understanding. Anything that affects their functioning, such as a policy of zero growth, should not be proposed without a wary prudence and a self-doubting humility. But if the prospect of leaping into the economic unknown is fear-inspiring, equally so is the prospect of letting that fear prevent us from acting when the failure to act could mean untold misery for future generations and perhaps environmental catastrophes which threaten our very existence.
The author seems to believe that prosperity ______
选项
A、can be achieved without economic growth
B、can only be achieved with economic growth
C、is a tribute to man’s ability and creativity
D、is fragile in face of environmental catastrophes
答案
A
解析
根据文章第五段前两句“So,do we need growth for prosperity? Only the adoption of zero growth can provide the answer.”可知,作者首先给出设问:为达到繁荣,必须增长吗,接着给出答案:零增长也可以保持社会经济的繁荣。据此判断,答案是A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5D9O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Theyounggirlshowedwonderfulfacilityforlearninglanguages.
Itisknowntoallthatchildreninthisregionhavestrong______toswimminginsummerbecauseofthehotweather.
Mostpeoplewhotravellongdistancescomplainofjetlag.Jetlagmakesbusinesstravelerslessproductiveandmoreprone【51】maki
Inthispart,youarerequiredtowriteacompositionentitledWhatShouldWeDotoPreventPiratedProductsinnolessthan200
Thetwocountriesareobligedtoabidebytheinternationalconventionsand______ofthesechemicalweaponsundertheconventio
Rockswhichhavesolidifieddirectlyfrommoltenmaterialsarecalledigneousrocks.Igneousrocksarecommonlyreferredtoasp
Thequestionofwhetherwarisinevitableisonewhichhasconcernedmanyoftheworld’sgreatwriters.Beforeconsideringthis
Amistakeisrarelyatonedforbyasingleapology,howeverprofuse.
______isaslightlysourthickliquidmadefrommilkwithbacteriaaddedtoit,sometimessweetenedandflavoredwithfruitand
Thefinaldocumentwas,ofcourse,supposedtomendthedamage______upontheworldbythewar.
随机试题
温度是影响粮食黏度测定的主要因素。
小儿生长发育的一般规律
()又称单价合同。
下列不属于银监会负责监管的非银行金融机构是()。
根据《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》的规定,因()提起的诉讼属于专属管辖。
下列有关环境容纳量的叙述,正确的是()。
甲班与乙班同学同时从学校出发去某公园,甲班步行的速度是每小时4千米,乙班步行的速度是每小时3千米。学校有一辆汽车,它的速度是每小时48千米,这辆汽车恰好能坐一个班的学生。为了使这两班学生在最短的时间内到达,那么,甲班学生与乙班学生需要步行的距离之比是(
某商店出售甲、乙两种货物,已知甲货物的数量比乙货物多40%,每件的售价比乙货物多25%.卖完所有东西以后,店主发现实际平均每件货物的售价为330元。问实际上每件甲货物的售价为多少元?
对长度为n的线性表进行顺序查找,在最坏情况下需要比较的次数为()。
A、Itwascarefullytestedwithconsumers.B、Itwaspromotedbyhealthorganizations.C、Itwasdisapprovedbymanydietexperts.
最新回复
(
0
)