首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2010-02-17
55
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields—those having very long wave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans."
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects, For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field, the electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about I millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
It can be inferred from physical phenomenon that
选项
A、the force of the electromagnetic field is too weak to be harmful
B、the force of the electromagnetic field is weaker than the electric field that the cells generate
C、electromagnetic field may affect health
D、only more powerful radiation can knock electron out of human body
答案
A
解析
细节理解题。答案在第四段第二、三句,当电流通过电缆,产生磁场,对周围物体产生(影响)力。许多年来,科学家把任何有关“这些力可能有害的想法”置于一边(不予考虑),主要是因为它们(所产生的力)非常弱。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5E9K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Sometrytoreasonwiththepoliceofficerwhohaspulledthemoverforsomerealorimaginedtrafficoffense.Butwhenlawenfo
Theaimofajobinterviewistoestablishwhetheryouarelikelytodowellinaparticularjobinaspecificorganization.Thi
Thequestionofwhetherlanguagesshapethewaywethinkgobackcenturies;Charlemagneproclaimedthat"tohaveasecond【S1】
Thequestionofwhetherlanguagesshapethewaywethinkgobackcenturies;Charlemagneproclaimedthat"tohaveasecond【S1】
Whollyasidefromaestheticandmoralconsiderations,fashionisaneconomicabsurdity,andthereislittletobesaidinitsfa
Archaeologyhaslongbeenanacceptedtoolforstudyingprehistoriccultures.Relativelyrecentlythesametechniqueshavebeen
Whatpercentageoftheworld’sknownpetroleumreservesdoesKuwaithave?
Massivechangesinalloftheworld’sdeeplycherishedsportinghabitsareunderway.Whetherit’soneofLondon’sparksfullof
MartinLutherKin,Jr.wasfamousallovertheworld,eventhoughhe______hisDreamSpeech.
随机试题
parentcompany
下列哪项不是甲状腺功能低下的原因()
A.山根B.耳尖C.尾尖D.天门E.水沟治疗犬中风、中暑、泄泻宜选
罗伊适应模式的二级评估是指()
由60%苯乙烯、30%丙烯腈和10%甲苯乙烯的单体单元组成的聚合物(颗粒状)
经股东大会批准,公司可以接受本公司的股票作为质押权的标的。
对于下列销售收入认定,通过比较资产负债表日前后几天的发货单日期与记账日期,A注册会计师认为最可能证实的是()。
下列关于PhotoshopCS“魔棒工具”选项栏(如图所示)中“容差”值的表述正确的是()。
Druguseisrisingdramaticallyamongthenation’syouthafteradecadeofdecline.From1993to1994,marijuanauseamongyoung
当数据库系统出现故障时,可以通过数据库日志文件进行恢复。下列关于数据库日志文件的说法,错误的是()
最新回复
(
0
)