首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2010-02-17
58
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields—those having very long wave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans."
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects, For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field, the electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about I millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
It can be inferred from physical phenomenon that
选项
A、the force of the electromagnetic field is too weak to be harmful
B、the force of the electromagnetic field is weaker than the electric field that the cells generate
C、electromagnetic field may affect health
D、only more powerful radiation can knock electron out of human body
答案
A
解析
细节理解题。答案在第四段第二、三句,当电流通过电缆,产生磁场,对周围物体产生(影响)力。许多年来,科学家把任何有关“这些力可能有害的想法”置于一边(不予考虑),主要是因为它们(所产生的力)非常弱。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5E9K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Theaimofajobinterviewistoestablishwhetheryouarelikelytodowellinaparticularjobinaspecificorganization.Thi
Theaimofajobinterviewistoestablishwhetheryouarelikelytodowellinaparticularjobinaspecificorganization.Thi
Thequestionofwhetherlanguagesshapethewaywethinkgobackcenturies;Charlemagneproclaimedthat"tohaveasecond【S1】
Ideemthegirlwasinabadhealthbecausethehandshakewithherwasso______.
Toomuch______toX-rayscancauseskinburns,cancerorotherdamagetothebody.
Afghanistan’sTalibanfactionshaveagreedtofreeIranianprisonersinexchangefor______.
TheCompetitionamongproducersofpersonalcomputersisessentiallyaracetogetthebest,mostinnovativeproductstothemar
Bygivinghimelectricalshocktreatment,thedoctorhas______apartialcureofhisshortsightedness.
______trouble,I’llforgetthewholething.
Hadheworkedharder,he______theexam.
随机试题
受害人对于损害的发生也有过错的()
男性,54岁,反复发作右上腹痛、发热、黄疸4年余。4小时前突发高热,39.8℃,巩膜黄染,神志不清,血压68/45mmHg,脉搏140/min,WBC20×109/L。如果该病人行手术治疗,首选的手术方式是
下列哪项性能不属于建筑外墙门窗安装工程质量复验的内容?
模板设计中,新浇混凝土的荷载,通常可按()kN/m3计。
医生用的听诊器
已知某公司财务数据如下:主要业务收入2500000元,主要业务成本1260000元,管理费用700000元,年初应收账款500000元,年末应收账款450000元,根据上述数据可以算出()。
市场覆盖战略包括()策略。
甲公司获得了某医用镊子的实用新型专利,不久后乙公司自行研制出相同的镊子,并通过丙公司销售给丁医院使用。乙、丙、丁都不知道甲已经获得该专利。根据《专利法》的规定,下列选项中,正确的是()。
根据我国《宪法》的规定,省、自治区、直辖市的区域划分,由()批准。
符号消费是指在消费过程中。消费者除消费产品本身以外,同时也消费这些产品所象征和代表的意义、心情、美感、档次、情调和气氛,即对这些符号所代表的“意义”或“内涵”的消费。根据上述定义,下列体现了符号消费的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)