首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
admin
2010-03-25
41
问题
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one story fits all of Asia. This is, of course, silly. all of these economies plunged into economic crisis within a few months of each other, so they must have had something in common.
In fact, the logic of catastrophe was pretty much the same in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Korea. (Japan is a very different story. ) In each case investors -- mainly, but not entirely, foreign banks who had made short-term loans -- all tried to pull their money out at the same time. The result was a Combined banking and currency crisis: a banking crisis because no bank can convert all its assets into cash on short notice; a currency crisis because panicked investors were trying not only to convert long term assets into cash, but to convert baht or rupiah into dollars. In the face of the stampede, governments had no good options. If they let their currencies plunge, inflation would soar and companies that had borrowed in dollars would go bankrupt; if they tried to support their currencies by pushing up interest rates, the same firms would probably go bust from the combination of debt burden and recession. In practice, countries split the difference -- and paid a heavy price regardless.
Was the crisis a punishment for bad economic management? Like most cliches, the catchphrase "crony capitalism" has prospered because it gets at something real: excessively cozy relationships between government and business really did lead to a lot of bad investments. The still primitive financial structure of Asian business also made the economies peculiarly vulnerable to a loss of confidence. But the punishment was surely disproportionate to the crime, and many investments that look foolish in retrospect seemed sensible at the time.
Given that there were no good policy options, was the policy response mainly on the right track? There was frantic blame-shifting when everything in Asia seemed to be going wrong; now there is a race to claim credit when some things have started to go right. The International Monetary Fund points to Korea’s recovery -- and more generally to the fact that the sky didn’t fall after all -- as proof that its policy recommendations were right. Never mind that other IMF clients have done far worse, and that the economy of Malaysia- which refused IMF help, and horrified respectable opinion by imposing capital controls -- also seems to be on the mend. Malaysia’s Prime Minister, by contrast, claims full credit for any good news -- even though neighbouring economies also seem to have bottomed out.
The truth is that an observer without any ax to grind would probably conclude that none of the policies adopted either on or in defiance Of the IMF’s advice made much difference either way. Budget policies, interest rate policies, banking reform -- whatever countries tried, just about all the capital that could flee, did. And when there was no more money to run, the natural recuperative powers of the economies finally began to prevail. At best, the money doctors who purported to offer cures provided a helpful bedside manner; at worst, they were like medieval physicians who. prescribed bleeding as a remedy for all ills.
Will the patients stage a full recovery? It depends on exactly what you mean by "full". South Korea’s industrial production is already above its pre-crisis level; but in the spring of 1997 anyone who had predicted zero growth in Korean industry over the next two years would have been regarded as a reckless doomsayer. So if by recovery you mean not just a return to growth, but one that brings the region’s performance back to something like what people used to regard as the Asian norm, they have a long way to go.
At the end of the passage, the writer seems to think that a full recovery of the Asian economy is
选项
A、due.
B、remote.
C、imaginative.
D、unpredictable.
答案
B
解析
这题的答案比较明确;在最后一段中的最后一句里作者认为亚洲经济全面复苏的日期遥远。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5EqO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Actually,though,America,the"landofimmigrants",hasalwayshadpeopleofmanydifferentnationalitiesandlanguages.The19
Thefreedomtoleaddifferenttypesoflifeisreflectedintheperson’scapacityset.Thecapacityofapersondependsonavar
Thefreedomtoleaddifferenttypesoflifeisreflectedintheperson’scapacityset.Thecapacityofapersondependsonavar
Thefreedomtoleaddifferenttypesoflifeisreflectedintheperson’scapacityset.Thecapacityofapersondependsonavar
Iamoneofthemanycitypeoplewhoarealwayssayingthatgiventhechoicewewouldprefertoliveinthecountryawayfromth
Iamoneofthemanycitypeoplewhoarealwayssayingthatgiventhechoicewewouldprefertoliveinthecountryawayfromth
随机试题
汽油箱“双阀”式油箱盖中的“双阀”是指什么?各有何作用?
肿瘤的主要特点是
财务分析是在现行()下,通过财务效益与费用的预测,编制财务报表。
厂房的火灾危险性是根据生产中使用或产生的物质性质及其数量等因素进行确定,主要分为甲,乙,丙、丁、戊等五类。下列关于厂房的火灾危险性说法中不正确的是()。
对企业财产保险综合险进行财产损失理算时,通常把资产划分为( )来进行分别考虑。
教育方针具有阶级性和时代性、行政性和法令性、稳定性和______性。
学校人际关系中最基本的关系是()。
甲某遭到乙某等三人的无端殴打,并被乙某用刮刀刺伤。甲某急忙夺路跑走,此时,乙某等人高呼:“抓小偷!”路人丙某不明真相,上前抓住甲某。甲某一时难以挣脱,不得已刺伤丙某,得以脱身。事后查明,甲某被乙某刺成重伤,甲某给丙某造成轻微伤害。则甲某的行为()
—Yousaydifferentanimalsneeddifferentamountsofterritory.Couldyougiveussomespecificexamples,Lisa?—Yes,I’vegoti
A、Itwascreatedmainlyforscientificresearch.B、Itworksbetterinfineweatherconditions.C、Itmustbelocatedonatleast
最新回复
(
0
)