To what extent are the unemployed failing in their duty to society to work, and how far has the State an obligation to ensure th

admin2010-05-26  49

问题     To what extent are the unemployed failing in their duty to society to work, and how far has the State an obligation to ensure that they have work to do? It is by now increasingly recognized that workers may be thrown out of work by industrial forces beyond their control, and that the unemployed are in some sense paying the price of the economic progress of the rest of the community. But concern with unemployment and the unemployed varies sharply. The issues of duty and responsibility were reopened and revitalized by the unemployment scare of 1971-1972. Rising unemployment and increased stuns paid out in benefits to the workless had reawakened controversies which had been inactive during most of the period of fuller employment since the war ended the Depression. It looked as though in future there would again be too little work to go round, so there were arguments about how to produce more work, how the available work should be shared out, and who was responsible for unemployment and the unemployed.
    In 1972 there were critics who said that the State’s action in allowing unemployment to rise was a faithless act, a breaking of the social contract between society and the worker. Yet in the main any contribution by employers to unemployment such as laying off workers in order to introduce technological changes and maximize profits tended to be ignored. And it was the unemployed who were accused of failing to honor the social contract, by not fulfilling their duty to society to work. In spite of general concern at the scale to the unemployment statistics, when the unemployed were considered as individuals, they tended to attract scorn and threats of punishment. Their capacities and motivation as workers and their value as members of society became suspect. The unemployed were accused of being responsible for their own workless condition, and doubts were expressed about the State’ s obligation either to provide them with the security of work or to support them through Social Security.
    Underlying the arguments about unemployment and the unemployed is a basic disagreement about the nature and meaning of work in society. To what extent can or should work be regarded as a service, not only performed by the worker for society but also made secure for the worker by the State, and supported  if necessary? And apart from cash are there social pressures and satisfactions which cause individuals to seek and keep work, so that the workless need work rather than just cash?
It is the author’ s belief that______.

选项 A、unemployment must lead to inevitable depression of national economy
B、the unemployed are the victims of economical and social development
C、unemployment should be kept under the control of industrial forces
D、the unemployed are not entitled to share the benefits from technological progress

答案B

解析 B项与第1段意思相符,其中victims of...(……的受害者)相当于该句的paying the price of (为……付出代价)。作者表达的是失业者是经济和社会发展的产物,是受害者。其余三项皆非作者之意。A项说失业会不可避免的导致国家经济危机。C项说失业应保持在工业力量的控制之下。D项失业者没有资格分享工业进步的益处。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5IV7777K
0

最新回复(0)