In this year’s State of the Union address, President Obama outlined a plan to gradually raise the minimum wage from $7.25 to $9/

admin2022-07-26  36

问题     In this year’s State of the Union address, President Obama outlined a plan to gradually raise the minimum wage from $7.25 to $9/hour. Raising the minimum wage has always been contentious, but necessary. Yet this is a political fight we shouldn’t have to have. The poor-mostly women and minorities—make too little. And the more radical aspect of Obama’s plan could fix that for good. The president has proposed indexing minimum wage, meaning that it would increase each year as the cost of living slowly climbs, free from the whims of partisan fighting.
    Our federal minimum wage began in 1938, when President Franklin Roosevelt signed the Fair Labor Standards Act, which also limited the work-week to 44 hours, provided guaranteed overtime and placed limits on child labor. The minimum wage was set at 25 cents an hour (about $4.10 today). Its purpose was simple: guarantee that Americans who went to work received a wage they could live on. And the hope was that higher wages for workers would mean more consumer spending, thus strengthening the U. S. economy. Since its enactment, the benefits of a minimum wage have been well established.
    It is important to consider how much people earning the minimum wage actually make. At present, a minimum wage earner working 40 hours a week without ever taking a vacation will make $15,080 a year. Obama’s proposed increase would mean an additional $3,640. Most minimum wage workers are adults, not teens, and most work for large corporations, not mom-and-pop stores. This means there are hard-working parents who are employed full-time at places that make billions in profits and often receive considerable tax breaks. And yet these parents still don’t earn enough to live above the poverty line.
    How have we gotten to a place where people can work tirelessly and still not make ends meet? In large part it’s the result of political ambivalence to the conditions of poverty and the wages of our lowest paid workers. As the minimum wage has remained flat, productivity has increased, and so too have corporate profits.
    While the economic arguments for raising the minimum wage are important, we should also not forget to think about the morality of our economy. We all derive not just wages from our labors, but purpose, meaning and a sense that we are part of something greater than ourselves: by supporting our family, helping our co-workers, and participating in the shared enterprise of community. Yes, the minimum wage should be higher. But it’s not just because it’s good for the economy and will help raise the wages of even nonminimum wageworkers. It’s because there is a value to work that is deeper than money.
Hard-working people fail to make ends meet largely because of

选项 A、the absence of morality.
B、the partisan combat.
C、the increase of productivity.
D、the pursuit of profits.

答案B

解析 这一题其实很简单,要注意的是一定要在文中找答案,实现“阅读”中“理解”,切忌自我主观想象。文章第四段一开头就对此发问。紧接着第2句给出回答:In large part it’s the result of political ambivalence...,即使不确定ambivalence的意思。根据political一词也可确定B项正确。A项过度联想。在文章最后一段作者呼吁“不能忘记经济的道德性”。但与本题所问内容无关,不选。C项和D项都出现在第四段最后一句,句中阐述的只是现实状况,并非造成多劳却少得的原因。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5QmZ777K
0

最新回复(0)