首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Are some people born clever, and others born stupid? Or is intelligence developed by our environment and our experiences? Strang
Are some people born clever, and others born stupid? Or is intelligence developed by our environment and our experiences? Strang
admin
2022-02-18
69
问题
Are some people born clever, and others born stupid? Or is intelligence developed by our environment and our experiences? Strangely enough, the answer to both these questions is yes. To some extent our intelligence is given us at birth, and no amount of special education can make a genius out of a child born with low intelligence. On the other hand, a child who lives in a boring environment will develop his intelligence less than one who lives in rich and varied surroundings. Thus the limits of a person’s intelligence are fixed at birth, but whether or not he reaches those limits will depend on his environment. This view, now held by most experts, can be supported in a number of ways.
It is easy to show that intelligence is to some extent something we are born with. The closer the blood relationship between two people, the closer they are likely to be in intelligence. Thus if we take two unrelated people at random (任意的) from the population, it is likely that their degrees of intelligence will be completely different. If on the other hand we take two identical (完全相同的) twins they will very likely be as intelligent as each other. Relations like brothers and sisters, parents and children, usually have similar intelligence, and this clearly suggests that intelligence depends on birth.
Imagine now that we take two identical twins and put them in different environments. We might send one, for example, to a university and the other to a factory where the work is boring. We would soon find differences in intelligence developing, and this indicates that environment as well as birth plays a part. This conclusion is also suggested by the fact that people who live in close contact with each other, but who are not related at all, are likely to have similar degrees of intelligence.
In the second paragraph "if we take two unrelated people at random (任意的) from the population" means if we________.
选项
A、pick up any two persons
B、choose two persons who are relatives
C、take out two different persons
D、choose two persons with different intelligence
答案
A
解析
句子理解题。考查词组“at random”的意义“任意地,随便地”,因此选项A最贴切。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5UQD777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库普高专升本分类
0
英语
普高专升本
相关试题推荐
从系统论的视角来看,政策系统的子系统是()
人们对公共政策的科学认识,通过政策研究而获得的学理性知识是指()
智力发展有何特征?
Thehiringprocessmaybedifferentfromonecompanytoanother.Nevertheless,thegoalisthesame—getthecandidatewhoisthe
A.Heisseniortoeveryoneelseinthecompany.B.Thatman’stemperisnotsobadasyouhavedescribed.C.Suchpeopleaswis
Asthemanager’sprivatesecretary,Helenhaseasy________toallhiscorrespondence.
TheBunsenBurnerissonamedbecauseitisthought________byRobertBunsen.
Onlyafterayear________toseetheresultsofmyexperiment.
Heneverwentoutside;buthewassickofstayinghomeandwantedtogooutforonce.
I________mywalletwhenIwasshoppinginthestore.
随机试题
胬肉治疗方法为
下列属于关节基本构造的结构是
关于某自治州制定的自治条例说法正确的是:()。
某工艺性空调房间尺寸为6.0m×4.0m×3.0m,要求恒温为(20±0.5)℃,房间冷负荷为1200W,湿负荷为0,则送风量为_______m3/h时能满足气流组织要求。
某餐厅设有可坐12人和可坐10人两种规格的餐桌共28张,最多可容纳332人同时就餐,问该餐厅有几张10人桌?()
继承人在遗产处理前没有作出放弃或接受继承表示的,视为()。
甲因走私武器罪被判处15年有期徒刑,剥夺政治权利5年;因组织他人偷越国境罪被判处14年有期徒刑,并处没收财产5万元,剥夺政治权利3年;因犯骗取出口退税罪被判处10年有期徒刑,并处罚金20万元;因招摇撞骗罪被判处管制1年。关于数罪并罚,下列符合《刑法》规定的
Publicfiguressuchasactors,politicians,andathletesdrawmuchattentionfromthepublic;theirage,income,family,marital
ThemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonalNothingcan【1】thejoyofdiscoveringforyourselfsomethingthati
A、Thesecitiesgrowrelativelyslowly.B、Thesecities’growthisparalleltotheirindustrialgrowth.C、Thesecitieshavegrown
最新回复
(
0
)