首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Are some people born clever, and others born stupid? Or is intelligence developed by our environment and our experiences? Strang
Are some people born clever, and others born stupid? Or is intelligence developed by our environment and our experiences? Strang
admin
2022-02-18
58
问题
Are some people born clever, and others born stupid? Or is intelligence developed by our environment and our experiences? Strangely enough, the answer to both these questions is yes. To some extent our intelligence is given us at birth, and no amount of special education can make a genius out of a child born with low intelligence. On the other hand, a child who lives in a boring environment will develop his intelligence less than one who lives in rich and varied surroundings. Thus the limits of a person’s intelligence are fixed at birth, but whether or not he reaches those limits will depend on his environment. This view, now held by most experts, can be supported in a number of ways.
It is easy to show that intelligence is to some extent something we are born with. The closer the blood relationship between two people, the closer they are likely to be in intelligence. Thus if we take two unrelated people at random (任意的) from the population, it is likely that their degrees of intelligence will be completely different. If on the other hand we take two identical (完全相同的) twins they will very likely be as intelligent as each other. Relations like brothers and sisters, parents and children, usually have similar intelligence, and this clearly suggests that intelligence depends on birth.
Imagine now that we take two identical twins and put them in different environments. We might send one, for example, to a university and the other to a factory where the work is boring. We would soon find differences in intelligence developing, and this indicates that environment as well as birth plays a part. This conclusion is also suggested by the fact that people who live in close contact with each other, but who are not related at all, are likely to have similar degrees of intelligence.
In the second paragraph "if we take two unrelated people at random (任意的) from the population" means if we________.
选项
A、pick up any two persons
B、choose two persons who are relatives
C、take out two different persons
D、choose two persons with different intelligence
答案
A
解析
句子理解题。考查词组“at random”的意义“任意地,随便地”,因此选项A最贴切。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5UQD777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库普高专升本分类
0
英语
普高专升本
相关试题推荐
托马斯.戴伊的著作《自上而下的政策制定》对美国政治和政策过程进行了考察,这部著作所用的分析视角是()
下列关于模型的说法错误的是()
简述政策分析的价值。
智力发展有何特征?
心向与问题解决关系的正确表述是()
StudentscantravelintheUnitedStateswithoutspendingtoomuchmoneyiftheyfollowthesesuggestions.Atravelagentca
________theEnglishexaminationIwouldhavegonetotheconcertlastnight
Howmuchlivingspacedoesapersonneed?Whathappenswhenhisspacerequirementsarenotadequatelymet?Sociologistsandpsyc
Shewilltelluswhyshefeelssostronglythateachofushasarole________inmakingtheearthabetterplacetoliveon.
Formostpeople,lifeiseasierandmorecomfortablethaneverbefore.Convenientfoodsfromthesupermarketsimplifyshoppinga
随机试题
抗阻训练一般不作为()的练习方法。
关于慢陛化脓性中耳炎,叙述正确的是
患儿,女,4岁。发热1天,全身出现红色斑丘疹,继有疱疹,头面躯干多见,舌红苔薄白,脉浮数。首选考虑的诊断是
国际工程投标报价过程中,对生产要素进行询价主要包括()。
回购业务的结算中,第二次结算称为()。
专家:只有当一个物品的产权界定清晰,并且能够对它进行交易时,该物品的真正价值才能体现出来。我们说要保护农民的利益,如果连农民的最大利益是什么都搞不清楚,如何保护?农民有什么值钱的东西?就是那块宅基地。只有让宅基地的价值得到充分体现,才叫真正保护农民的利益。
A、 B、 C、 D、 D
LiuWang
(上海理工大学2006年试题)Inatelephonesurveyofmorethan2,000adults,21%saidtheybelievedthesunrevolved(旋转)aroundtheearth
NarratorListentopartofaconversationbetweenastudentandaprofessor.Nowgetreadytoanswerthequestions.You
最新回复
(
0
)