首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2013-12-06
10
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very longwave-lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans".
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that electromagnetic fields present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
Why did the Pentagon and White House object to the release of the report? Because______.
选项
A、it may stir a great deal of debate among the Bush Administration
B、every unit of the modern military has depended on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment
C、the Pentagon’s concern was understandable
D、they had different arguments
答案
B
解析
五角大楼和白宫所以反对环保署公布报告之理由就在此。空军方面的专家所以说环保署方面的报告“歪曲了整个文件以证明两者之间的关系”也在此。所以文内说“五角大楼的关注是可以理解的。”
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5cU3777K
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
肝内胆道结石的主要症状为
下列有关球后溃疡的描述,正确的有
A、Hefeelscold.B、Hefeelsfaint.C、Hefeelsnothingbutsleepy.D、Hefeelshimselffallingdown.D通过男士的话IfeelthatIamgoing
Youfeelgenerallydepressedandunabletoconcentrate.Your【C1】______ofdailyactivitymaychange;youfindyourself【C2】______a
A、Elongatedandstringy.B、Roundandcompact.C、Flatandtransparent.D、Flexibleandchainlike.C录音中讲到nervefiber的形状是long,string
Folkwisdomholdsthattheblindcanhearbetterthanpeoplewithsight.Scientistshaveanewreasontobelieveit.Researc
Inasocietywhereallaspectsofourlivesaredictatedbyscientificadvancesintechnology,scienceistheessenceofourexi
TherearemanytheoriesaboutthebeginningofdramainancientGreece.Theonemostwidelyacceptedtodayisbasedontheassum
Recentstudiesofthehumanbrainhaveresultedinsomeinterestingdiscoveries.Scientistsbelievethatawaytoimprovethepo
Butitwasnotuntilthe1890’sthatarchaeologistsexcavatingincity-stateswelltothesouthofNinevehfoundmanythousands
随机试题
A.全层B.黏膜层C.黏膜层及黏膜下层D.肌层Crohn病常累及肠壁
妊高征最常见的并发症
咽后壁组织瓣的宽度一般为咽后壁宽度的
大气评价等级的确定是根据项目的初步工程分析结果,选择1~3种主要污染物,分别计算每一种污染物的()及第i个污染物的地面浓度达标准限值10%时所对应的最远距离D10%。
城市道路规划设计内容包括()
[背景资料]某建筑工程,建筑面积3.6万m2,地下2层,地上16层。施工单位(以下简称“乙方”)与建设单位(以下简称“甲方”)签订了施工总承包合同,合同工期600d。合同约定,工期每提前(或拖后)1d,奖励(或罚款)1万元。乙方将屋面和设备安装两
收入可能表现为资产的增加,也可能表现为负债的减少。()
党的十八届五中全会提出,坚持绿色发展,必须坚持()的基本国策,坚持可持续发展,坚定走生产发展、生活富裕、生态良好的文明发展道路。
A、2.5B、0C、-3D、-5D本题的规律为左半圆中的两个数字的积等于右半圆中两个数字的和。依据此规律可知未知项为-5,故选D。
A单独完成某项工作需要x小时,B单独完成这项工作需要y小时,假设A,B两人一起工作,需要多少时间完成这项工作。
最新回复
(
0
)