首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
admin
2019-03-04
39
问题
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25.
For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B, C or D.
Are You Afraid of MOOCs?
Are MOOCs and other online materials a threat to quality public higher education, and to our role as professors? The members of the philosophy department at San Jose State University think so. They recently issued an open letter to Michael Sandel, a professor of Harvard University, objecting to his role in encouraging the use of MOOCs at public universities. The controversy stems from San Jose State’s contract with edX, a company that provides MOOCs, including one based on Sandel’s course on justice at Harvard. San Jose State has agreed to use materials provided by edX, but the philosophy department has refused to use Sandel’s online lectures in its courses. Though MOOCs are still new, many of the arguments presented by the San Jose State philosophy professors do not ring true in light of my experience.
We should begin by distinguishing two issues. The philosophy professors state that they have felt pressured by their administration to use the materials from Sandel’s course. The administration denies exerting any such pressure. Whatever the truth of the matter, that is an issue of academic freedom, and not about the pedagogical merits of using MOOCs and other online materials. I certainly agree that professors should be, responsible for the content and pedagogy in their own courses.
The real issue, then, is whether the availability and use of online materials, whether through MOOCs or through other channels, is a threat to quality education, especially at public universities. Many of the arguments presented in the letter presuppose an either/or, all-or-nothing approach when it comes to face-to-face versus online teaching. But the whole point of a hybrid, or blended, course is that it combines both. And it is difficult to see why it makes a great deal of difference whether the online content is delivered via a MOOC or not.
Nothing will ever replace the face-to-face discussions that occur in the classroom. But in many traditional, on-campus courses, little discussion occurs. In a lecture course with hundreds, or even just scores, of students, much of the time in the classroom is inevitably spent with the professor lecturing and the students(hopefully)taking notes-or at least listening attentively. In courses with a significant lecture component, the advantages of using online lectures are undeniable. I know from my own experience that, if my attention wanes for a few moments, it is very convenient to simply go back and play a portion again. One can do the same if one doesn’t quite understand something the first time. And one need not miss material to take a bathroom break.
The availability of high-quality online lectures is an opportunity to rethink how we spend our time in the classroom. If an online lecture presents the material, or walks students through an argument, we are freed to spend more time discussing the aspects of the material that are most difficult-or most interesting. We can do other kinds of activities that we might not have time for if we felt obliged to present the material in the traditional way. Yes, hybrid courses usually involve less face-to-face time, but that time can be better and more effectively spent.
The crucial thing is that
the instructor remains in the driver’s seat
-and that takes us back to academic freedom. As long as individual professors are choosing what material to assign or recommend, running their in-class discussions and adding material that they think is not adequately covered in the online lectures, choosing the assignments and tests, and grading those tests, there is no threat to the professoriate, or to the quality of education at universities, public or otherwise.
With the help of online lectures, professors can______.
选项
A、use the classroom time more effectively
B、have more face-to-face time with students
C、develop more materials for offline instruction
D、enjoy more free time and breaks between classes
答案
A
解析
根据第5段最后一句“Yes,hybrid courses…more effectively spent”,可排除B,确定选A,而C,D文中没有提到。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5d9d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
YouareBarbaraCrust,themotherofRoger.YouwritealettertoinviteAlfred,Roger’sbestfriendatschool,tocomeandstay
YougotaletterfromJimGreen,apersonworkingatthemarketingdepartmentofacompany.
HereisanadvertisementaboutforacertainpositioninthenewspaperofDec.7,2005.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethe
Readthefollowingletterandcompletethegiveninformationform.Writeaword,phraseornumberinthespaces1-5.De
Readthefollowingtextanddecidewhichanswerbestfitseachspace.Forquestions26-45,markoneletterA,B,CorDony
Readthefollowingarticleandanswerquestions19-25.Forquestions19-25,choosethecorrectanswerA,B,CorD.Mark
Readthefollowingarticleandanswerquestions19-25.Forquestions19-25,choosethecorrectanswerA,B,CorD.Mark
Readthefollowingarticleandanswerquestions9-18onthenextpage.HappinessSecretsforToughTimes1.
Readthefollowingpassageanddecidewhichanswerbestfitseachspace.Forquestions26~45,markoneletterA,B,CorDo
Readthefollowingpassageanddecidewhichanswerbestfitseachspace.Forquestions26~45,markoneletterA,B,CorDo
随机试题
在项目竞标阶段,咨询公司与客户各自的目的是什么?
由于胰岛素的分泌过少所致的尿多为
商业银行可接受质押的财产有()。
近年来,出租保险箱业务发展迅速,成为代保管业务的主要产品。()
[资料二]甲公司为从事机械设备加工生产与销售的一般纳税人,适用的增值税税率为17%,所得税税率为25%,2010年度至2011年度发生的有关固定资产业务如下:(1)2010年12月20日,甲公司向乙公司一次购进三台不同型号且具有不同生产
甲公司为增值税一般纳税人,适用的增值税税率为13%。2020年1~11月损益类科目如下表所示: 2020年12月甲公司发生有关业务资料如下: (1)6日,向乙公司销售M商品一批,增值税专用发票注明的价款为150万元,增值税税额为19.5万元,为乙公
居民个人取得的下列所得中,适用按次征收个人所得税的是()。
根据以下资料回答问题。2008年货物进口额比货物出口额()。
在IP数据报分片后,分片报头中的字段与原数据报中的字段相同的是()。
Ifyouweretobeginanewjobtomorrow,youwouldbringwithyousomebasicstrengthsandweaknesses.Successor【67】inyourwor
最新回复
(
0
)