首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In every philosophical problem, our investigation starts from what may be called "data", 【T1】by which I mean matters of common k
In every philosophical problem, our investigation starts from what may be called "data", 【T1】by which I mean matters of common k
admin
2019-08-27
49
问题
In every philosophical problem, our investigation starts from what may be called "data", 【T1】
by which I mean matters of common knowledge, vague, complex, inexact, as common knowledge always is, but yet somehow commanding our assent as on the whole and in some interpretation pretty certainly true.
In the ease of our present problem, the common knowledge involved is of various kinds. There is first our acquaintance with particular objects of daily life — furniture, houses, towns, other people, and so on. Then there is the extension of such particular knowledge to particular things outside our personal experience through history and geography, newspapers, etc. And lastly, there is the systematization of all this knowledge of particulars by means of physical science, which derives immense persuasive force from its astonishing power of foretelling the future. We are quite willing to admit that there may be errors of detail in this knowledge, 【T2】
but we believe them to be discoverable and corrigible by the methods which have given rise to our beliefs, and we do not, as practical men, entertain for a moment the hypothesis that the whole edifice may be built on insecure foundations.
In the main, therefore, and without absolute dogmatism as to this or that special portion, we may accept this mass of common knowledge as affording data for our philosophical analysis.
The first thing that appears when we begin to analyse our common knowledge is that some of it is derivative, while some is primitive; 【T3】
that is to say, there is some that we only believe because of something else from which it has been inferred in some sense, though not necessarily in a strict logical sense, while other parts are believed on their own account, without the support of any outside evidence.
It is obvious that the senses give knowledge of the latter kind: the immediate facts perceived by sight or touch or hearing do not need to be proved by argument, but are completely self-evident. 【T4】
Psychologists, however, have made us aware that what is actually given in sense is much less than most people would naturally suppose, and that much of what at first sight seems to be given is really inferred. This applies especially in regard to our space-perceptions.
For instance, we instinctively infer the "real" size and shape of a visible object from its apparent size and shape, according to its distance and our point of view. When we hear a person speaking, our actual sensations usually miss a great deal of what he says and we supply its place by unconscious inference; in a foreign language, where this process is more difficult, we find ourselves apparently grown dear; requiring, for example, to be much nearer the stage at a theater than would be necessary in our own country. Thus the first step in the analysis of data, namely, the discovery of what is really given in sense, is full of difficulty. We will, however, not linger on this point; so long as existence is realized, the exact outcome does not make any very great difference in our main problem.
The next step in our analysis must be the consideration of how the derivative parts of our common knowledge arise. Here we become involved in a somewhat puzzling entanglement of logic and psychology. 【T5】
Psychologically, a belief may be called derivative whenever it is caused by one or more other beliefs, or by some fact of sense which is not simply what the belief asserts.
Derivative beliefs in this sense constantly arise without any process of logical inference, merely by association of ideas or some equally extra-logical process. From the expression of a man’s face we judge as to what he is feeling: we say we see that he is angry, when in fact we only see a frown. We do not judge as to his state of mind by any logical process: the judgment grows up, often without our being able to say what physical mark of emotion we actually saw. In such a case, the knowledge is derivative psychologically; but logically it is in a sense primitive, since it is not the result of any logical deduction. There may or may not be a possible deduction leading to the same result, but whether there is or not, we certainly do not employ it. If we call a belief "logically primitive" when it is not actually arrived at by a logical inference, then innumerable beliefs are logically primitive which psychologically are derivative.
【T3】
选项
答案
也就是说,我们只相信某些知识,是因为它们在某种意义上是从某种别的知识推论出来的,虽然未必是精确的逻辑推论;而另外那部分知识之所以被相信是由于其自身的原因,无须任何外部证据的支持。
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5dUO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
HistorianssuchasLeRoyLadurichaveusedthedocumentstoextractcasehistories,whichhave______theattitudesofdifferent
Inthispart,youarerequiredtowriteanessayofnolessthan200wordsonScienceandHumanity.Theessayshouldbebasedon
Sleepisanimportantpartofourlives.Wespendaboutone-thirdofourlivessleeping.Formillionsofpeople,【C1】______,gett
Ishallmentiontwoorthreemattersinwhichtheneedforcooperationbetweenphilosophyandscienceisespeciallyintimate.【T
Forsometimepastithasbeenwidelyacceptedthatbabies—andothercreatures—learntodothingsbecausecertainactsleadto
Untilmeninventedwaysofstayingunderwaterformorethanafewminutes,thewondersoftheworldbelowthesurfaceofthesea
Isthetheoryofevolutionindirect______withreligiousteachings,ordoesitleaveroomfordebate?
______enoughtimeandmoney,theresearcherswouldhavebeenabletodiscovermoreinthisfield.
随机试题
窝藏、包庇罪与伪证罪的主要区别在于()
“一国两制”作为实现祖国统一大业的创造性构想,最早开始于()
药性沉降的药物是
A.中药材B.中药饮片C.中成药D.果味制剂不能纳入基本医疗保险用药范围的是
下列关于国有独资公司说法正确的有:()
企业发生会计估计变更的主要原因在于()。
在研究某城市居民的家庭消费支出时,在全部50万户家庭中随机抽取3000户进行入户调查,这项抽样调查中的样本是指该城市中()。
市场经济条件下进行初次分配时,其实现的条件是按()。
甲公司为上市公司,有关附服务年限条件的权益结算股份支付的资料如下。(1)经股东会批准,甲公司2010年1月1日实施股权激励计划,其主要内容为:甲公司向其子公司乙公司100名管理人员每人授予10万份股票期权,这些人员从2010年1月1日起必须在乙公司连续服
环境决定论的观点包括()。
最新回复
(
0
)