首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In every philosophical problem, our investigation starts from what may be called "data", 【T1】by which I mean matters of common k
In every philosophical problem, our investigation starts from what may be called "data", 【T1】by which I mean matters of common k
admin
2019-08-27
21
问题
In every philosophical problem, our investigation starts from what may be called "data", 【T1】
by which I mean matters of common knowledge, vague, complex, inexact, as common knowledge always is, but yet somehow commanding our assent as on the whole and in some interpretation pretty certainly true.
In the ease of our present problem, the common knowledge involved is of various kinds. There is first our acquaintance with particular objects of daily life — furniture, houses, towns, other people, and so on. Then there is the extension of such particular knowledge to particular things outside our personal experience through history and geography, newspapers, etc. And lastly, there is the systematization of all this knowledge of particulars by means of physical science, which derives immense persuasive force from its astonishing power of foretelling the future. We are quite willing to admit that there may be errors of detail in this knowledge, 【T2】
but we believe them to be discoverable and corrigible by the methods which have given rise to our beliefs, and we do not, as practical men, entertain for a moment the hypothesis that the whole edifice may be built on insecure foundations.
In the main, therefore, and without absolute dogmatism as to this or that special portion, we may accept this mass of common knowledge as affording data for our philosophical analysis.
The first thing that appears when we begin to analyse our common knowledge is that some of it is derivative, while some is primitive; 【T3】
that is to say, there is some that we only believe because of something else from which it has been inferred in some sense, though not necessarily in a strict logical sense, while other parts are believed on their own account, without the support of any outside evidence.
It is obvious that the senses give knowledge of the latter kind: the immediate facts perceived by sight or touch or hearing do not need to be proved by argument, but are completely self-evident. 【T4】
Psychologists, however, have made us aware that what is actually given in sense is much less than most people would naturally suppose, and that much of what at first sight seems to be given is really inferred. This applies especially in regard to our space-perceptions.
For instance, we instinctively infer the "real" size and shape of a visible object from its apparent size and shape, according to its distance and our point of view. When we hear a person speaking, our actual sensations usually miss a great deal of what he says and we supply its place by unconscious inference; in a foreign language, where this process is more difficult, we find ourselves apparently grown dear; requiring, for example, to be much nearer the stage at a theater than would be necessary in our own country. Thus the first step in the analysis of data, namely, the discovery of what is really given in sense, is full of difficulty. We will, however, not linger on this point; so long as existence is realized, the exact outcome does not make any very great difference in our main problem.
The next step in our analysis must be the consideration of how the derivative parts of our common knowledge arise. Here we become involved in a somewhat puzzling entanglement of logic and psychology. 【T5】
Psychologically, a belief may be called derivative whenever it is caused by one or more other beliefs, or by some fact of sense which is not simply what the belief asserts.
Derivative beliefs in this sense constantly arise without any process of logical inference, merely by association of ideas or some equally extra-logical process. From the expression of a man’s face we judge as to what he is feeling: we say we see that he is angry, when in fact we only see a frown. We do not judge as to his state of mind by any logical process: the judgment grows up, often without our being able to say what physical mark of emotion we actually saw. In such a case, the knowledge is derivative psychologically; but logically it is in a sense primitive, since it is not the result of any logical deduction. There may or may not be a possible deduction leading to the same result, but whether there is or not, we certainly do not employ it. If we call a belief "logically primitive" when it is not actually arrived at by a logical inference, then innumerable beliefs are logically primitive which psychologically are derivative.
【T3】
选项
答案
也就是说,我们只相信某些知识,是因为它们在某种意义上是从某种别的知识推论出来的,虽然未必是精确的逻辑推论;而另外那部分知识之所以被相信是由于其自身的原因,无须任何外部证据的支持。
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5dUO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
InPlato’sRepublicwefindadiscussionaboutmoralityandselfishness.Plato’sbrotherGlauconistryingtomakeSocratesgive
Hesaidhewasaninsurancesalesman,butlateronshediscoveredhewasa(n)______.
Socialchangeismorelikelytooccurinsocietieswherethereisamixtureofdifferentkindsofpeoplethaninsocietieswhere
Myworkwithleadersfromallwalksoflifehas______methattheywerenotbornleaders—theyaremade.
Agreatdealofattentionisbeingpaidtodaytotheso-calleddigitaldivide—thedivisionoftheworldintotheinfo(informatio
Althoughtheyplanttreesinthisareaeveryyear,thetopsofsomehillsarestill______.
Paulisan______worker,andrarelydoeswellinexaminations.Howeverheoftenrefusesourhelp.
Hehadwanteda25%raiseinpay,butaftertalkingtohisboss,hedecidedthata5%raisewouldhaveto______.(2002年中国人民大学考博
Manypeopleproposedthatanationalcommitteebeformedtodiscuss______toexistingmasstransitsystems.(2003年中国科学院考博试题)
Geneticallymodified(GM)foodstuffsareheretostay.That’snottosaythatfoodproducedby【C1】______agriculturewilldisappear
随机试题
在手术中,有下列哪些情况可判定肠管已坏死
粪便潜血检查结果呈强阳性的疾病是
A.肺通气B.肺换气C.气体在血液中的运输D.组织换气E.气体在淋巴液中的运输肺泡与肺毛细血管血液之间的气体交换过程称为()
企业法人分立、合并、迁移,应当在主管部门或审批机关批准后()日内,向登记主管机关申请变更登记、开业登记或者注销登记。
临时处理游客被蛇咬伤的正确做法是()。
传统上,认为由经理们一步一步理性的分析作出决策要优于直觉作出的决策。然而,最近的一项研究发现高级经理使用直觉比大多数中级或初级经理多得多。这确证了一项替代观点,即直觉实际上比仔细的、有条不紊的理性分析更有效。以上结论基于以下哪一项假设?( )
跨国文化管理又称“交叉文化管理”,即在全球化经营中,对子公司所在国的文化采取包容的管理方法,在跨国文化条件下克服异质文化的冲突,并因此创造出企业独特的文化,从而形成卓有成效的管理过程。根据上述定义,下列情形不属于跨国文化管理的是:
Whatdoyouthinkthespeakersare
From:customer@highwings.comTo:AnnetteO’Neal(annette.o@remotemail.com)Subject:NewChangestoHighWingsDate:January9,9
A、Gettherightpersonattherighttime.B、Changetheirsearchmethods.C、Talkaboutworkplaceissuesinthemedia.D、Paynoat
最新回复
(
0
)