首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked
admin
2015-06-14
62
问题
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked incoming students to sign a commitment to act with respect, integrity, and kindness in order to "promote understanding." Libertarian commentator Virginia Postrel, wrote that "treating ’kindness’ as the way to civil discourse doesn’t show students how to argue with accuracy and respect. " Harry R. Lewis, a former dean of Harvard College and someone with an excellent perspective on undergraduate education, warned that it impinged on freedom of thought and that "a student would be breaking the pledge if she woke up one morning and decided it was more important to achieve intellectually than to be kind."
Has empathy become the new scapegoat in the long-standing concern about academic attainment in American schools? Books like Academically Adrift chart the decline in academic rigor on American college campuses, citing the plummeting hours that students spend on studying and critical thinking skills. But there’s also been a troubling, and concurrent decrease in empathy over the past thirty years. A study of 14,000 college students published in Personality and Social Psychology Review in 2011 showed that the majority of college students today are less empathetic than their predecessors of prior decades. And other research even shows that education(like medical school!)can actually wring the empathy out of students.
Many people are squeamish about calls to increase empathy in young people because they wrongly assume that the ability to empathize is incompatible with traits like logic, reason, and impartiality. We’ve now entered a debate about how nice we should be or, rather, how nice we can afford to be and still stay competitive as a society, clinging to the pernicious belief that anything beneficial to young people must be painful and that we are in a rat race that is a zero-sum game.
In fact, there need be no tradeoff, at Harvard or anywhere else, between intellectual rigor and kindness. This is a false dichotomy, like the belief that a sick person must choose between a competent doctor and a humane one. Indeed, empathetic behavior listening well, for example actually makes a doctor better able to diagnose and treat illness, and studies show that when doctors are empathetic, their patients need less medication to relieve pain and less time to heal wounds.
People often equate empathy with gentleness and passivity. But empathy is really just a cognitive walk in another person’s shoes. An empathetic person is, fundamentally, a curious and imaginative person. Empathy involves a search for understanding. And we need today’s students to understand the world better in order to respond to its seemingly intractable problems.
Many educators agree that the intellectual skills required for the 21st century depend on not only a mastery of facts and figures, but also on complex communication, flexibility, collaboration, adaptability, and innovation. We live in a more open society than ever, with greater mixing of people and ideas.
The ability to master a new language, to translate scientific findings into policy, or to weave the concerns of one field into the terms of another(the way a Macintosh computer melds engineering and design), requires students to step outside of their own life experience and habits of mind. Steve Jobs had empathy for his customers.
Of course, we can always find examples of world-class thinkers who are oblivious to people’s feelings. But that doesn’t negate the fact that the vast majority of students will need to assume the perspective of others in order to get ahead in life. We can call this empathy. Or we can call it 21st century learning. It’s both. Empathy doesn’t always lead to more moral behavior, but it can lead to more intelligent behavior.
The author believes that
选项
A、empathy doesn’t affect college students’ performance.
B、empathy contributes to the development of logic and reason.
C、a doctor must be a person with great empathy and skills.
D、a doctor’s empathy is more effective than medication.
答案
B
解析
推断题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5fOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Onemajorobstacletoeconomicdevelopmentispopulationgrowth.Thepopulationsofmostdevelopingcountriesgrewataratemuc
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisNOTcorrect?
WiththeadventoftheInternet,informationcanbespreadwithunprecedentedspeedandhenceitislikelythatpeoplecanmake
WhichofthefollowingdoesLi-Fimostprobablystandfor?
Systematiceffortsatnationalnutritionplanningindevelopingcountriesgobackbarelyadecade.Duringthatbrieftimethere
Tounderstandthemarketingconcept,it’sonlynecessarytounderstandthedifferencebetweenmarketingandselling.Nottooma
TheCatcherintheRyeiswrittenby
DaydreamingⅠ.DaydreamingcanbeharmfulbecauseitwasconsideredasA.awasteoftimeB.a【1】______ofneurotictende
SomeProblemsFacingLearnersofEnglishAlthoughmanyEnglishlearnershavegothighscoresinanEnglishtestsuchasIELTSor
Itwasnearlybedtimeandwhentheyawokenextmorninglandwouldbeinsight.Dr.Macphaillithispipeand,leaningoverther
随机试题
周某驾驶一辆轻型厢式货车(搭载22人)行驶至丙察公路79公里加150米处时,坠入道路一侧山崖,造成12人死亡、10人受伤。周某的主要违法行为是什么?
女性,61岁,暴饮后突发急性胰腺炎人观察时要警惕该病人可能发生的最常见的并发症是
某投标人在递交投标文件的同时,按规定递交了投标保证金,其项目估算价为6000万元,则其投标保证金数额最高为()万元。
某企业的齿轮生产流水线有效工作时间为每日8小时,流水线节拍为5分钟,该流水线每日的生产能力是()件。
下列歌剧中,被称为“中国歌剧探索里程碑”的是()。
以下哪一个不属于精细加工策略?()
阅读下面这首诗,写一篇500字左右的鉴赏评论文章。涉江采芙蓉涉江采芙蓉,兰泽多芳草。采之欲遗谁?所思在远道。还顾望旧乡,长路漫浩浩。同心而离居,忧伤以终老。
甲、乙合作完成一项工作,由于配合得好,甲的工作效率比独做时提高了,乙的工作效率比独做时提高了。甲、乙两人合作4小时,完成全部工作的,第二天乙又独做了4小时,还剩下没完成。这项工作由甲独做需要
今年上半年的统计数字表明:甲省CPI在三个月环比上涨1.8%之后,又连续三个月下降1.7%;同期,乙省CPI连续三个月环比下降1.7%之后,又连续三个月上涨1.8%。假若去年12月甲乙两省的CPI相同,则以下哪项判断不真?()
______contributedtothegovernmentregulationofeconomicdevelopmentbytheactiveuseoftheShermanAntitrustActtostopmo
最新回复
(
0
)