首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’ s ( 1994 ) qualitative study of working people’ s diaries, ,se as
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’ s ( 1994 ) qualitative study of working people’ s diaries, ,se as
admin
2013-01-28
96
问题
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’ s ( 1994 ) qualitative study of working people’ s diaries, ,se assigned each diarist a set of codes to indicate employment, marital status, number of children, and size of the town in which he or she lived. To analyze the number, location and gender mix of visiting occasions, we coded each day in January and July for every year of the diary, counting the number of named visitors, the visitors’ gender, the size of the visiting occasion (1 to 4 people, or 5 and above), the gender mix of those present during the visit, and the location of the visit. While this may seem straightforward at first glance, the variable nature of the diary entries meant that the coding process was not as uncomplicated as we initially anticipated.
Given the number of diarists and the span of diary-keeping years, we faced the possibility of coding over 200,000 diary days. Because of the labor-intensive nature of the coding and the number of entries, we chose to code only 2 months—January and July—of each year a diarist kept a diary. We chose 2 months that could reflect a range of sociability. Severe January weather in New England impeded mobility, but it also freed those who were farmers from most of their labor-intensive chores. July tended to be haying season tbr farmers, which meant some people routinely worked all month in the fields—some alone, some with hired help. Further, the clement July weather meant grater mobility for all of the diary keepers. For some people—those who kept a diary for only a single year—the fact that we coded only 2 months out of each year meant we have only 62 "diary-days" to document their social lives. For others, we have several thousand. Limiting ourselves to January and July for each diary year, we nonetheless coded entries for a total of 24,752 diary days. In an effort to capture an accurate picture of visiting patterns, we coded every day of a given month, even those that had no entry or that mentioned only the weather, as well as those that recorded numerous visiting occasions in one day.
Determining a working definition of what constituted a visit was also an unexpected challenge. For example, although schoolteacher Mary Mudge kept a meticulous record of her visiting "rounds," listing names, places, and conversation topics, other diarists were not as forthcoming. A typical entry in farmer John Campbell’ s diary (9 July, 1825 ) was less amenable to our initial coding scheme: "Go to Carr’ s for Oxen." ( See Hansen and Mcdonald, 1995, for a fuller discussion of the pitfalls of coding diary data. ) We therefore created the following coding protocol.
We defined a visit as any occasion in which the diarist names the presence of individuals not of his or her household, the presence of the non-household member serving to distinguish between a community interaction and a household interaction. We also coded as visits public events at which the diarist was present but others in attendance were not named. The most common among these were records of church attendance. Although an entry "went to church" did not result in a finding of specific male or female visitors, it was a community interaction; thus, these entries were coded as gender-mixed visiting occasions of five or more people in a public place. Because of the variable nature of diary-keeping practices, we were careful to record only what we could confidently infer. Therefore, some entries record visits but no named individuals. Others, such as church attendance (which is generally a large-group event) or a visit to one named friend ( which is an intimate affair), allowed us to code the size of the group. Still others, when the location of the visit was specifically mentioned, allowed us to code the diarist as hosting, acting as a guest in another’ s home, or interaction at a public place.
What is the purpose of this study?
选项
A、To record social habits.
B、To analyze anti-social behavior.
C、To analyze frequency and purposes of social gatherings.
D、To analyze frequency and purposes of keeping diaries.
答案
C
解析
第一段提到研究人们的日记从而了解the size,the location of the visit等最后两段又提到关于visit的definition,由此可以判断研究目的是选项C所表述的内容。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5u1O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Fastfood,amainstayofAmericaneatingfordecades,mayhavereachedaplateauintheUnitedStatesasthematuringbaby-boom
Manypeopleseemtothinkthatsciencefictionistypifiedbythecoversofsomeoftheoldpulpmagazines:theBug-EyedMonster
Manypeopleseemtothinkthatsciencefictionistypifiedbythecoversofsomeoftheoldpulpmagazines:theBug-EyedMonster
Montaigne’sholdonhisreadersarisesfrommanycauses.Thereishisfrankandcuriousself-delineation.Thatinterests,becaus
"Popularan"hasanumberofmeanings,impossibletodefinewithanyprecision,whichrangefromfolkloretojunk.Thepolesare
"Popularan"hasanumberofmeanings,impossibletodefinewithanyprecision,whichrangefromfolkloretojunk.Thepolesare
Malnutritionandtheresultingimpairedgrowthanddevelopmentinchildrenofweaningageindevelopingcountriesresultsnoton
Punditswhowanttosoundjudiciousarefondofwarmingagainstgeneralizing.Eachcountryisdifferent,theysay,andnoonest
Amidremarkableprogressoninflationandfiscalreform,Italyheadsinto1998withbrightprospectsforeconomicgrowthandits
随机试题
A.卫生法律B.卫生行政法规C.卫生行政规章D.地方行政法规E.行业标准《药品管理法》属于何种层级的法律规范
常见疾病的自我药疗须知A、1日B、2日C、3日D、5日E、7日治疗荨麻疹使用抗过敏药不宜超过
在渗透系数大、地下水量大的土层中,适宜采用的降水形式为()。
在电子商务网站设计过程中,颜色搭配、版面布局以及文字图片应用等活动属于()。
下列不属于合规管理的重点内容的是()。
绩效考评数据的分析方法一般有()。(2005年5月四级真题)
班杜拉认为,行为的结果因素就是通常所说的强化,并把强化分为()。
结合材料回答问题:习近平:合作是中美两国“唯一正确的选择”中国国家主席习近平和美国总统特朗普今早举行双边会谈。习近平说,合作是两国“唯一正确的选择”,共赢才能通向更好的未来。根据中国官媒央视新闻今早播出的画面
在结构化设计方法中,下面哪一项不属于软件设计阶段任务的是()。
下面我要给大家介绍一个相机储存的小窍门。
最新回复
(
0
)