首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’ s ( 1994 ) qualitative study of working people’ s diaries, ,se as
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’ s ( 1994 ) qualitative study of working people’ s diaries, ,se as
admin
2013-01-28
28
问题
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’ s ( 1994 ) qualitative study of working people’ s diaries, ,se assigned each diarist a set of codes to indicate employment, marital status, number of children, and size of the town in which he or she lived. To analyze the number, location and gender mix of visiting occasions, we coded each day in January and July for every year of the diary, counting the number of named visitors, the visitors’ gender, the size of the visiting occasion (1 to 4 people, or 5 and above), the gender mix of those present during the visit, and the location of the visit. While this may seem straightforward at first glance, the variable nature of the diary entries meant that the coding process was not as uncomplicated as we initially anticipated.
Given the number of diarists and the span of diary-keeping years, we faced the possibility of coding over 200,000 diary days. Because of the labor-intensive nature of the coding and the number of entries, we chose to code only 2 months—January and July—of each year a diarist kept a diary. We chose 2 months that could reflect a range of sociability. Severe January weather in New England impeded mobility, but it also freed those who were farmers from most of their labor-intensive chores. July tended to be haying season tbr farmers, which meant some people routinely worked all month in the fields—some alone, some with hired help. Further, the clement July weather meant grater mobility for all of the diary keepers. For some people—those who kept a diary for only a single year—the fact that we coded only 2 months out of each year meant we have only 62 "diary-days" to document their social lives. For others, we have several thousand. Limiting ourselves to January and July for each diary year, we nonetheless coded entries for a total of 24,752 diary days. In an effort to capture an accurate picture of visiting patterns, we coded every day of a given month, even those that had no entry or that mentioned only the weather, as well as those that recorded numerous visiting occasions in one day.
Determining a working definition of what constituted a visit was also an unexpected challenge. For example, although schoolteacher Mary Mudge kept a meticulous record of her visiting "rounds," listing names, places, and conversation topics, other diarists were not as forthcoming. A typical entry in farmer John Campbell’ s diary (9 July, 1825 ) was less amenable to our initial coding scheme: "Go to Carr’ s for Oxen." ( See Hansen and Mcdonald, 1995, for a fuller discussion of the pitfalls of coding diary data. ) We therefore created the following coding protocol.
We defined a visit as any occasion in which the diarist names the presence of individuals not of his or her household, the presence of the non-household member serving to distinguish between a community interaction and a household interaction. We also coded as visits public events at which the diarist was present but others in attendance were not named. The most common among these were records of church attendance. Although an entry "went to church" did not result in a finding of specific male or female visitors, it was a community interaction; thus, these entries were coded as gender-mixed visiting occasions of five or more people in a public place. Because of the variable nature of diary-keeping practices, we were careful to record only what we could confidently infer. Therefore, some entries record visits but no named individuals. Others, such as church attendance (which is generally a large-group event) or a visit to one named friend ( which is an intimate affair), allowed us to code the size of the group. Still others, when the location of the visit was specifically mentioned, allowed us to code the diarist as hosting, acting as a guest in another’ s home, or interaction at a public place.
What is the purpose of this study?
选项
A、To record social habits.
B、To analyze anti-social behavior.
C、To analyze frequency and purposes of social gatherings.
D、To analyze frequency and purposes of keeping diaries.
答案
C
解析
第一段提到研究人们的日记从而了解the size,the location of the visit等最后两段又提到关于visit的definition,由此可以判断研究目的是选项C所表述的内容。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5u1O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
ThemilitaryaspectoftheUnitedStatesCivilWarhasalwaysattractedthemostattentionfromscholars.Theroarofgunfire,
Areyoualwayssureyouknowwhatpeoplemeanwhentheytrytodescribetheirfeelingstoyou?Weusebothwordsandgesturesto
Eighttimeswithinthepastmillionyears,somethingintheEarth’sclimaticequationhaschanged,allowingsnowinthemountain
Eighttimeswithinthepastmillionyears,somethingintheEarth’sclimaticequationhaschanged,allowingsnowinthemountain
Concernwithmoney,andthenmoremoney,inordertobuytheconveniencesandluxuriesofmodernlife,hasbroughtgreatchanges
"Popularan"hasanumberofmeanings,impossibletodefinewithanyprecision,whichrangefromfolkloretojunk.Thepolesare
Malnutritionandtheresultingimpairedgrowthanddevelopmentinchildrenofweaningageindevelopingcountriesresultsnoton
Amidremarkableprogressoninflationandfiscalreform,Italyheadsinto1998withbrightprospectsforeconomicgrowthandits
Amidremarkableprogressoninflationandfiscalreform,Italyheadsinto1998withbrightprospectsforeconomicgrowthandits
随机试题
()是婴儿失水过多的表现。
对于环氧粉末涂料本身,决定涂膜硬度的因素有很多,下列()因素决定了涂膜硬度:①主体树脂的玻璃化温度;②交联密度;③颜料和填料的硬度;④固化剂的玻璃化温度。
依法有权执行逮捕的机关是()
根据激励过程的期望理论,激励力、效价和期望值之间的关系可以表示为()
即日起,相关部门开始对住房困难家庭进行资格_______工作。[复查核对]
对病毒核酸的错误叙述是
具有收敛止血的是()
根据《民用爆炸物品安全管理条例》的规定,爆破作业单位未按照其资质等级从事爆破作业的,()。
对基坑侧壁安全等级为一级的深基坑工程,宜采取的支护形式为()。
角色按照承担者的心理状态可以分为()。
最新回复
(
0
)