首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Things You Can’t Say in Canada A) Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into o
Things You Can’t Say in Canada A) Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into o
admin
2017-11-17
24
问题
Things You Can’t Say in Canada
A) Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into one looked down upon by all others—but it can also be a lot of fun. Every culture has its unacknowledged taboos—the things you are forbidden to say or do in polite company, the accepted truths you are not allowed to doubt. You might think that a liberal, open-minded country like Canada would be free of such taboos, but you’d be wrong. In spite of our belief in our own civilized tolerance, some things are simply not open to debate. If you try, you’re bound to shock the neighbors.
B) It’s risky to question the wisdom of the tribe. You might get stoned. On the other hand, some people might walk secretly up to you afterwards and tell you that they secretly agree. So here’s a challenge to a few of our nation’s most widely held beliefs. You say these things in public at your own danger. I will be elaborating on these points over the months to come. Feel free to stone me or secretly agree—or, even better, add to the list. At the very least, they’re sure to start a good dinner-party fight.
C) Margaret Atwood writes some really awful books. The queen of Canadian literature dominates the literary world like a giant. Nobody has won more awards than she has, and nobody is more feared. There is no such a thing as a bad review of a Margaret Atwood book in Canada That’s too bad, because many of her books are tedious and unreadable, full of unpleasant characters and plot filled with torture. Why will no one say so? Because we’re grateful that she has put us on the global map. And because if they do, they’ll never work in this country again.
D) Recycling is a waste of time and money. Once upon a time it was easy to put out the trash. Today, the Garbage Gestapo rules our lives. Every household has become a mini version of the village dump, and every one of us has become a garbage picker, carefully separating our organic waste from our bottles and papers, and worrying about where our different kinds of garbage are supposed to go. Don’t try to sort a wine bottle into the wrong bag! The trash police will punish you. The truth about recycling is that it’s a giant waste of dollars and doesn’t help the environment. But don’t tell your kids. They won’t believe you. They’ve been brainwashed.
E) Only private enterprise can save public health care. Tommy Douglas, the CBC’s Greatest Canadian, brought us universal health care. But even his plan didn’t originally pay for everybody’s minor diseases, such as ingrown toenails. His primary goal was to make sure nobody faced financial ruin if they got sick. Today we have a system where controlling costs is more important than treating patients, and where ideology is disabling us. In some places, including Toronto, people go blind waiting for cataract (白内障) surgery. The government could restore their sight tomorrow simply by sending them to a private clinic instead of to a hospital. The cost to the government would be exactly the same. But in Canada, "private" is a dirty word, and so the government would rather you go blind. Poor Tommy would be spinning in his grave.
F) David Suzuki is bad for the environment. From global warming to farmed salmon and genetically modified crops, David Suzuki has just one message: The end is near. He is our homegrown prophet of doom, who can predict what will happen in the future. He advocates the essential wickedness of the human race. Like a modern Savonarola, he warns that unless we cast our material possessions into the bonfire, we’re all going to hell. The trouble with this predicting vision is that people are starting to isolate from the environment. And our hugely expensive investment in the unworkable Kyoto treaty, which Mr. Suzuki tells us doesn’t go nearly far enough, will wipe out more practical measures to cut smog and clean up our waste sites.
G) A national daycare program won’t do a thing to help poor kids. Cheap national daycare! Who could be against it? It’s supposed to give kids a better start in life, and nobody can object to that. But in Quebec, where the program started, universal daycare has turned out to be nothing more than a giant (and extremely costly) subsidy for relatively well-off middle-class parents. Few poor parents use the system. No doubt convenient daycare is a gift sent by god for many people. But so far there is no definitive evidence that kids who go to daycare go on to do better in school or in life. So if we want to invest billions in helping kids, why are we spending it on the kids who need help the least?
H) Group of Seven artists are overexposed genre (类型) painters. I like A.Y. Jackson as much as you do. His paintings remind me of when I went to summer camp. I grew up with a reproduction of The West Wind hanging in our living room. (That was by Tom Thomson, who wasn’t really a member of Group of Seven, but never mind.) Group of Seven were the first artists to depict the wild Canadian landscape, and they were bold young rebels in their time. But that time was 80 years ago. Today their work is the essence of bourgeois picture-postcard art—the kind of art it’s safe to take your mother to see. Enough, already. Maybe it’s time we moved on.
I) The United States is the greatest force for ever the world has ever known. Of all the shocking things you can say around the dinner table, this is the most shocking one. After all, America-criticizing is part of our national identity. At best, we see our neighbor as a well-intentioned but arrogant and wrong-doing bully (欺负弱小者) that throws its weight around too much. At worst, we see our neighbor as one of the most evil nations in the world. And yet, right now, hundreds of millions of people in desperately poor parts of the world are being liberated from millennia of suffering and serfdom. Why? Because of the United States, which has spread its idea of economic freedom—and its purchasing power—around the world.
David Suzuki believes that "the end is near", and he is regarded as a local prophet of doom.
选项
答案
F
解析
根据题目中的David Suzuki和the end is near定位到F段。该段第2句的one message里的信息同题目中他认为的内容一致,故可判断题目信息来源于F段。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5xa7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Inbringingupchildren,everyparentwatcheseagerlythechild’sacquisitionofeachnewskill—thefirstspokenwords,thefirs
Althoughmanyofusmayfeelair-conditionersbringrelieffromhot,humidorpollutedoutsideair,theyposemanypotentialhea
Thereisapopularbeliefamongparentsthatschoolsarenolongerinterestedinspelling.Thisis,however,a【C1】______.Nosch
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledIsUniversityEducationUseless?followingtheoutline
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledOnPersonalPrivacyinCyberspacefollowingtheoutlin
A、Wildfires.B、Famine.C、Flood.D、Plague.A短文提到,旱灾也可能是气候变化的另一个结果,而在加州,干旱的土地则意味着会引发更多野火。A为答案。
A、4.B、13.C、17.D、18.B细节题。本题考查事实细节。由eyshlisteninga原文可知,此次发生在土耳其的爆炸事件共导致13名工作人员死亡,而不是之前报道的17人。因此B为答案。
A、Thefatheralonemakestheimportantdecision.B、Themotheralonemakestheimportantdecision.C、Childrenoldenoughareallo
A、Inahotel.B、InLondon.C、Inamuseum.D、Inarestaurant.A女士说这个宾馆糟糕透了,她希望他们没有来这儿。由此不难推断,男士和女士在宾馆。故选A。
随机试题
简述广义的行政组织和狭义的行政组织。
Somepeoplearguethatself-plagiarism(自我剽窃)isimpossiblebydefinitionbecauseplagiarismistheftandpeoplecannotstealfr
患儿,男,5天,因呼吸急促入院,胸片检查提示右侧膈疝,上消化道碘水造影未见异常,此时应
患者赵××,女34岁,身热,微恶风,头胀痛,汗出不畅,鼻塞涕黄,咳嗽痰粘,咽喉肿痛,口渴喜饮,舌尖红,苔薄黄,脉浮数者,治法宜
某男,29岁,咽喉肿痛,目生翳障,可选用()。
如果甲公司违约,乙公司提起诉讼,下列不具有管辖权的是()人民法院。乙公司在2006年11月12H要求甲公司支付110万元,乙公司在2006年10月2日应还甲公司20万元服装款,那么()。
不同回路、不同电压和交流与直流的导线,不得穿人同一管子内。()
根据《环境影响评价技术导则—总纲》,下列选项属于污染物排放特点的有()。
会计实务中,支票、银行本票以及银行汇票应通过“应收票据”予以核算。()
会计系统控制主要包括( )。
最新回复
(
0
)