首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Must the Poor Go Hungry Just So the Rich Can Drive? Sports stars like Mo Farah will not change a simple fact: people are sta
Must the Poor Go Hungry Just So the Rich Can Drive? Sports stars like Mo Farah will not change a simple fact: people are sta
admin
2013-09-26
98
问题
Must the Poor Go Hungry Just So the Rich Can Drive?
Sports stars like Mo Farah will not change a simple fact: people are starving because of the west’s thirst for biofuels.
I don’t blame Mo Farah, Pele and Haile Gebrselassie, who lined up, all hugs and smiles, outside Downing Street for a photocall at the prime minister’s hunger summit. Perhaps they were unaware of the way in which they were being used to promote David Cameron’s corporate approach to overseas aid. Perhaps they were also unaware of the crime against humanity over which he presides. Perhaps Cameron himself is unaware of it.
You should by now have heard about the famine developing in the Sahel region of West Africa. Poor harvests and high food prices threaten the lives of some 18 million people. The global price of food is likely to rise still further, as a result of low crop yields in the United States, caused by the worst drought in 50 years. World cereal prices, in response to this disaster, climbed 17% last month.
We have been cautious about attributing such events to climate change; perhaps too cautious. A new paper by James Hansen, head of Nasa’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, shows that there has been a sharp increase in the frequency of extremely hot summers. Between 1951 and 1980 these events affected between 0.1% and 0.2% of the world’s land surface each year. Now, on average, they affect 10% . Hansen explains that " the odds that natural variability created these extremes are extremely small, vanishingly small". Both the droughts in the Sahel and the US crop failures are likely to be the result of climate change.
But this is not the only sense in which the rich world’s use of fuel is causing the poor to starve. In the United Kingdom, in the rest of the European Union and in the United States, governments have chosen to deploy a cure as bad as the disease. Despite overwhelming evidence of the harm their policy is causing, none of them will change course.
Biofuels are the means by which governments in the rich world avoid hard choices. Rather than raise fuel economy standards as far as technology allows, rather than promoting a shift from driving to public transport, walking and cycling, rather than insisting on better town planning to reduce the need to travel, they have chosen to exchange our wild overconsumption of petroleum for the wild overconsumption of fuel made from crops. No one has to drive less or make a better car: everything remains the same except the source of fuel. The result is a competition between the world’s richest, and poorest consumers, a contest between overconsumption and survival.
There was never any doubt about which side would win.
I’ve been banging on about this since 2004, and everything I warned of then has happened. The US and the European Union have both set targets and created generous financial incentives for the use of biofuels. The results have been a disaster for people and the planet.
Already, 40% of US com(maize)production is used to feed cars. The proportion will rise this year as a result of the smaller harvest.
Though the market for biodicsel(生物柴油)is largely confined to the European Union, it has already captured 7% of the world’s output of vegetable oil. The European commission admits that its target(10% of transport fuels by 2020)will raise world cereal prices by between 3% and 6% . Oxfam estimates that with every 1% increase in the price of food, another 16 million people go hungry.
By 2021, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development says that 14% of the world’s maize and other coarse grains ,16% of its vegetable oil and 34% of its sugarcane will be used to make people in the gas-guzzling(大量消耗的)nations feel better about themselves. The demand for biofuel will be met, it reports, partly through an increase in production; partly through a " reduction in human consumption". The poor will starve so that the rich can drive.
The rich world’s demand for biofuels is already causing a global land grab. ActionAid estimates that European companies have now seized 5 m hectares of farmland—an area the size of Denmark—in developing countries for industrial biofuel production. Small farmers, growing food for themselves and local markets, have been thrown off their land and deprived. Tropical forests, savannahs(南美大草原)and grasslands have been cleared to plant what the industry still calls "green fuels".
When the impacts of land clearance and the use of nitrogen fertilisers are taken into account, biofuels produce more greenhouse gases than fossil fuels do. The UK, which claims that half the biofuel sold here meets its sustainability criteria, solves this problem by excluding the greenhouse gas emissions caused by changes in land use. Its sustainability criteria are, as a result, worthless.
Even second-generation biofuels are an environmental disaster, either extending the cultivated area or removing the straw and stovers(干草)which protect the soil from erosion and keep carbon and nutrients in the ground. The combination of first- and second-generation biofuels—encouraging fanners to plough up grasslands and to leave the soil bare—and hot summers could create the perfect conditions for a new dust bowl.
Our government knows all this. One of its own studies shows that if the European Union stopped producing biofuels, the amount of vegetable oils it exported to world markets would rise by 20% and the amount of wheat by 33% , reducing world prices.
Preparing for the prime minister’s hunger summit on Sunday, the international development department argued that, with a rising population, " the food production system will need to be radically improved, not just to produce more food but to produce it sustainably and fairly to ensure that the poorest people have the access to food that they need". But another government department—transport—boasts on its website that, thanks to its policies, drivers in this country have now used 4. 4bn litres(升)of biofuel.
Of this 30% was produced from recycled cooking oil. The rest consists of 3bn litres of refined energy snatched from the mouths of the people that Cameron claims to be helping.
Some of those to whom the government is now extending its "nutrition interventions" may have been starved by its own policies. In this and other ways, David Cameron, with the support of various sporting heroes, is offering charity, not justice. And that is no basis for liberating the poor.
Second-generation biofuels are______, because they remove the straw and stovers that protect the soil.
选项
答案
an environmental disaster
解析
本题考查第二代生物燃料是什么,因为其除去了保护土壤的稻草和干草。根据定位句可知,即使是由作物废料和木材制造的第二代生物燃料也是环境的灾难,因为第二代生物燃料扩大了耕种面积,除去了避免土壤流失的稻草和干草。此处要求填人名词性短语作表语,故an environmental disaster为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/6227777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Mostpeoplewouldbe【C1】______bythehighqualityofmedicine【C2】______tomostAmericans.Thereisalotofspecialization,a
Nowadays,incominggenerationsreallyrelynowonthepowerofthe"Internet"whenitcomestosearchingforinformation.Justt
Nowadays,incominggenerationsreallyrelynowonthepowerofthe"Internet"whenitcomestosearchingforinformation.Justt
Nowadays,incominggenerationsreallyrelynowonthepowerofthe"Internet"whenitcomestosearchingforinformation.Justt
NowwetraveltothenorthcentralpartoftheUnitedStates.WeareinthestateofSouthDakota.Thelandisbigandmostlyfi
CrowdsourcingaBetterWorldThecrowdsourcingconcept—collectingcontributionsfrommanyindividualstoachieveagoal—was
A、SouthAfrica.B、EasternRussia.C、India.D、Congo.C短文说,最早的已知钻石于几个世纪前在印度被发现。所以C正确。选项都是国家或地区的名称,猜测题目可能问地点。边听边做笔记,把听到的国家或地区所出现的情况
A、TheyweremadeonlythreetimesinEarth’shistory.B、ThemostbeautifuldiamondcomesfromAfrica.C、Theyareevenhardertha
随机试题
容易引起水敏现象的粘土矿物是()。
Fondofsingingassheis,sheis______agoodsingerbyprofession.
A.遗传病诊断B.产前诊断C.终止妊娠手术D.胎儿性别鉴定E.医学技术鉴定《中华人民共和国母婴保健法》所指的孕产期保健服务不包括
A.脾气虚证B.脾阳虚证C.脾不统血证D.脾气下陷证E.寒湿困脾证
产品差异有时容易被竞争对手模仿或消除。但是,如果差异是建立在()的基础上,则可能产生持久的吸引力和竞争优势。
例三:假设资本资产定价模型成立,相关证券的风险与收益信息如表2-5所示。(注:表中的数字是相互关联的)根据案例三,回答下列题目:根据表中其他信息可以得出⑧的值,即Y股票与市场组合的相关系数为( )。
注册会计师对销售与收款业务循环的内部控制进行了解并对其内部控制进行测试,请对下列陈述进行分析判断。适当的职责分离有助于防止各种有意的或无意的错误,以下的表述中未进行适当职责分离的有()。
下列说法中错误的是()。
(2016年真题)2014年9月,某基金公司总经理李某涉嫌内幕交易罪,Y省S市人民检察院依照《刑事诉讼法》第172条提起公诉,S市中级人民法院依照《刑事诉讼法》第23条的规定对该案进行了审理。法院认为:李某犯内幕交易罪,涉案金额11.2亿元,非法所得18
曲线y=的斜渐近线为_____________.
最新回复
(
0
)